A Bayesian framework for simultaneously modeling neural and behavioral data

NeuroImage

Volumn 72, Issue , 2013, Pages 193-206

  Turner, Brandon M ^a   Forstmann, Birte U ^b   Wagenmakers, Eric Jan ^b   Brown, Scott D ^c   Sederberg, Per B ^d   Steyvers, Mark ^e  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^d OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive modeling; Hierarchical Bayesian estimation; Linear ballistic accumulator model; Neural constraints; Response time

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NEUROIMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SIMULATION;

BAYES THEOREM; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL;

EID: 84874529222     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.048     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Anderson J.R. How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe? 2007, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
2. Anderson J.R., Qin Y., Jung K.J., Carter C.S. Information-processing modules and their relative modality specificity. Cogn. Psychol. 2007, 54:185-217.
3. Anderson J.R., Carter C.S., Fincham J.M., Qin Y., Rosenberg-Lee M., S.M.R. Using fMRI to test models of complex cognition. Cogn. Sci. 2008, 32:1323-1348.
4. Anderson J.R., Betts S., Ferris J.L., Fincham J.M. Neural imaging to track mental states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:7018-7023.
5. Anderson J.R., Fincham J.M., Schneider D.W., Yang J. Using brain imaging to track problem solving in a complex state space. NeuroImage 2012, 60:633-643.
6. Behrens T., Johansen-Berg H., Woolrich M.W., Smith S.M., Wheeler-Kingshott C.A., Boulby P.A., Barker G.J., Sillery E.L., Sheehan K., Ciccarelli O., Thompson A.J., Brady J.M., Matthews P.M. Non-invasive mapping f connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6:750-757.
7. Bogacz R., Wagenmakers E.J., Forstmann B.U., Nieuwenhuis S. The neural basis of the speed-accuracy tradeoff. Trends Neurosci. 2010, 33:10-16.
8. Borst J., Anderson J.R. Towards pinpointing the neural correlates of ACT-R: a conjunction of two model-based fMRI analyses. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling 2012, (Berlin). N. Rubwinkel, U. Drewitz, H. van Rijn (Eds.).
9. Borst J.P., Taatgen N.A., Hedderik V.R. Using a symbolic process model as input for model-based fMRI analysis: locating the neural correlates of problem state replacement. NeuroImage 2011, 58:137-147.
10. Brown S., Heathcote A. A ballistic model of choice response time. Psychol. Rev. 2005, 112:117-128.
11. Brown S., Heathcote A. The simplest complete model of choice reaction time: linear ballistic accumulation. Cogn. Psychol. 2008, 57:153-178.
12. Dickey J.M. The weighted likelihood ratio, linear hypotheses on normal location parameters. Ann. Math. Stat. 1971, 42:204-223.
13. Dickey J.M., Lientz B.P. The weighted likelihood ratio, sharp hypotheses about chances, the order of a Markov chain. Ann. Math. Stat. 1970, 41:214-226.
14. Dolan R.J. Neuroimaging of cognition: past, present and future. Neuron 2008, 60:496-502.
15. Donkin C., Averell L., Brown S., Heathcote A. Getting more from accuracy and response time data: methods for fitting the linear ballistic accumulator. Behav. Res. Methods 2009, 41:1095-1110.
16. Donkin C., Brown S., Heathcote A. The overconstraint of response time models: rethinking the scaling problem. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2009, 16:1129-1135.
17. Donkin C., Heathcote A., Brown S. Is the linear ballistic accumulator model really the simplest model of choice response times: a Bayesian model complexity analysis. 9th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling - ICCM2009 2009, (Manchester, UK). A. Howes, D. Peebles, R. Cooper (Eds.).
18. Donkin C., Brown S., Heathcote A. Drawing conclusions from choice response time models: a tutorial. J. Math. Psychol. 2011, 55:140-151.
19. Egan J.P. Recognition memory and the operating characteristic. Tech. Rep. AFCRC-TN-58-51 1958, Hearing and Communication Laboratory, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
20. Fincham J.M., Anderson J.R., Betts S.A., Ferris J.L. Using neural imaging and cognitive modeling to infer mental states while using and intelligent tutoring system. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM2010) 2010, (Pittsburgh, PA).
21. Flandin G., Penny W.D. Bayesian fMRI data analysis with sparse spatial basis functions. NeuroImage 2007, 34:1108-1125.
22. Forstmann B.U., Dutilh G., Brown S., Neumann J., von Cramon D.Y., Ridderinkhof K.R., Wagenmakers E.-J. Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105:17538-17542.
23. Forstmann B.U., Anwander A., Schäfer A., Neumann J., Brown S., Wagenmakers E.-J., Bogacz R., Turner R. Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107:15916-15920.
24. Forstmann B.U., Tittgemeyer M., Wagenmakers E.-J., Derrfuss J., Imperati D., Brown S. The speed-accuracy tradeoff in the elderly brain: a structural model-based approach. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:17242-17249.
25. Frank L.R., Buxton R.B., Wong E.C. Probabilistic analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998, 39:132-148.
