Digital footprints: Opportunities and challenges for online social research

Annual Review of Sociology

Volumn 40, Issue , 2014, Pages 129-152

  Golder, Scott A ^a   Macy, Michael W ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

Internet; Online networks; Social media; Social networks; Web

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905253792     PISSN: 03600572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043145     Document Type: Review

References (145)

1. Adamic L, Adar E. 2005. How to search a social network. Soc. Netw. 27(3):187-203
2. Adamic LA, Glance N. 2005. The political blogosphere and the 2004 U. S. election: divided they blog. Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop Link Discov., pp. 36-43. New York: ACM
3. Anderson CJ, Wasserman S, Crouch B. 1999. A p* primer: logit models for social networks. Soc. Netw. 21(1):37-66
4. Anthony DL, Smith SW, Williamson T. 2009. Reputation and reliability in collective goods: the case of the online encyclopediaWikipedia. Ration. Soc. 21(3):283-306
5. Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A. 2009. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:21544-49
6. Backstrom L, Dwork C, Kleinberg J. 2007. Wherefore art thou R3579X? Anonymized social networks, hidden patterns, and structural steganography. Proc. 16th Int. Conf. WorldWideWeb, pp. 181-90. NewYork:ACM
7. Backstrom L, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Lan X. 2006. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth and evolution. Proc. 12th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min., pp. 44-54. New York: ACM
8. Backstrom L, Kleinberg J. 2014. Romantic partnerships and the dispersion of social ties: a network analysis of relationship status on Facebook. Proc. 17th ACM Conf. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW), Baltimore, MD, Feb. 15-19, pp. 831-41. New York: ACM
9. Bakshy E, Hofman JM, Mason WA, Watts DJ. 2011. Everyones an influencer: quantifying influence on Twitter. Proc. 4th ACM Int. Conf. Web Search Data Min., pp. 65-74. New York: ACM
10. Bakshy E, Rosenn I, Marlow C, Adamic L. 2012. The role of social networks in information diffusion. Proc. 21st Int. Conf. World Wide Web, pp. 519-28. New York: ACM
11. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3:993-1022
12. Bond RM, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Kramer ADI, Marlow C, et al. 2012. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489(7415):295-98
13. Borgatti SP, Halgin DS. 2011. On network theory. Organ. Sci. 22:1168-81
14. Boutyline A, Willer R. 2011. The social structure of political echo chambers: Ideology leads to asymmetries in online political communication networks. Work. Pap., Univ. Calif. Berkeley. http://www.ocf. berkeley. edu/ändrei/downloads/echo. pdf
15. boyd d, Crawford K. 2012. Critical questions for big data: provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15(5):662-79
16. boyd d, Ellison NB. 2007. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput. -Mediat. Commun. 13(1):210-30
17. boyd d, Golder SA, Lotan G. 2010. Tweet, tweet, retweet: conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. Proc. 43rd Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci. (HICSS-43), Kauai, HI, Jan. 6, pp. 1-10. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
18. Brashears ME. 2013. Humans use compression heuristics to improve the recall of social networks. Sci. Rep. 3:1513
19. Burt RS. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
20. Burt RS. 1997. A note on social capital and network content. Soc. Netw. 19:355
21. Butts CT. 2009. Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science 325:414-16
22. Centola D. 2010. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329:1194-97
23. Centola D. 2011. An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science 334(6060):1269-72
24. Centola D, Macy M. 2007. Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. Am. J. Sociol. 113(3):702-34
25. Cha M, Haddadi H, Benevenuto F, Gummadi KP. 2010. Measuring user influence in Twitter: the million follower fallacy. Proc. 4th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, pp. 10-17. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI
