Quantitative risk analysis of oil storage facilities in seismic areas

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 123, Issue 1-3, 2005, Pages 61-69

  Fabbrocino, Giovanni ^a   Iervolino, Iunio ^a   Orlando, Francesca ^a   Salzano, Ernesto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Earthquake; Industrial risk; Multi hazard; Quantitative risk analysis; Seismic risk

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERICS; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STEEL TANKS;

ATMOSPHERIC STEEL TANKS; CONTOUR PLOTS; OIL STORAGE FACILITIES; QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS (QRA);

SEISMOLOGY;

OIL;

OIL STORAGE TANK; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

OIL SUPPLY; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; EVALUATION; HAZARD; ITALY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EVALUATION STUDIES; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; NATURAL DISASTERS; PETROLEUM; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 21444435492     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.04.015     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, Off. J. Eur. Comm., L 10/13, Brussels.
2. I. Iervolino, G. Fabbrocino, and G. Manfredi Fragility of standard industrial structures by a response surface based method J. Earth. Eng. 8 6 2004 1 19
3. European Commission DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen (DG JRC), United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR), On the collaboration agreement between the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction of the United Nations and the Directorate General Joint Research Center of the European Commission, Activities Report 20ISDR, 2003. http://www.unisdr.org.
4. C.A. Cornell, F. Jalayer, R.O. Hamburger, and D.A. Foutch The probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC/FEMA steel moment frame guidelines J. Struct. Eng. 128 4 2002 526 533
5. C.A. Cornell Engineering seismic risk analysis B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 58 1968 1583 1606
6. R.K. McGuire Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 85 5 1995 1275 1284
7. C.A. Cornell, Hazard, Ground Motions and Probabilistic Assessments for PBSD, PEER Report series 2004/2005, September 2005. Berkeley, CA. http://peer.berkeley.edu.
8. I. Iervolino, and C.A. Cornell Record selection for non-linear seismic analysis of structures, earthquake spectra EERI 21 2005 3
9. I. Iervolino, Quantitative Seismic Risk Analysis in Process Industry, Department of Structural Analysis and Design, University of Naples Federico II, Ph.D. thesis in Seismic Risk, 2003.
10. V. Convertito, Extension of classical attenuation laws: influence and implications on the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, Dipartimento di Analisi e Progettazione Strutturale, Università di Napoli "Federico II", Ph.D. thesis, 2003.
11. F. Sabetta, and A. Pugliese Attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from Italian strong-motion records B. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77 1987 1491 1513
12. ISO/TC 59/SC 14, Design life, Buildings and Constructed Assets Service Life Planning. Part 1. General Principles. ISO 15686-1, 2000.
13. F.P. Lees Loss Prevention in the Process Industries second ed. 1996 Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford
14. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis 2000 American Institute of Chemical Engineers New York
15. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) Guidelines for evaluating the characteristics of VCEs, Flash Fires and BLEVE's 1994 American Institute of Chemical Engineers New York
16. E. Salzano, I. Iervolino, and G. Fabbrocino Seismic risk of atmospheric storage tanks in the framework of quantitative risk analysis J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 16 2003 403 409
17. HAZUS, Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, National Institute of Building Science, Risk Management Solutions, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 1997.
18. J.M. Eidinger Earthquakeic fragility formulation for water systems ASCE-TCLEE 2001
19. M.J. O'Rourke, P. So, Seismic Fragility Curves for On-Grade Steel Tanks, Earthquake Spectra, 16, NY, USA, 2000.
20. D.J. Finney Probit Analysis 1971 Cambridge University Press
21. J.A. Vilchez, H. Montiel, J. Casal, and J. Arnaldos Analytical expression for the calculation of damage percentage using the probit methodology J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 14 2001 193 197
22. T. Rossetto, and A. Elnashai Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data Eng. Struct. 25 1 2003 1241 1263
23. Drafting of the seismic hazard map given by OPCM 3274 March 20, 2003. Final Report for the Civil Protection Department, INGV, 2004. In Italian.
24. ER&E Design Practices, Safety in plant design, EXXON Engineering, 1982.
25. AES-B-55, Plant layout, ARAMCO Engineering Standards, 1983.
26. IRInformation IM.2.5.2, Plant layout and spacing for oil and chemical plants, IRI, 1991.
27. API RP 2001. Fire protection in refineries, API, Washington, 1984.
28. IP, Fire precautions at petroleum refineries and bulk storage installations, John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
29. API Standards 620, 650, and 653 Interpretations, API 850 - American Petroleum Institute, Washington D.C., USA, 1997.
30. AWWA D100-96 - Welded Steel Tanks for Water Storage, American Water Works Association, Denver, CO, USA, 1996.
31. G.E. Apostolakis Risk-informed decision making European Safety and Reliability Conference, plenary lecture Maastricht (NL) 2003
32. R. Wilson, and E.A.C. Crouch Risk assessment and comparisons: an introduction Science 237 1987 267 290
33. D.A. Carter, and I.L. Hirst Worst case methodology for the initial assessment of societal risk from proposed major accident installations J. Hazard. Mater. 71 2000 117 128
34. J.D. Balle, and P. Floyd Societal Risk 1998 HSE Books UK
35. Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Canvey: an investigation of potential hazards from operations in the Canvey Island/Thurrock Area, London, UK, 1978.
36. C.J.H. Van Den Bosh, and R.A.P.M. Weterings Methods for the calculation of physical effects (Yellow Book) 1997 Committee for the Prevention of Disasters The Hague (NL)
37. P.A.M. Uijt de Haag, and B.J.M. Ale Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment (Purple Book) 1999 Committee for the Prevention of Disasters The Hague (NL)
38. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, http://www.epa.org.
39. PHAST code, DNV - Det Norske Veritas Limited, UK, 2004. http://www.dnv.com.
40. A.W. Cox, F.P. Lees, and M.L. Ang Classification of Hazardous Locations 1990 Institution of Chemical Engineering Rugby
41. A.C. Van den Berg The multi-energy method. A framework for vapour cloud explosion blast prediction J. Hazard. Mater. 12 1985 1 10
42. J.B.M.M. Eggen GAME: Development of Guidance for the Application of the Multi-Energy method 1995 TNO-PML
43. P.H. Thomas The size of flames from natural fires 9th Proc. Comb. Inst., The Combustion Institute Pittsburgh, PA 1963 844 859
44. D. Burgess, and M. Hertzberg Radiation from pool flames N.H. Afgan J.M. Beer Heat Transfer in Flames 1974 Chapter 27
45. K.S. Mudan, and P.A. Croce Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering 1988 Society of Fire Protection Engineers
46. J. Cook, Z. Bahrami, and R.J. Whitehouse A comprehensive program for calculation of flame radiation levels J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 3 1990 150 155
47. D.A. Crowl, and J.F. Louvar Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications 1990 Prentice Hall NJ, USA
48. Rijnmond Public Authority Risk analysis of six potentially hazardous industrial objects in the Rijnmond area, A Pilot Study 1982 Redel Dordrecht
49. J.K. Vrijling, W. van Hengel, and R.J. Houben Acceptable risk as a basis for design Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 59 1998 141 150
50. Health & Safety Executive A Guide to the Control of Major Accident Hazard Regulations L111 1999 HSE Books