Long-term multi-risk assessment: Statistical treatment of interaction among risks

Natural Hazards

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 701-722

  Selva, Jacopo ^a  

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI GEOFISICA E VULCANOLOGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Multi hazard; Multi risk

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EARTHQUAKE; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; METHODOLOGY; NATURAL HAZARD; NUMERICAL MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TSUNAMI; VULNERABILITY;

EID: 84877016021     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-013-0599-9     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alberico I, Petrosino P, Lirer L (2011) Volcanic hazard and risk assessment in a multi-source volcanic area: the example of Napoli city. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11, 1057-1970. doi: 10. 5194/nhess-11-1057-2011.
2. Bazzurro P, Cornell C (1999) Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89(2): 501-520.
3. Bommer J, Spence R, Erdik M, Tabuchi S, Aydinoglu N, Booth E, del Re D, Peterken O (2002) Development of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance. J Seismol 6: 431-446. doi: 10. 1023/A: 1020095711419.
4. Bovolo A, Abele S, Bathurst J, Caballero D, Ciglan M, Eftichidi G, Simo B (2009) A distributed framework for multi-risk assessment of natural hazards used to model the effects of forest fire on hydrology and sediment yield. Comput Geosci 35: 924-945. doi: 10. 1016/j. cageo. 2007. 10. 010.
5. ByMuR Project (2010-2013) Quantificazione del Multi-Rischio con approccio Bayesiano: un caso studio per i rischi naturali della città di Napoli (Bayesian multi-risk assessment: a case study for natural risks in the city of Naples). http://bymur. bo. ingv. it.
6. Cavalieri F, Franchin P, Gehl P, Khazai B (2012) Quantitative assessment of social losses based on physical damage and interaction with infrastructural systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. doi: 10. 1002/eqe. 2220.
7. Convertito V, Zollo A (2011) Assessment of pre-crisis and syn-crisis seismic hazard at Campi Flegrei and Mt. Vesuvius volcanoes, Campania, southern Italy. Bull Volcanol73: 767-783. doi: 10. 1007/s00445-011-0455-2.
8. Cornell C (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58: 1583-1606.
9. Cornell C, Krawinkle H. (2000) Progress and challanges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News 3(2). http://peer. berkeley. edu/news/2000spring/index. html.
10. De Natale G, Zollo A (1986) Statistical analysis and clustering features of the Phlegraean Fields earthquake sequence (May 1983-May 1984). Bull Seismol Soc Am 76(3): 801-814.
11. Der Kiureghian A (2005) Non-ergodicity and PEER's framework formula. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34: 1643-1652. doi: 10. 1002/eqe. 504.
12. Douglas J (2007) Physical vulnerability modelling in natural hazard risk assessment. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7: 283-288.
13. Elefante L, Jalayer F, Iervolino I, Manfredi G (2010) Disaggregation-based response weighting scheme for seismic risk assessment of structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30: 1513-1527.
14. FEMA (1997) Multi hazard identification and risk assessment: a cornerstone of the national mitigation strategy. Tech. rep., FEMA.
15. Gonzalez F, Geist E, Jaffe B, Kanoglu U, Mofjeld H, Synolakis C, Titov V, Arcas D, Bellomo D, Carlton D, Horning T, Johnson J, Newman J, Parsons T, Peters R, Peterson C, Priest G, Venturato A, Weber J, Wong F, Yalciner A (2009) Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment at Seaside, Oregon, for near- and far-field seismic sources. J Geophys Res 114, C11023. doi: 10. 1029/2008JC005132.
16. Grunthal G, Thieken A, Schwarz J, Radtke K, Smolka A, Merz B (2006) Comparative risk assessments for the City of Cologne-storms, floods, Earthquakes. Nat Hazards 38(1-2): 21-44. doi: 10. 1007/s11069-005-8598-0.
17. Gruppo di Lavoro (2004) Redazione della mappa di pericolosita' sismica prevista dall'Ordinanza PCM 3274 del 20 marzo 2003. Rapporto Conclusivo per il Dipartimento della Protezione Civile. Tech. rep., Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Milano-Roma.
18. Guidoboni E, Ciucciarelli C (2011) The Campi Flegrei caldera: historical revision and new data on seismic crises, bradyseisms, the Monte Nuovo eruption and ensuing earthquakes (twelfth century 1582 AD). Bull Volcanol73: 655-677. doi: 10. 1007/s00445-010-0430-3.
19. Guidoboni E, Mariotti D (2008) Il terremoto e il maremoto del 1908: effetti e parametri sismici. In: G. Bertolaso, E. Boschi, E. Guidoboni, G. Valensise (eds) Il terremoto e il maremoto del 28 dicembre 1908: analisi sismologica, impatto, prospettive, p 814. SGA edizioni.