26. Choi B, Kraut R, Fichman M. 2008. Matching people and groups: recruitment and selection in online games. Work. Pap. No. 92, Human-Computer Interaction Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA. http://repository. cmu. edu/hcii/92
27. Compton R, Jurgens D, Allen D. 2014. Geotagging one hundred million Twitter accounts with total variation minimization. http://arxiv. org/abs/1404. 7152
28. Conover MD, Ratkiewicz J, Francisco M, Gonçalves B, Flammini A, Menczer F. 2011. Political polarization on Twitter. Proc. 5th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, pp. 89-96. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI
29. Contractor N. 2013. Someassembly required: leveragingWeb science to understand and enable team assembly. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 371:1987
30. Daft RL, Lengel RH. 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag. Sci. 32(5):554-71
31. Das S, Kramer A. 2013. Self-censorship on Facebook. Proc. 7th Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, pp. 120-27. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI
32. De Choudhury M, Mason WA, Hofman JM, Watts DJ. 2010. Inferring relevant social networks from interpersonal communication. Proc. 19th Int. Conf. World Wide Web (WWW2010), pp. 301-10. New York: ACM
33. de Montjoye Y-A, Hidalgo CA, VerleysenM, Blondel VD. 2013. Unique in the crowd: the privacy bounds of human mobility. Sci. Rep. 3:1376
34. Dean J, Ghemawat S. 2004. MapReduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Proc. OSDI04: 6th Symp. Oper. Syst. Des. Implement., pp. 137-49. Berkeley, CA: USENIX Assoc.
35. Della PostaD, Shi Y, Macy MW. 2013. Why do liberals drink lattes? Work. Pap., Cornell Univ. Soc. Dyn. Lab., Ithaca, NY
36. Digrazia J, McKelvey K, Bollen J, Rojas F. 2013. More tweets, more votes: social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. PLoS ONE 8:e70449
37. DiMaggio P, Hargittai E, Neuman WR, Robinson JP. 2001. Social implications of the Internet. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:307-36
38. Dodds PS, Muhamad R, Watts DJ. 2003. An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science 301:827-29
39. Duncan OD. 1966. Path analysis: sociological examples. Am. J. Sociol. 72(1):1-16
40. Eagle N, Macy MW, Claxton R. 2010. Network diversity and economic development. Science 328:1029-31
41. Emerson RM. 1962. Power-dependence relations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 27(1):31-41
42. Emerson RM. 1972. Exchange theory, part I and II. In Sociological Theories in Progress, Vol. II, ed. J Berger, M Zelditch, B Anderson, pp. 58-87. Boston: Houghton Mifflin
43. Entwisle B, Faust K, Rindfuss RR, Kaneda T. 2007. Networks and contexts: variation in the structure of social ties. Am. J. Sociol. 112(5):1495-533
44. Erickson T. 1999. Persistent conversation: an introduction. J. Comput. -Mediat. Commun. 4(4). doi: 10. 1111/j. 1083-6101. 1999. tb00105. x
45. Feliciano C, Robnett B, Komaie G. 2009. Gendered racial exclusion among white internet daters. Soc. Sci. Res. 38:39-54
46. Fischer CS. 2009. The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: an artifact? Am. Sociol. Rev. 74(4):657-69
47. Flynn FJ, Reagans RE, Guillory L. 2010. Do you two know each other? Transitivity, homophily and the need for (network) closure. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 99(5):855-69
48. Freeman LC. 1992. Filling in the blanks: a theory of cognitive categories and the structure of social affiliation. Soc. Psychol. Q. 55(2):118-27
49. Friedman E, Resnick P. 2001. The social cost of cheap pseudonyms. J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 10(2):173-99
50. Gayo-Avello D. 2012. No, you cannot predict elections with Twitter. IEEE Internet Comput. 16(6):91-94
51. Gilbert E, Karahalios K. 2009. Predicting tie strength with social media. Proc. 27th Int. Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst., pp. 211-20. New York: ACM
52. Gladwell M. 2000. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. New York: Little, Brown
