Multi-hazard and multi-risk decision-support tools as a part of participatory risk governance: Feedback from civil protection stakeholders

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Volumn 8, Issue , 2014, Pages 50-67

  Komendantova, Nadejda ^a,c   Mrzyglocki, Roger ^b   Mignan, Arnaud ^c   Khazai, Bijan ^d   Wenzel, Friedemann ^d   Patt, Anthony ^a,c   Fleming, Kevin ^e  

^a INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

^b German Committee for Disaster Reduction ^*  (Germany)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^e GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Multi hazard; Multi risk; Risk governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894461450     PISSN: 22124209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Antunes P., Santos R., Videira N. Participatory decision-making for sustainable development - the use of mediated modeling techniques. Land Use Policy 2006, 23(2006):44-52.
2. Arnold M., Chen U., Deichmann R.S., Dilley M., Lerner-Lam A., Pullen R., et al. Natural disaster hotspots: case studies 2006, The World Bank.
3. Assmuth T., Hild-en M., Benighaus C. Integrated risk assessment and risk governance as socio-political phenomena: a synthetic view of the challenges. Sci Total Environ 2010, 408:3943-3953.
4. BBK. Methode für die Risikoanalyse im Bevölkerungsschutz. Tech. 1024 rep. Bundesamt für Bevölkerungsschutz und Katastrophenhilfe. URL http://www.bbk.bund.de/cln_027/nn_402322/SharedDocs/Publikationen/Broschueren__Flyer/Methode__Risikoanalyse-BS,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf/Methode_Risikoanalyse-BS.pdf.
5. Bilham R. The seismic future of cities. Bull Earthquake Eng 2009, 7:839-887. 10.1007/s10518-009-9147-0.
6. Carpignano A., Golia E., Di Mauro C., Bouchon S., Nordvik J.-P. A methodological approach for the definition of multi-risk maps at regional level: first application. J Risk Res 2009, 12:513-534.
7. COM, (2009) 82 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions, Brussels.
8. COM(2010b) 673 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. The EU Internal Security Strategy in Action: five steps towards a more secure Europe, Brussels.
9. COM (2010a) 1626 final. A Community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters Commission Staff Working Paper. 2010. Risk Assessment and Mapping Guideline for Disaster Management, Brussels.
10. Costanza R., Ruth M. Using dynamic modeling to scope environment problems and build consensus. Environ. Manage. 1998, 22(2):183-195.
11. Costanza R., Greer J. The Chesapeake Bay and its watershed: A model for sustainable ecosystem management?. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions 1995, 169-213. Columbia University Press, New York, (593 p.). L.H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling, S. Light (Eds.).
12. Cox T. Risk integration and decision-making, in: Risk assessment and management in the context of the Seveso II Directive. Industrial Safety Series 1998, vol. 6. Elsevier.
13. Daniell J.E., Khazai B., Wenzel F. The CATDAT Damaging Earthquakes Database. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2011, 11:2235-2251. 10.5194/nhess-11-2235-2011.
14. Di Mauro D., Lepidi S., Meloni A., Palangio P. Update on monitoring of magnetic and electromagnetic tectonic signals in Central Italy. Ann Geophys 2006, 50(1). (in press).
15. Forester J. The deliberative practitioner. Encouraging participatory planning process. Cambridge, MA 1999, MIT Press.
16. Funtowicz S., Ravetz J. The worth of a songbird: ecological economics, as a post-normal science. Ecol Econ 1994, 10:197-207.
17. FEMA (2009) Hazus MH MR4 Technical manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC. Available at online at: http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/hz_manuals.shtm.
18. Hoyois D., Guha-Sapir D. Three decades of floods in Europe: a preliminary analysis of EMDAT data. Working paper (draft) 2003, CRED, Brussels, CRED, Brussels.
19. Granger K, Jones T, Laiba M, Scott G. Community risk in Cairns: a multi-hazards risk assessment. Technical report, Australian Geological Survey Organisation (AGSO). URL Access; 1999. http://www.ga.gov.au/hazards/reports/cairns.
20. Grossi P, Kunreuther H, Windeler D An introduction to catastrophe models and insurance. Catastrophe modeling: a new approach to managing risk 2005, 23-42. Springer Science + Business Media, Inc, Boston. P. Grossi, H. Kunreuther (Eds.).
21. Grünthal G., Thieken A., Schwarz J., Radtke K., Smolka A., Merz B. Comparative risk assessment for the city of Cologne - storms, foods, earthquakes. Nat Hazards 2006, 38(1-2):22-44.
22. Jasanoff S. The fifth branch: science advisers as policy makers 1990, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
