Brain and Behavior in Decision-Making

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2014, Pages

  Cassey, Peter ^a   Heathcote, Andrew ^a   Brown, Scott D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY;

ACCUMULATION MODEL; ADAPTIVE PROCESS; COGNITIVE MODEL; COGNITIVE THEORY; DECISIONS MAKINGS; EVIDENCE ACCUMULATION; MAKING DECISION; RESPONSE SELECTION; SINGLE CELL RECORDING; SPEED ACCURACY;

DECISION MAKING;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BRAIN NERVE CELL; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; HAPLORHINI; LOGIC; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; RECEPTIVE FIELD; RESPONSE TIME; SPEED ACCURACY TRADEOFF; SPIKE WAVE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; BRAIN; CYTOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BRAIN; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; HAPLORHINI; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL;

EID: 84905457389     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003700     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Wickelgren WA, (1977) Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica 41: 67-85.
2. Chittka L, Dyer AG, Bock F, Dornhaus A, (2003) Bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy. Nature 424: 388.
3. Uchida N, Mainen ZF, (2003) Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat. Nature Neuroscience 6: 1224-1229.
4. Rinberg D, Koulakov A, Gelperin A, (2006) Speed-accuracy tradeoff in olfaction. Neuron 51: 351-358.
5. Latty T, Beekman M, (2011) Speed-accuracy trade-offs during foraging decisions in the acellular slime mould physarum polycephalum. Proceedings of the Biological Sciences 278: 539-545.
6. Brown SD, Heathcote AJ, (2008) The simplest complete model of choice reaction time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology 57: 153-178.
7. Palmer J, Huk AC, Shadlen MN, (2005) The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. Journal of Vision 5: 376-404.
8. Ratcliff R, (1978) A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review 85: 59-108.
9. Ratcliff R, Rouder JN, (1998) Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science 9: 347-356.
10. Van Zandt T, Colonius H, Proctor RW, (2000) A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7: 208-256.
11. Ho TC, Yang G, Wu J, Cassey P, Brown SD, et al. (2014) Functional connectivity of negative emotional processing in adolescent depression. Journal of Affective Disorders 155: 65-74.
12. van Ravenzwaaij D, Dutilh G, Wagenmakers E-J, (2012) A diffusion model decomposition of the effects of alcohol on perceptual decision making. Psychopharmacology 219: 1017-1025.
13. Ratcliff R, Van Dongen HPA, (2011) Diffusion model for one-choice reaction-time tasks and the cognitive effects of sleep deprivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 11285-11290.
14. Glimcher PW, (2003) The neurobiology of visual-saccadic decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience 26: 133-179.
15. Shadlen MN, Kiani R, (2013) Decision making as a window on cognition. Neuron 80: 791-806.
16. Forstmann BU, Schafer A, Anwander A, Neumann J, Brown SD, et al. (2010) Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 15916-15920.
17. Forstmann BU, Dutilh G, Brown SD, Neumann J, von Cramon DY, et al. (2008) Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 17538-17542.
18. Mansfield EL, Karayanidis F, Jamadar S, Heathcote A, Forstmann BU, (2011) Adjustments of response threshold during task switching: a model-based functional magnetic resonance imaging study. The Journal of Neuroscience 31: 14688-14692.
19. Purcell BA, Schall JD, Logan GD, Palmeri TJ, (2012) From salience to saccades: multiple- alternative gated stochastic accumulator model of visual search. Journal of Neuroscience 32: 3433-3446.
20. van Maanen L, Brown SD, Eichele T, Wagenmakers E-J, Ho T, et al. (2011) Neural correlates of trial-to-trial fluctuations in response caution. The Journal of Neuroscience 31: 17488-17495.
21. van Veen V, Krug MK, Carter CS, (2008) The neural and computational basis of controlled speed-accuracy tradeoff during task performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20: 1952-1965.
22. Schall JD, (2003) Neural correlates of decision processes: neural and mental chronometry. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 13: 182-186.
23. Purcell BA, Heitz RP, Cohen JY, Schall JD, Logan GD, et al. (2010) Neurally constrained modeling of perceptual decision making. Psychological Review 117: 1113-1143.
24. Mazurek ME, Roitman JD, Ditterich J, Shadlen MN, (2003) A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. Cerebral Cortex 13: 1257-1269.
25. Turner BM, Forstmann BU, Wagenmakers E-J, Brown SD, Sederberg PB, et al. (2013) A Bayesian framework for simultaneously modeling neural and behavioral data. Neuroimage 72: 193-206.
26. Heitz RP, Schall JD, (2012) Neural mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff. Neuron 76: 616-628.
27. Luce RD (1986) Response Times. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Rae B, Heathcote AJ, Donkin C, Averell L, Brown SD, (2014) The hare and the tortoise: Emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition E-pub ahead of print.
29. Starns JJ, Ratcliff R, McKoon G, (2012) Evaluating the unequal-variability and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model. Cognitive Psychology 64: 1-34.
30. Starns JJ, Ratcliff R, White CN, (2012) Diffusion model drift rates can be inuenced by decision processes: An analysis of the strength-based mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38: 1137-1151.
31. Vandekerckhove J, Tuerlinckx F, Lee MD (2008) A Bayesian approach to diffusion process models of decision-making. In V. Sloutsky, B. Love, & K. McRae (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society: 1429-1434. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
32. Turner BM, Sederberg PB, Brown SD, Steyvers M, (2013) A method for effciently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions. Psychological Methods 18: 368-384.
33. Storn R, Price K, (1997) Differential evolution- a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization 11: 341-359.
34. Donkin C, Brown SD, Heathcote A, (2009) The overconstraint of response time models: Rethinking the scaling problem. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 16: 1129-1135.
35. Heitz RP, Schall JD, (2013) Neural chronometry and coherency across speed-accuracy demands reveal lack of homomorphism between computational and neural mechanisms of evidence accumulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B 368: 1471-2970.
36. Ratcliff R, (2006) Modeling response signal and response time data. Cognitive Psychology 53: 195-237.
37. Ratcliff R, Smith PL, (2004) A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review 111: 333-367.
38. Usher M, McClelland JL, (2001) On the time course of perceptual choice: The leaky competing accumulator model. Psychological Review 108: 550-592.
39. Starns JJ, Ratcliff R, (2010) The effects of aging on the speed-accuracy compromise: Boundary optimality in the diffusion model. Psychology and Aging 25: 377-390.