53. Goffman E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor
54. Golder SA, Macy MW. 2011. Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep and daylength across diverse cultures. Science 333:1878-81
55. Golder SA, Wilkinson D, Huberman BA. 2007. Rhythms of social interaction: messaging within a massive online network. In Communities and Technologies 2007: Proceedings of the Third Communities and Technologies Conference, ed. C Steinfield, BT Pentland, M Ackerman, N Contractor, pp. 41-66. London: Springer
56. Golder SA, Yardi S. 2010. Structural predictors of tie formation in Twitter: transitivity and mutuality. Proc. 2nd IEEE Int. Conf. Soc. Comput., Aug. 20-22, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 88-95. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE
57. González-Bail ón S, Borge-Holthoefer J, Rivero A, Moreno Y. 2011. The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Sci. Rep. 1:197
58. Granovetter M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78:1360-80
59. Grinter RE, Palen L. 2002. Instant messaging in teen life. Proc. 2002 ACM Conf. Comput. -Support. Coop. Work, pp. 21-30. New York: ACM
60. Hampton K, Wellman B. 2003. Neighboring in netville: how the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City Community 2(4):277-311
61. Hargittai E. 2010. Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the net generation. Sociol. Inq. 80(1):92-113
62. Hechter M. 1988. Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
63. Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A. 2010. The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33:61-83
64. Herring SC. 1999. Interactional coherence in CMC. J. Comput. -Mediat. Commun. 4(4). doi: 10. 1111/j. 1083-6101. 1999. tb00106. x
65. Hollan J, Stornetta S. 1992. Beyond being there. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Hum. Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI92), pp. 119-25. New York: ACM
66. Homans GC. 1958. Social behavior as exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 63(6):597
67. Homans GC. 1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
68. Honeycutt C, Herring SC. 2009. Beyond microblogging: conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Proc. 42nd Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., pp. 1-10. Washington, DC: IEEE
69. Horrigan J. 2009. Home broadband adoption 2009. Rep. Pew Res. Cent., June 17, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC. http://www.pewinternet. org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/2009/Home-Broadband- Adoption-2009. pdf
70. Huberman BA. 2012. Sociology of science: Big data deserve a bigger audience. Nature 482:308
71. Huberman BA, Lock CH, Onculer A. 2004. Status as a valued resource. Soc. Psychol. Q. 67(1):103
72. Imbens GW, Angrist JD. 1994. Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 62(2):467
73. Jernigan C, Mistree BFT. 2009. Gaydar: Facebook friendships expose sexual orientation. First Monday 14(10)
74. Katz E, Lazarsfeld P. 1955. Personal Influence. New York: Free Press
75. Kollock P. 1999. The production of trust in online markets. In Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 16, ed. EJ Lawler, SR Thye, MW Macy, HAWalker, pp. 99-123. Greenwich, CT: JAI
76. Kossinets G, Watts DJ. 2006. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science 311:88-90
77. Kraut R, Kiesler S. 2003. The social impact of Internet use. Psychol. Sci. Agenda Summer, pp. 8-10
78. Krebs V. 2008. A network of books about recent US politics sold by the online bookseller Amazon. com. Case Stud., Orgnet. com. http://www.orgnet. com/divided.html
79. Kriplean T, Beschastnikh I, McDonald DW. 2008. Articulations of WikiWork: uncovering valued work in Wikipedia through barnstars. InCSCW 08: Proc. ACM2008 Conf. Comput. Support. Coop. Work, pp. 47-56. New York: ACM
80. Kriplean T, Beschastnikh I, McDonald D, Golder SA. 2007. Community, consensus, coercion, control: CSW or how policy mediates mass participation. Presented at ACM Group 2007, Nov. 4-7, Sanibel Island, FL. http://www.acm. org/conferences/group/conferences/group07
