Wildfire-contingent effects of fuel treatments can promote ecological resilience in seasonally dry conifer forests

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 44, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 843-854

  Stevens, Jens T ^a   Safford, Hugh D ^a,b   Latimer, Andrew M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

California; Forests; Fuel treatments; Mixed conifer; Resilience; Restoration; Wildfire; Yellow pine

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; FIRES; FUELS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; RESTORATION; SOIL MOISTURE;

CALIFORNIA; FORESTS; FUEL TREATMENTS; MIXED CONIFER; RESILIENCE; WILDFIRE; YELLOW PINE;

REFORESTATION;

ABUNDANCE; CONIFEROUS FOREST; ECOSYSTEM RESILIENCE; FIRE BEHAVIOR; MIXED FOREST; OVERSTORY; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; WILDFIRE; WOODY PLANT;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84905010298     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: 12086037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0460     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Agee, J. K., and Skinner, C. N. 2005. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 211(1-2): 83-96. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2005. 01. 034.
2. Allen, C. D., Savage, M., Falk, D. A., Suckling, K. F., Swetnam, T. W., Schulke, T., Stacey, P. B., Morgan, P., Hoffman, M., and Klingel, J. T. 2002. Ecological restoration of Southwestern ponderosa pine ecosystems: a broad perspective. Ecol. Appl. 12(5): 1418-1433. doi: 10. 1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1418: EROSPP]2. 0. CO; 2.
3. Barbour, M. G., Keeler-Wolf, T., and Schoenherr, A. A. 2007. Terrestrial vegetation of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
4. Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M., and Walker, S. 2013. lme4: Linear mixedeffects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1. 0-5. Available from http://cran. r-project. org/web/packages/lme4/index. html.
5. Beisner, B. E., Haydon, D. T., and Cuddington, K. 2003. Alternative stable states in ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1(7): 376-382. doi: 10. 1890/1540-9295(2003)001 [0376: ASSIE]2. 0. CO; 2.
6. Bolker, B. M. 2008. Ecological models and data in R. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
7. Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., and White, J.-S. S. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24(3): 127-135. doi: 10. 1016/j. tree. 2008. 10. 008.
8. Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. 2004. Multimodal inference: understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol. Meth. Res. 33: 261-304. doi: 10. 1177/0049124104268644.
9. Cam, E., Link, W. A., Cooch, E. G., Monnat, J. Y., and Danchin, E. 2002. Individual covariation in life-history traits: seeing the trees despite the forest. Am. Nat. 159(1): 96-105. doi: 10. 1086/324126.
10. Campbell, J. L., Harmon, M. E., and Mitchell, S. R. 2012. Can fuel-reduction treatments really increase forest carbon storage in the western US by reducing future fire emissions? Front. Ecol. Environ. 10(2): 83-90. doi: 10. 1890/110057.
11. Carlson, C., Dobrowski, S., and Safford, H. 2012. Variation in tree mortality and regeneration affect forest carbon recovery following fuel treatments and wildfire in the Lake Tahoe Basin, California, U. S. A. Carbon Balance Manage. 7(1): 7. doi: 10. 1186/1750-0680-7-7.
12. Cerda, A., and Doerr, S. H. 2008. The effect of ash and needle cover on surface runoff and erosion in the immediate post-fire period. Catena, 74(3): 256-263. doi: 10. 1016/j. catena. 2008. 03. 010.
13. Collins, B. M., and Stephens, S. L. 2007. Managing natural wildfires in Sierra Nevada wilderness areas. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5(10): 523-527. doi: 10. 1890/070007.
14. Donato, D. C., Fontaine, J. B., Robinson, W. D., Kauffman, J. B., and Law, B. E. 2009. Vegetation response to a short interval between high-severity wildfires in a mixed-evergreen forest. J. Ecol. 97(1): 142-154. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2745. 2008. 01456. x.
15. Franklin, J. F. 1961. A guide to seedling identification for 25 conifers of the Pacific Northwest. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon.
