Rhythms of social interaction: Messaging within a massive online network

Proceedings of the 3rd Communities and Technologies Conference, C and T 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 41-66

  Golder, Scott A ^a   Wilkinson, Dennis M ^a   Hubennan, Bernardo A ^a  

^a HEWLETT PACKARD LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLEGE STUDENTS; DYNAMIC PATTERNS; ELECTRONIC DATA; FACEBOOK; ON-LINE NETWORK; SHARING INFORMATION; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); SOCIAL SCIENCES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84876539605     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84628-905-7_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. A. Acquisti and R. Gross. Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Robinson College, Cambridge University, UK, 2006.
2. J. Clapp, A. Shillin gton, and L. Segars. Deconstructing contexts of binge drinking among college students. Amer. J. Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 26(1):139- 154, 2000.
3. d. boyd. None of this is real: networked participation in friend ster. In J. Karaganis, editor, Structures of Participation. Duke U. P., 2007. to appear.
4. R. Dunbar. Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Languages. Harvard University Press, Cambrid ge, MA, 1998.
5. N. Ellison, C. Steinfeld, and C. Lampe. Spatially bounded online social networks and social capital: The role of Facebook. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference ofthe International Communication Association, 2006.
6. S. Feld. The focused organization of social ties. Amer. J. Sociology, 86(5): 1015- 1035, 1981.
7. S. Feld. Why your friends have more friends than you do. Amer. J. Sociology, 96(6): 1464-1477, 199 1.
8. M. Granovetter. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociology, 78(6):1360-1380, 1973.
9. R. Grinter and L. Palen. lm in teen life. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2002.
10. S. Jones. The internet goes to college. In Pew Internet and American Life Project, 2002.
11. J. Kaye, M. Levitt, J. Nevins, J. Golden, and V. Schmitt. Communicating intimacy one bit at a time. In CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2005.
12. K. Korgan, P. Odell, and P. Schumacher . Internet use among college students: are there differences by race/ethnicity? Electronic J. Sociology, 5(3), 2001.
13. N. Nie and D. S. Hillygus. The impact of internet use of socia bility: Timediary findings. IT and Society, 1(1): 1-20, 2002.
14. John A. Rice. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Duxbury Press, Belmont, California, 2nd edition, 1995.
15. R. Stinebrickner and T. Stinebrickner. Time-use and college outcomes. J. Econometrics, 121:243-269, 2004.
16. F. Stutzman. An evaluation of identit y-sharing behavior in social netwo rk communities. Intl. Digital Media and Arts Journal, to appear.
17. J. Tyler, D. Wilkinson, and B. Huberman. Email as spectroscopy: automated discovery of community structure within organizations. In M. Huysman, E. Wenger, and V. Wulf, editors, Communities and Technologies, pages 81- 96, Deventer, the Netherlands, 2003. Kluwer.
18. B. Wellman and K. Hampton. Living networked in a wired world. Contemporary Sociology, 28(6):648-654, 1999.