A method to measure taste qualities, taste intensity, and temporal profile of compounds aimed at human consumption by taste nerve recordings in monkeys

ACS Symposium Series

Volumn 979, Issue , 2008, Pages 185-201

  Hellekant, Göran ^a   Wang, Yiwen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BITTER COMPOUNDS; HUMAN CONSUMPTION; NERVE FIBERS; SWEET PROTEIN; TASTE PANELS; TASTE QUALITY; TEMPORAL PROFILE;

FIBERS;

EID: 84905587647     PISSN: 00976156     EISSN: 19475918     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1021/bk-2008-0979.ch013     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (58)

1. Kare, M. R., Comparative aspects of the sense of taste. In Physiological and Behavioral Aspects of Taste, Kare, M. R.; Halpern, B. P., Eds. University of Ghicago Press: Chicago, 1961; pp 6-15.
2. Kitchell, R. L., Comparative anatomical and physiological studies of gustatory mechanisms. Pergamon Press: London., 1963; p 235-255.
3. Pfaffmann, C., Gustatory Afferent Impulses. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 1941, 17, 243-258.
4. Erickson, R. P.; Doetsch, G. S.; Marshall, D. A., The Gustatory Neural Response Function. Journal of General Physiology 1965, 49, (2), 247-263.
5. Diamant, H.; Hellekant, G.; Zotterman, Y., The effect of miraculin on the taste buds of man, monkey and rat. In Olfaction and Taste IV, Schneider, D., Ed. Wissenschaftlige Verlagsgesellschaft MB4 Stuttgart: Stuttgart, 1972; pp 241-244.
6. Brouwer, J. N.; Hellekant, G.; Kasahara, Y.; van der Wei, H.; Zotterman, Y., Electrophysiological study of the gustatory effects of the sweet proteins monellin and thaumatin in monkey, guinea pig and rat. Acta Physol. Scand. 1973, 89, 550-557.
7. Hellekant, G.; Hagstrom, E. C.; Kasahara, Y.; Zotterman, Y., On the gustatory effects of miraculin and gymnemic acid in monkey. Chem Sens Flavor 1974, 1, 137-145.
8. Hellekant, G., Different types of sweet receptors in mammals. In Olfaction and Taste V, Denton, D.; Cagan, R., Eds. Academic press: New York, San Francisco, London, 1975; Vol. 5, pp 15-21.
9. Glaser, D.; Hellekant, G.; Brouwer, J. N.; van der Wei, H., The Taste Responses in Primates to the Proteins Thaumatin and Monellin and their Phylogenetic Implications. Folia Primatologica 1978, 29, 56-63.
10. Hellekant, G.; Roberts, T. W., Whole nerve and single fiber recordings in non-human primates. In Experimental Cell Biology of Taste and Olfaction: Current Techniques and Protocols, Spielman, A. I.; Brand, J. G., Eds. CRC Press: Boca Raton, New York, London, Tokyo, 1995; pp 277-290.
11. Hellekant, G.; Glaser, D.; Brouwer, J.; van der Wei, H., Gustatory responses in three prosimian and two simian primate species (Tupaia glis, Nycticebus coucang, Galago senegalensis, Callithrix jacchus jacchus and Saginus midas niger) to six sweeteners and miraculin and their phylogenetic implications. Chem. Senses 1981, 6, (3), 165-173.
12. Hellekant, G.; Danilova, V.; Ninomiya, Y., Primate sense of taste: behavioral and single chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerve fiber recordings in the rhesus monkey, Macaca mulatta. J. Neurophysiol. 1997, 77, (2), 978- 993.
13. Hellekant, G.; Ninomiya, Y.; DuBois, G. E.; Danilova, V.; Roberts, T. W., Taste in chimpanzee: I. The summated response to sweeteners and the effect of gymnemic acid. Physiology & Behavior 1996, 60, (2), 469-479.
14. Danilova, V.; Hellekant, G., The taste of ethanol in a primate model. II. Glossopharyngeal nerve response in Macaca mulatta. Alcohol 2000, 21, (3), 259-269.
15. Danilova, V.; Danilov, Y.; Roberts, T.; Tinti, J.-M.; Nofre, C.; Hellekant, G., The sense of taste in a New World monkey, the common marmoset: recordings from the chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves. J Neurophysiol 2002, 88, 579-594.