20. INGV-DPC: Interactive Seismic Hazard Maps (2004) http://esse1-gis. mi. ingv. it.
21. Lee K, Rosowsky D (2006) Fragility analysis of woodframe buildings considering combined snow and earthquake loading. Struct Saf 28(3): 289-303.
22. Marzocchi W, Sandri L, Gasparini P, Newhall C, Boschi E (2004) Quantifying probabilities of volcanic events: the example of volcanic hazard at Mt. Vesuvius. J Geophys Res 109(B11201). doi: 10. 1029/2004JB003155.
23. Marzocchi W, Sandri L, Selva J (2008) BET_EF: a probabilistic tool for long- and short-term eruption forecasting. Bull Volcanol70: 623-632.
24. Marzocchi W, Mastellone ML, Di Ruocco A, Novelli P, Romeo E, Gasparini P (2009) Principles of multi-risk assessment: interaction amongst natural and man-induced risks (Project report). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
25. Marzocchi W, Garcia-Aristizabal A, Gasparini P, Mastellone M, Di Ruocco A (2012) Basic principles of multi-risk assessment: a case study in Italy. Nat Hazards, pp 1-23. 10. 1007/s11069-012-0092-x.
26. Masi A (2003) Seismic vulnerability assessment of gravity load designed R/C frames. Bull Earthq Eng 1: 371-395.
27. Mignan A (2012) MATRIX-CITY user manual (D7. 2 project report), new methodologies for multi-hazard and multi-risk assessment methods for Europe, FP7 project, 77 pp.
28. NIBS (2000) HAZUS99 estimated annualized earthquake losses for the United States. Tech. Rep. 366, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D. C.
29. NIBS (2004) HAZUS, Technical manuals, vol. Earthquake loss estimation methodology, federal emergency management agency edn. Washington, D. C.
30. Orsi G, Civetta L, Del Gaudio C, de Vita S, di Vito MA, Isaia R, Petrazzuoli S, Ricciardi G, Ricco C (1999) Short-term ground deformations and seismicity in the nested Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy): an example of active block-resurgence in a densely populated area. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 91(2-4): 415-451.
31. Orsi G, Di Vito MA, Selva J, Marzocchi W (2009) Long-term forecast of eruption style and size at Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy). Earth Planet Sci Lett 287: 265-276.
32. Pinto PE (ed.) (2007) Probabilistic methods for seismic assessment of existing structures, vol. LESSLOSS Report No. 2007/06. IUSS Press, Pavia.
33. Reese S, Cousins W, Power W, Palmer N, Tejakusuma I, Nugrahadi S (2007) Tsunami vulnerability of buildings and people in South Java-field observations after the July 2006 Java tsunami. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 7(5): 573-589.
34. Ryden J, Rychlik I (2006) Probability and risk analysis, an introduction for engineers, springer edn. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Berlin.
35. Sandri L, Guidoboni E, Marzocchi W, Selva J (2009) Bayesian event tree for eruption forecasting (BET_EF) at Vesuvius, Italy: a retrospective forward application to the 1631 eruption. Bull Volcanol71(7): 729-745.
36. Selva J, Costa A, Marzocchi W, Sandri L (2010) BET_VH: exploring the influence of natural uncertainties on long-term hazard from tephra fallout at Campi Flegrei (Italy). Bull Volcanol72(6): 717-733. doi: 10. 1007/s00445-010-0358-7.
37. Selva J, Orsi G, Di Vito M, Marzocchi W, Sandri L (2012) Probability hazard map for future vent opening at the Campi Flegrei caldera, Italy. Bull Volcanol74, pp 497-510. doi: 10. 1007/s00445-011-0528-2.
38. Spahn H, Hoppe M, Vidiarina H, Usdianto B (2010) Experience from three years of local capacity development for tsunami early warning in Indonesia: challenges, lessons and the way ahead. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10: 1411-1429. doi: 10. 5194/nhess-10-1411-2010.
39. Stergiou E, Kiremidjian A (2006) Treatment of uncertainties in seismic risk analysis of transportation systems. Tech. Rep. 154, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Civil Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
40. Strasser F, Bommer J, Sesetyan K, Erdik M, Cagnan Z, Irizarry J, Goula X, Lucatoni A, Sabetta F, Bal I, Crowley H, Lindholm C (2008) A comparative study of European earthquake loss estimation tools for a scenario in Istanbul. J Earthq Eng 12(S2): 246-256. doi: 10. 1080/13632460802014188.
41. Stucchi M, Meletti C, Montaldo V, Crowley H, Calvi GM, Boschi E (2011) Seismic Hazard Assessment (2003-2009) for the Italian Building Code. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101: 1885-1911.
42. Zuccaro G, Cacace F, Spence R, Baxter P (2008) Impact of explosive eruption scenarios at Vesuvius. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 178: 416-453.