26. Friston K. Bayesian estimation of dynamical systems: an application to fMRI. NeuroImage 2002, 16:513-530.
27. Friston K.J., Penny W. Post hoc Bayesian model selection. NeuroImage 2011, 56:2089-2099.
28. Friston K., Penny W., Phillips C., Kiebel S., Hinton G., Ashburner J. Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging. NeuroImage 2002, 16:465-483.
29. Friston K., Harisson L., Penny W. Dynamic causal modeling. NeuroImage 2003, 19:1273-1302.
30. Gershman S.J., Blei D.M. A tutorial on Bayesian nonparametric models. J. Math. Psychol. 2012, 56:1-12.
31. Gershman S.J., Blei D.M., Pereira F., Norman K.A. A topographic latent source model for fMRI data. NeuroImage 2011, 57:89-100.
32. Gläscher J.P., O'Doherty Model-based approaches to neuroimaging: combining reinforcement learning theory with fMRI data. Wires Cognitive Science 2010, 1:501-510.
33. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics 1966, Wiley Press, New York.
34. Guo Y., Bowman F.D., Kilts C. Predicting the brain response to treatment using a Bayesian hierarchical model with application to a study of schizophrenia. Hum. Brain Map. 2008, 29:1092-1109.
35. Hampton A.N., Bossaerts P., O'Doherty J.P. The role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in abstract state-based inference during decision making in humans. J. Neurosci. 2006, 8360-8367.
36. Kershaw J., Ardekani B.A., Kanno I. Application of Bayesian inference to fMRI data analysis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1999, 18:1138-1153.
37. Kruschke J.K. Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R and BUGS 2011, Academic Press, Burlington, MA.
38. Lee M.D. Special issue on hierarchical Bayesian models. J. Math. Psychol. 2011, 55:1-118.
39. Ludwig C.J.H., Farrell S., Ellis L.A., Gilchrist I.D. The mechanism underlying inhibition of saccadic return. Cogn. Psychol. 2009, 59:180-202.
40. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection Theory: A User's Guide 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey.
41. Mazurek M.E., Roitman J.D., Ditterich J., Shadlen M.N. A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision making. Cereb. Cortex 2003, 13:1257-1269.
42. Mink J.W. The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Prog. Neurobiol. 1996, 50:381-425.
43. Mumford J.A., Turner B.O., Ashby F.G., Poldrack R.A. Deconvolving bold activation in event-related designs for multivoxel pattern classification analyses. NeuroImage 2012, 59:2636-2643.
44. Myung J.I., Pitt M.A. Optimal experimental design for model discrimination. Psychol. Rev. 2009, 116:499-518.
45. Navarro D.J., Griffiths T.L., Steyvers M., Lee M.D. Modeling individual differences using Dirichlet processes. J. Math. Psychol. 2006, 50:101-122.
46. Nosofsky R.M. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1986, 115:39-57.
47. O'Doherty J.P., Dayan P., Friston K., Critchley H., Dolan R.J. Temporal difference models and reward-related learning in the human brain. Neuron 2003, 28:329-337.
48. O'Doherty J.P., Hampton A., Kim H. Model-based fMRI and its application to reward learning and decision making. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2007, 1104:35-53.
49. Quirós A., Diez R.M., Gamerman D. Bayesian spatiotemporal model of fMRI data. NeuroImage 2010, 49:442-456.
50. Ratcliff R. A theory of memory retrieval. Psychol. Rev. 1978, 85:59-108.
51. Shiffrin R.M., Lee M.D., Kim W., Wagenmakers E.-J. A survey of model evaluation approaches with a tutorial on hierarchical Bayesian methods. Cogn. Sci. 2008, 32:1248-1284.
52. Smith Y., Bevan M.D., Shink E., Bolam J.P. Microcircuitry of the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia. Neuroscience 1998, 86:353-387.
53. Stephens M., Balding D.J. Bayesian statistical methods for genetic association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:681-690.
54. Stone M. Models for choice reaction time. Psychometrika 1960, 25:251-260.
55. ter Braak C.J.F. A Markov chain Monte Carlo version of the genetic algorithm differential evolution: easy Bayesian computing for real parameter spaces. Stat. Comput. 2006, 16:239-249.
56. Turner B.M., Sederberg P.B. Approximate Bayesian computation with differential evolution. J. Math. Psychol. 2012, 56:375-385.
57. Turner, B.M., Sederberg, P.B., Brown, S., Steyvers, M., in press. A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions. Psychological Methods.
58. Usher M., McClelland J.L. On the time course of perceptual choice: the leaky competing accumulator model. Psychol. Rev. 2001, 108:550-592.
59. Van Gerven M.A.J., Cseke B., de Lange F.P., Heskes T. Efficient Bayesian multivariate fMRI analysis using a sparsifying spatio-temporal prior. NeuroImage 2010, 50:150-161.
60. Wetzels R., Grasman R.P.P.P., Wagenmakers E.-J. An encompassing prior generalization of the Savage-Dickey density ratio. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2010, 54:2094-2102.
61. Wilkinson D., Halligan P. The relevance of behavioural measures for functional-imaging studies of cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 5:67-73.
62. Wu W., Chen Z., Gao S., Brown E.N. A hierarchical Bayesian approach for learning sparse spatio-temporal decompositions of multichannel EEG. NeuroImage 2011, 56:1929-1945.