16. Jin, Z.; Danilova, V.; Assadi-Porter, F. M.; Markley, J. L.; Hellekant, G., Monkey electrophysiological and human psychophysical responses to mutants of the sweet protein brazzein: delineating brazzein sweetness. Chem Senses 2003, 28, (6), 491-498.
17. Schiffman, S. S., Taste quality and neural coding: implications from psychophysics and neurophysiology. Physiol Behav 2000, 69, (1-2), 147- 159.
18. Smith, D. V.; John, S. J.; Boughter, J. D., Neuronal cell types and taste quality coding. Physiol Behav 2000, 69, (1-2), 77-85.
19. Contreras, R. J.; Lundy, R. F., Gustatory neuron types in the periphery: A functional perspective. Physiol Behav 2000, 69, (1-2), 41-52.
20. Adler, E.; Hoon, M. A.; Mueller, K. L.; Chandrashekar, J.; Ryba, N. J.; Zuker, C. S., A novel family of mammalian taste receptors. Cell 2000, 100, (6), 693-702.
21. Chandrashekar, J.; Mueller, K. L.; Hoon, M. A.; Adler, E.; Feng, L.; Guo, W.; Zuker, C. S.; Ryba, N. J., T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors. Cell 2000, 100, (6), 703-711.
22. Max, M.; Shanker, Y. G.; Huang, L.; Rong, M.; Liu, Z.; Campagne, F.; Weinstein, H.; Damak, S.; Margolskee, R. F., Tas1r3, encoding a new candidate taste receptor, is allelic to the sweet responsiveness locus Sac. Nat Genet 2001, 28, (1), 58-63.
23. Nelson, G.; Hoon, M. A.; Chandrashekar, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ryba, N. J.; Zuker, C. S., Mammalian sweet taste receptors. Cell 2001, 106, (3), 381-390.
24. Zhang, Y.; Hoon, M. A.; Chandrashekar, J.; Mueller, K. L.; Cook, B.; Wu, D.; Zuker, C. S.; Ryba, N. J., Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. Cell 2003, 112, (3), 293-301.
25. Zhao, G. Q.; Zhang, Y.; Hoon, M. A.; Chandrashekar, J.; Erlenbach, I.; Ryba, N. J.; Zuker, C. S., The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste. Cell 2003, 115, (3), 255-266.
26. Mueller, K. L.; Hoon, M. A.; Erlenbach, I.; Chandrashekar, J.; Zuker, C. S.; Ryba, N. J., The receptors and coding logic for bitter taste. Nature 2005, 434, (7030), 225-229.
27. Chandrashekar, J.; Hoon, M.; Ryba, N.; Zuker, C., The receptors and cells for mammalian taste Nature 2006, 444, 16 November 288-294.
28. Danilova, V.; Danilov, Y.; Roberts, T.; Elmer, D.; Hellekant, G., Electrophysiological recordings of mammalian taste nerves. In Methods and Frontiers in Neuroscience, Simon, S. A.; Nicolelis, M. A. L., Eds. CRC Press: Boka Raton, London, New York, Washington D.C., 2002; pp 239- 264.
29. Ming, D. Brazzein, a new sweet protein from pentadiplandra brazzeana. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin at Madison, 1994.
30. Jin, Z.; Danilova, V.; Assadi-Porter, F.; Zhao, Q.; Aceti, D.; Markley, J.; Hellekant, G. In Monkey electrophysiological responses to brazzein mutants-where are the critical regions for brazzein's sweet taste, 2nd International Symposium on Sweetener, Hiroshima, Japan, 2002; Hiroshima, Japan, 2002; pp 143, P-28.
31. Green, B. G.; Dalton, P.; Cowart, B.; Shaffer, G.; Rankin, K.; Higgins, J., Evaluating the 'Labeled Magnitude Scale' for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chem Senses 1996, 21, (3), 323-334.
32. Green, B. G.; Shaffer, G. S.; Gilmore, M. M., Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties. Chem. Senses 1993, 18, (6), 683-702.
33. Brouwer, J. N.; Glaser, D.; Hard Af Segerstad, C.; Hellekant, G.; Ninomiya, Y.; Van der Wei, H., The sweetness-inducing effect of miraculin; behavioural and neurophysiological experiments in the rhesus monkey Macaca mulatta. Journal of Physiology 1983, 337, 221-240.
34. Yang, R.; Tabata, S.; Crowley, H. H.; Margolskee, R. F.; Kinnamon, J. C., Ultrastructural localization of gustducin immunoreactivity in microvilli of type II taste cells in the rat. J Comp Neurol 2000, 425, (1), 139-151.
35. Pfaffmann, C., Species differences in taste sensitivity. Science 1953, 117, 470.