23. IRGC Risk governance deficits: analysis, illustration and recommendations. Policy brief 2010, International Risk Governance Council, Geneva, Switzerland.
24. ISO/IEC Guide 73:2009. Risk management - vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization; 2009.
25. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect Theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47(2):263-291.
26. Kappes M.S., Keiler M., von Elverfeldt K., Glade T. Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review. Nat. Hazards 2012, 64:1925-1958. 10.1007/s11069-012-0294-2.
27. Korfmacher K.S. Water quality modeling for environmental management: Lessons from the policy sciences. Policy Sci 1998, 31:35-54.
28. Krausmann E., et al. Industrial accidents triggered by earthquakes, floods and lightning: lessons learned from a database analysis. Nat Hazards 2011, 59(1):285-300.
29. Korfmacher K. Water quality modeling for environmental management: lessons from the policy sciences. Policy Sci 1998, 31:35-54.
30. Marzocchi W., Newhall Ch., Woo G. The scientific management of volcanic crises. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 2012, 247-248(2012):181-189.
31. Mignan A. D7.2 MATRIX-CITY User Manual, New methodologies for multi-hazard and multi-risk assessment methods for Europe. Deliverable 2013, 7(2):78. http://matrix.gpi.kit.edu/downloads/MATRIX-D7.2.pdf.
32. Mignan A, Wiemer S., Giardini D. The quantification of low probability-high consequences events: Part I. A generic multi-risk approach. Nat Hazards 2014.
33. Morecroft J.D.W. Executive knowledge, models, and learning. Modeling for learning organizations 1994, 3-28. Productivity Press, Portland, Oregon. J.D.W. Morecroft, J.D. Sterman (Eds.).
34. Munich Re. Topics 2000: natural catastrophes - the current position. Technical report URL; 2000. http://www.imia.com/downloads/external_papers/EP17_2003.pdf.
35. Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Hoffmann A, Giovannini E. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide, OECD Statistics working paper series; 2005.
36. Phillips L.D. Decision analysis for group discussion support. Tackling strategic problems: The role of group discussion support 1990, Sage Publishers, London. C. Eden, J. Radford (Eds.).
37. Reese S., Bell R., King A. RiskScape: a new tool for comparing risk from natural hazards. Water Atmos 2007, 15:24-25.
38. Senge P.M., Sterman J.D. Systems thinking and organizational learning: acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future 1994, 195-216. (Hrsg.): Modeling for Learning Organizations, Portland, OR. J.D.W. Morecroft, J.D. Sterman (Eds.).
39. Selva J Long-term multi-risk assessment: statistical treatment of interaction among risks. Nat Hazards 2013, 67(2):701-722. 10.1007/s11069-013-0599-9.
40. Schmidt J., Matcham I., Reese S., King A., Bell R., Henderson R., et al. Quantitative multi-risk analysis for natural hazards: a framework for multi-risk modelling. Nat. Hazards 2011, 58. 10.1007/s11069-011-9721-z.
41. T6 Assessing and mapping multiple risks for spatial planning 2007, Armonia Project deliverable. EU FP6, Rome, (T6).
42. Tesh S. Hidden arguments: political ideology and disease prevention policy 1990, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
43. UN-ISDR. Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. Technical report, United Nations - International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. URL; 2009a. http://www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/report/index.php?id=9413.
44. UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction). Hyogo framework for action 2005-2015: building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. 2005. http://www.unisdr.org/wcdr.
45. Varnes D.J. Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice 1984, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, Paris, France.
46. UN-ISDR. UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. Technical report, United Nations - International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. URL 2009b. http://www.undp.org.ge/new/files/24_619_762164_UNISDR-terminology-2009-eng.pdf.
47. Weston R.F., Ruth M. A dynamic, hierarchical approach to understanding and managing natural economic systems. Ecol. Econ. 1997, 21:1-17.
48. White G., Kates R., Burton I. Knowing better and losing even more: the use of knowledge in hazards management. Environ Hazards 2001, 3:81-92.
49. WMO Comprehensive risk assessment for natural hazards. Technical document 955, World Meteorological Organisation 1999, (URL). http://www.planat.ch/ressources/planat_product_en_198.pdf.
50. The World Bank, 2010, World development report 2010: development and climate change. Washington, DC, USA; 2010.