81. Kuhn TS. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press. 3rd ed.
82. Kwak H, Lee C, Park H, Moon S. 2010. What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? Proc. 19th Int. Conf. World Wide Web (WWW2010), pp. 591-600. New York: ACM
83. Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabási A-L, et al. 2009. Computational social science. Science 323:721-23
84. Leskovec J, Horvitz E. 2008. Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. Proc. 17th Int. Conf. World Wide Web, pp. 915-24. New York: ACM
85. Leskovec J, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J. 2010. Signed networks in social media. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. Syst. (CHI 2010), pp. 1361-70. New York: ACM
86. Lewis K, GonzalezM, Kaufman J. 2011. Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(1):68-72
87. Lewis K, Kaufman J, GonzalezM, Wimmer A, ChristakisN. 2008. Tastes, ties, and time: a new social network dataset using Facebook. com. Soc. Netw. 30:330-42
88. Lovelace RVE, Tyler GL. 2012. On the discovery of the period of the Crab nebula pulsar. Observatory 132(3):186-88
89. Lyman P, Wakeford N. 1999. Going into the (virtual) field. Am. Behav. Sci. 43(3):359-76
90. Macy MW, Willer R. 2002. From factors to actors: computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28(1):143-66
91. Manski CF. 1993. Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Rev. Econ. Stud. 60(3):531-42
92. Marsden PV. 1990. Network data and measurement. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 16:435-63
93. MasonW, Suri S. 2011. Conducting behavioral research on Amazons Mechanical Turk. Behav. Res. Methods 44:1-23
94. MasonW, Watts DJ. 2009. Financial incentives and the performance of crowds. Proc. ACM SIGKDD Worksh. Human Comput. (HCOMP 09), pp. 77-85. New York: ACM
95. Mayer A, Puller SL. 2008. The old boy (and girl) network: social network formation on university campuses. J. Public Econ. 92:329-47
96. McPherson M. 2004. A Blau space primer: prolegomenon to an ecology of affiliation. Ind. Corp. Change 13(1):263-80
97. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM. 2001. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:415-44
98. Menchik DA, Tian X. 2008. Putting social context into text: the semiotics of e-mail interaction. Am. J. Sociol. 114(2):332-70
99. Milgram S. 1967. The small-world problem. Psychol. Today 1(1):61-67
100. Nie NH, Hillygus DS. 2002. The impact of internet use on sociability: time-diary findings. IT Soc. 1(1):1-20
101. Onnela J-P, Saramaki J, Hyvonen J, Szab ó G, Lazer D, et al. 2007. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104(18):7332-36
102. Paccagnella L. 1997. Getting the seats of your pants dirty: strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. J. Comput. -Mediat. Commun. 3(1). doi: 10. 1111/j. 1083-6101. 1997. tb00065. x
103. Pang B, Lee L. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inform. Retr. 2(1-2):1-135
104. Pennebaker JW, Francis ME, BoothRJ. 2001. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC2001. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
105. Pinch TJ, Bijker WE. 1984. The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc. Stud. Sci. 14(3):399-441
106. Podolny JM. 2001. Networks as pipes and prisms of the market. Am. J. Sociol. 107(1):33-60
107. Preece J, Shneiderman B. 2009. The reader-to-leader framework: motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Trans. Hum. -Comput. Interact. 1(1):13-32
108. Pustejovsky JE, Spillane JP. 2009. Question-order effects in social network name generators. Soc. Netw. 31(4):221-29
109. Rainie L, Wellman B. 2012. Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
110. Rand DG. 2012. The promise of Mechanical Turk: how online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. J. Theor. Biol. 299:172-79
111. Robinson JP. 2011. IT use and leisure time displacement. Inf. Commun. Soc. 14(4):495-509
112. Robinson L. 2011. Information channel preferences and information opportunity structures. Inf. Commun. Soc. 14(4):472-94
113. Robnett B, Feliciano C. 2011. Patterns of racial-ethnic exclusion by internet daters. Soc. Forces 89(3):807-28
114. Romero DM, Meeder B, Kleinberg J. 2011. Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on Twitter. Proc. 20th Int. Conf. World Wide Web (WWW2011), pp. 695-704. New York: ACM
115. Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ. 2006. Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311:854-56
116. Salganik MJ, Watts DJ. 2009. Web-based experiments for the study of collective social dynamics in cultural markets. Top. Cogn. Sci. 1:439-68
117. Sears DO. 1986. College sophomores in the laboratory: influences of a narrow data base on social psychologys view of human nature. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 51(3):515-30
118. Shalizi CR, Thomas AC. 2011. Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociol. Methods Res. 40(2):211-39
119. Shannon C. 1956. The bandwagon. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 2:3
120. Smith A. 2011. 13% of online adults use Twitter and half of Twitter users access the service on a cell phone. Rep. Pew Res. Cent., June 1, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC. http://pewinternet. org/Reports/2011/Twitter-Update-2011. aspx
121. Smith A. 2012. The best (and worst) of mobile connectivity. Rep. Pew Res. Cent., Nov. 30, Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC. http://www.pewinternet. org/2012/11/30/the-best-and-worstof-mobile-connectivity
122. State B, Abrahao B, Cook K. 2012. From power to status in large scale online exchanges. Proc. 4th ACM Conf. Web Sci. (WebSci), June 22-24. New York: ACM
123. Sunstein CR. 2001. Republic. com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
124. Taylor LS, Mendelsohn GA, Fiore AT, Cheshire C. 2011. "Out of my league": a real-world test of the matching hypothesis. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 37:942-54
125. Traud AL, Kelsic ED, Mucha PJ, Porter MA. 2010. Comparing community structure to characteristics in online collegiate social networks. SIAM Rev. 53:526-43
126. Travers J, Milgram S. 1969. An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry 32(4):425-43
127. Ugander J, Backstrom L, Marlow C, Kleinberg J. 2012. Structural diversity in social contagion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(16):5962-66
128. Ugander J, Karrer B, Backstrom L, Marlow C. 2011. The anatomy of the Facebook social graph. http://arxiv. org/abs/1111. 4503
129. Van der Leij M, Goyal S. 2011. Strong ties in a small world. Rev. Netw. Econ. 10(2):1
130. Walther JB. 2007. Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23:2538-57
131. Wang J, Huffaker DA, Treem JW, Fullerton L, Ahmad MA, et al. 2011. Focused on the prize: characteristics of experts in massive multiplayer online games. First Monday 16(8). http://firstmonday. org/ojs/index. php/fm/article/viewArticle/3672/3028
132. Watts DJ. 2004. The "new" science of networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30:243-70
133. Watts DJ. 2011. Everything Is Obvious: How Common Sense Fails Us. New York: Crown Business
134. Weber I, Garimella VRK, Batayneh A. 2013. Secular versus Islamist polarization in Egypt on Twitter. Proc. IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. Adv. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min., pp. 290-97. New York: ACM
135. Weber M. 1922. Economy and Society. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
136. Wellman B, Hampton K. 1999. Living networked on and offline. Contemp. Sociol. 28(6):648-54
137. Welser HT, Cosley D, Kossinets G, Lin A, Dokshin F, et al. 2011. Finding social roles in Wikipedia. Proc. 2011 iConf., pp. 122-29. New York: ACM
138. Weng L, Menczer F, Ahn Y-Y. 2013. Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Sci. Rep. 3:2522
139. Willer R, Flynn FJ, Zak S. 2012. Structure, identity, and solidarity: a comparative field study of generalized and direct exchange. Adm. Sci. Q. 57(1):119-55
140. Wimmer A, Lewis K. 2010. Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. Am. J. Sociol. 116(2):583-642
141. Wright S. 1934. The method of path coefficients. Ann. Math. Stat. 5(3):161-215
142. Xie W, Li C, Zhu F, Lim E-P, Gong X. 2012. When a friend in Twitter is a friend in life. Proc. 3rd Annu. ACM Web Sci. Conf. -WebSci 12, pp. 344-47. New York: ACM
143. Yardi S, Romero DM, Schoenebeck G, boyd d. 2010. Detecting spam in a Twitter network. First Monday 15(1). http://firstmonday. org/ojs/index. php/fm/article/view/2793/2431
144. Zachary WW. 1977. An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. J. Anthropol. Res. 33:452-73
145. Zizzo DJ. 2010. Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Exp. Econ. 13(1):75-98