36. Beidler, L. M.; Fishman, J. Y.; Hardiman, C. W., Species differences in taste responses. American Journal of Physiology 1955, 181, 945-949.
37. Carpenter, J. A., Species differences in taste preferences. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol 1956, 49, 139-144.
38. Zotterman, Y., Species differences in the water taste. Acta physiol. scand. 1956, 37, 60-70.
39. Glaser, D., Specialization and phyletic trends of sweetness reception in animals. Pure Appl Chem 2002, 74, (2), 1153-1158.
40. Hellekant, G.; Segerstad, C. H.; Roberts, T.; van der Wei, H.; Brouwer, J. N.; Glaser, D.; Haynes, R.; Eichberg, J. W., Effects of gymnemic acid on the chorda tympani proper nerve responses to sweet, sour, salty and bitter taste stimuli in the chimpanzee. Acta Physiology Scand 1985, 124, (3), 399-408.
41. Hellekant, G.; Ninomiya, Y.; Danilova, V., Taste in chimpanzees II: single chorda tympani fibers. Physiol. Behav. 1997, 61, (6), 829-841.
42. Danilova, V.; Hellekant, G.; Jin, Z. In Effect of miraculin on behavioral and single taste fibers responses in common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus jacchus., Chem Senses, Sarasota FL, 1998; Sarasota FL, 1998; p 550.
43. Hellekant, G.; Ninomiya, Y.; Danilova, V., Taste in chimpanzees III: Labeled line coding in sweet taste. Physiol. Behav. 1998, 65, (2), 191-200.
44. Danilova, V.; Hellekant, G., Elucidating coding of taste qualities with the taste modifier miraculin in the common marmoset. Brain Res Bull 2006, 68, (5), 315-321.
45. Hellekant, G.; Ninomiya, Y., On the taste of umami in chimpanzee. Physiology & Behavior 1991, 49, 927-934.
46. Ninomiya, Y.; Hellekant, G. In Specific taste sensitivity of single chorda tympani fibers in chimpanzee, Proc. Jpn. Symp. Taste and Smell 1991; 1991; pp 313-316.
47. Hellekant, G.; Ninomiya, Y., Bitter taste in single chorda tympani taste fibers from chimpanzee. Physiology & Behavior 1994, 56, (6), 1185-1188.
48. Hellekant, G.; Y., N., Umami taste in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkey (M. mulatta). In Olfaction and Taste XI, Kurihara, K.; Suzuki, N.; Ogawa, H., Eds. Springer Verlag: Tokyo, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, HongKong, Barcelona, Budapest, 1994; Vol. XI, pp 365-368.
49. Hellekant, G.; Danilova, V., Species differences toward sweeteners. Food Chem. 1996, 56, 323-328.
50. Danilova, V.; Hellekant, G.; Roberts, R.; Tinti, J. M.; Nofre, C., Behavioral and single chorda tympani taste fiber responses in the common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus jacchus. An. N Y Acad. Sci. Olfaction and Taste XII 1998, 855, 160-164.
51. Danilova, V.; Hellekant, G., Sense of taste in a New World monkey, the common marmoset. II. Link between behavior and nerve activity. J Neurophysiol 2004, 92, (2), 1067-1076.
52. Frank, M., Taste responses of single hamster chorda tympani nerve fibers. In Olfaction and Taste IV, Schneider, D., Ed. Wissenschaftliche: Stuttgart, 1972; Vol. IV, pp 287-293.
53. Frank, M. E., An analysis of hamster afferent taste nerve response functions. Journal of General Psychology 1973, 61, 588-618.
54. Nowlis, G. H.; Frank, M. E. In Qualities in hamster taste: behavioral and neural evidence, Olfaction and Taste VI, Paris, 1977; Paris, 1977; pp 241- 248.
55. Frank, M. E.; Bieber, S. L.; Smith, D. V., The organization of taste sensibilities in hamster chorda tympani nerve fibers. J. Gen. Physiol. 1988, 91, (6), 861-896.
56. Frank, M. E., Neuron types, receptors, behavior, and taste quality. Physiol Behav 2000, 69, (1-2), 53-62.
57. Frank, M. E.; Formaker, B. K.; Hettinger, T. P., Peripheral gustatory processing of sweet stimuli by golden hamsters. Brain Res Bull 2005, 66, (1), 70-84.
58. Danilova, V.; Hellekant, G., Oral sensation of ethanol in a primate model III: responses in the lingual branch of the trigeminal nerve of Macaca mulatta. Alcohol 2002, 26, (1), 3-16.