"out of my league": A real-world test of the matching hypothesis

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 942-954

  Shaw Taylor, Lindsay ^a   Fiore, Andrew T ^a   Mendelsohn, G A ^a   Cheshire, Coye ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

courtship; interpersonal attraction; matching hypothesis; online dating; self worth; similarity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COURTSHIP; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MARRIAGE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COURTSHIP; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MARRIAGE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957960954     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167211409947     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, G.W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 173-189.
2. Brislin, R.W., & Lewis, S.A. (1968). Dating and physical attractiveness: Replication. Psychological Reports, 22, 976-976.
3. Buss, D.M., & Shackelford, T.K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134-146.
4. Cook, S., Cheshire, C., Gerbasi, A., & Aven, B. (2009). Assessing trustworthiness in providers of online goods and services. In K. S. Cook, C. Snijders, V. Buskins, & C. Cheshire (Eds.), eTrust: Forming relationships in the online world (pp. 189-214). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
5. Curran, J.P., & Lippold, S. (1975). The effects of physical attraction and attitude similarity on attraction in dating dyads. Journal of Personality, 43, 528-539.
6. Eastwick, P.W., & Finkel, E.J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245-264.
7. Fiore, A.T., Shaw Taylor, L., Mendelsohn, G.A., & Hearst, M. (2008, April). Assessing attractiveness in online dating profiles. Paper presented at the ACM Computer-Human Interaction conference, Florence, Italy.
8. Gleitman, H., Reisberg, D., & Gross, J. (2007). Psychology (7th ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
9. Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., & Swann, W.B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
10. Heino, R., Ellison, N., & Gibbs, J. (2010). Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 427-447.
11. Hitsch, G.J., Hortacsu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010). Matching and sorting in online dating. American Economic Review, 100, 130-163.
12. Huston, T.L. (1973). Ambiguity of acceptance, social desirability, and dating choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 32-42.
13. Kalick, S.M., & Hamilton, T.E. (1986). The matching hypothesis reexamined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 673-682.
14. Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). If I'm not hot, are you hot or not? Physical-attractiveness evaluations and dating preferences as a function of one's own attractiveness. Psychological Science, 19, 669-677.
15. Luo, S., & Klohnen, E.C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 304-326.
16. McKillip, J., & Redel, S.L. (1983). External validity of matching on physical attractiveness for same and opposite sex couples. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 328-337.
17. Montoya, R.M. (2008). I'm hot, so I say you're not: The influence of objective physical attractiveness on mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1315-1329.
18. Montoya, R.M., Horton, R.S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889-922.
19. Murstein, B.I. (1970). Stimulus value role: A theory of marital choice. Journal of Marriage and Family, 32, 465-481.
20. Myers, D.G. (1996). Social psychology (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
21. Robins, R.W., Hendin, H.M., & Trzesniewski, K.H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 151-161.
22. Rosenfeld, M.J., & Thomas, R.J. (2010). Meeting online: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. Retrieved fromhttp://www.stanford.edu/~mrosenfe/Rosenfeld_How_Couples_Meet_Working_Paper.pdf.
23. Sprecher, S., & Hatfield, E. (2009). Matching hypothesis. In H. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships (pp. 1065-1067). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Stroebe, W., Insko, C.A., Thompson, V.D., & Layton, B.D. (1971). Effects of physical attractiveness, attitude similarity, and sex on various aspects of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 79-91.
25. Thibaut, J.W., & Kelley, H.H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: John Wiley.
26. van Straaten, I., Engels, R.C.M.E., Finkenauer, C., & Holland, R.W. (2009). Meeting your match: How attractiveness similarity affects approach behavior in mixed-sex dyads. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 685-697.
27. Walster, E. (1970). The effect of self-esteem on liking for dates of various social desirabilities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 248-253.
28. Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 508-516.
29. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G.W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151-176.
30. Walster, E., Walster, G.W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
31. Watson, D., Klohnen, E.C., Casillas, A., Nus Simms, E., Haig, J., & Berry, D.S. (2004). Match makers and deal breakers: Analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 72, 1029-1068.