16. Franklin, J. 2010. Vegetation dynamics and exotic plant invasion following high severity crown fire in a southern California conifer forest. Plant Ecol. 207(2): 281-295. doi: 10. 1007/s11258-009-9672-6.
17. Fulé, P. Z., Covington, W. W., Smith, H. B., Springer, J. D., Heinlein, T. A., Huisinga, K. D., and Moore, M. M. 2002. Comparing ecological restoration alternatives: Grand Canyon, Arizona. For. Ecol. Manage. 170(1-3): 19-41. doi: 10. 1016/S0378-1127(01)00759-9.
18. Fulé, P. Z., Cocke, A. E., Heinlein, T. A., and Covington, W. W. 2004. Effects of an intense prescribed forest fire: is it ecological restoration. Restor. Ecol. 12(2): 220-230. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1061-2971. 2004. 00283. x.
19. Fulé, P. Z., Crouse, J. E., Roccaforte, J. P., and Kalies, E. L. 2012. Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western U. S. A. ponderosa or Jeffrey pine-dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior? For. Ecol. Manage. 269: 68-81. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2011. 12. 025.
20. Gilks, W. R., Wang, C. C., Yvonnet, B., and Coursaget, P. 1993. Random-effects models for longitudinal data using Gibbs sampling. Biometrics, 49(2): 441-453. doi: 10. 2307/2532557.
21. Hall, S. A., Burke, I. C., and Hobbs, N. T. 2006. Litter and dead wood dynamics in ponderosa pine forests along a 160-year chronosequence. Ecol. Appl. 16(6): 2344-2355. doi: 10. 1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2344: LADWDI]2. 0. CO; 2.
22. Hood, S. M. 2010. Mitigating old tree mortality in long-unburned, fire-dependent forests: a synthesis. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-238.
23. Jennings, S. B., Brown, N. D., and Sheil, D. 1999. Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. Forestry, 72(1): 59-73. doi: 10. 1093/forestry/72. 1. 59.
24. Lee, D. C., and Irwin, L. L. 2005. Assessing risks to spotted owls from forest thinning in fire-adapted forests of the western United States. For. Ecol. Manage. 211(1-2): 191-209. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2005. 02. 001.
25. Lezberg, A. L., Battaglia, M. A., Shepperd, W. D., and Schoettle, A. W. 2008. Decades-old silvicultural treatments influence surface wildfire severity and post-fire nitrogen availability in a ponderosa pine forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 255(1): 49-61. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2007. 08. 019.
26. Mallek, C., Safford, H., Viers, J., and Miller, J. 2013. Modern departures in fire severity and area vary by forest type, Sierra Nevada and southern Cascades, California, U. S. A. Ecosphere, 4(12): article 153. doi: 10. 1890/ES13-00217. 1.
27. Martinson, E. J., and Omi, P. N. 2013. Fuel treatments and fire severity: a metaanalysis. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, Research Paper RMRS-RP-103WWW.
28. McKelvey, K. S., Skinner, C. N., Chang, C., Erman, D. C., Hussari, S. J., Parsons, D. J., van Wagtendonk, J. W., and Weatherspoon, C. P. 1996. An overview of fire in the Sierra Nevada. In Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: final report to Congress. Vol. II. Assessments and scientific basis for management options. University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, Davis, California.
29. Miller, J. D., Safford, H. D., Crimmins, M., and Thode, A. E. 2009. Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, U. S. A. Ecosystems, 12(1): 16-32. doi: 10. 1007/s10021-008-9201-9.
30. Moghaddas, J. J., and Craggs, L. 2007. A fuel treatment reduces fire severity and increases suppression efficiency in a mixed conifer forest. Int. J. Wildland Fire, 16(6): 673-678. doi: 10. 1071/WF06066.
31. North, M., Hurteau, M., and Innes, J. 2009a. Fire suppression and fuels treatment effects on mixed-conifer carbon stocks and emissions. Ecol. Appl. 19(6): 1385-1396. doi: 10. 1890/08-1173. 1.
32. North, M., Stine, P., O'Hara, K., Zielinski, W., and Stephens, S. L. 2009b. An ecosystem management strategy for Sierran mixed-conifer forests. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-220.
33. North, M., Collins, B. M., and Stephens, S. 2012. Using fire to increase the scale, benefits, and future maintenance of fuels treatments. J. For. 110(7): 392-401. doi: 10. 5849/jof. 12-021.
34. Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R., O'Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., and Wagner, H. 2011. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2. 0-2. Available from http://cran. r-project. org/web/packages/vegan/index. html.
35. Pilliod, D. S., Bull, E. L., Hayes, J. L., and Wales, B. C. 2006. Wildlife and invertebrate response to fuel reduction treatments in dry coniferous forests of the western United States: a synthesis. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-173.
36. Pinheiro, J. C., and Bates, D. M. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York.
37. Pollet, J., and Omi, P. N. 2002. Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on crown fire severity in ponderosa pine forests. Int. J. Wildland Fire, 11(1): 1-10. doi: 10. 1071/WF01045.
38. Prichard, S. J., Peterson, D. L., and Jacobson, K. 2010. Fuel treatments reduce the severity of wildfire effects in dry mixed conifer forest, Washington, U. S. A. Can. J. For. Res. 40(8): 1615-1626. doi: 10. 1139/X10-109.
39. Reinhardt, E. D., Keane, R. E., Calkin, D. E., and Cohen, J. D. 2008. Objectives and considerations for wildland fuel treatment in forested ecosystems of the interior western United States. For. Ecol. Manage. 256(12): 1997-2006. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2008. 09. 016.
40. Ritchie, M. W., Skinner, C. N., and Hamilton, T. A. 2007. Probability of tree survival after wildfire in an interior pine forest of northern California: effects of thinning and prescribed fire. For. Ecol. Manage. 247(1-3): 200-208. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2007. 04. 044.
41. Ryu, S. R., Concilio, A., Chen, J. Q., North, M., and Ma, S. Y. 2009. Prescribed burning and mechanical thinning effects on belowground conditions and soil respiration in a mixed-conifer forest, California. For. Ecol. Manage. 257(4): 1324-1332. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2008. 11. 033.
42. Safford, H. D., Stevens, J. T., Merriam, K., Meyer, M. D., and Latimer, A. M. 2012. Fuel treatment effectiveness in California yellow pine and mixed conifer forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 274: 17-28. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2012. 02. 013.
43. Savage, M., and Mast, J. N. 2005. How resilient are southwestern ponderosa pine forests after crown fires? Can. J. For. Res. 35(4): 967-977. doi: 10. 1139/x05-028.
44. Schmidt, D. A., Taylor, A. H., and Skinner, C. N. 2008. The influence of fuels treatment and landscape arrangement on simulated fire behavior, Southern Cascade range, California. For. Ecol. Manage. 255(8-9): 3170-3184. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2008. 01. 023.
45. Schoennagel, T., and Nelson, C. R. 2011. Restoration relevance of recent National Fire Plan treatments in forests of the western United States. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9(5): 271-277. doi: 10. 1890/090199.
46. Scholl, A. E., and Taylor, A. H. 2010. Fire regimes, forest change, and selforganization in an old-growth mixed-conifer forest, Yosemite National Park, U. S. A. Ecol. Appl. 20(2): 362-380. doi: 10. 1890/08-2324. 1.
47. Schwilk, D. W., Keeley, J. E., Knapp, E. E., McIver, J., Bailey, J. D., Fettig, C. J., Fiedler, C. E., Harrod, R. J., Moghaddas, J. J., Outcalt, K. W., Skinner, C. N., Stephens, S. L., Waldrop, T. A., Yaussy, D. A., and Youngblood, A. 2009. The National Fire and Fire Surrogate study: effects of fuel reduction methods on forest vegetation structure and fuels. Ecol. Appl. 19(2): 285-304. doi: 10. 1890/07-1747. 1.
48. Shive, K. L., Sieg, C. H., and Fule, P. Z. 2013. Pre-wildfire management treatments interact with fire severity to have lasting effects on post-wildfire vegetation response. For. Ecol. Manage. 297: 75-83. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2013. 02. 021.
49. Stephens, S. L., and Moghaddas, J. J. 2005. Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a California mixed conifer forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 215(1-3): 21-36. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2005. 03. 070.
50. Stephens, S. L., and Ruth, L. W. 2005. Federal forest-fire policy in the United States. Ecol. Appl. 15(2): 532-542. doi: 10. 1890/04-0545.
51. Stephens, S. L., Martin, R. E., and Clinton, N. E. 2007. Prehistoric fire area and emissions from California's forests, woodlands, shrublands, and grasslands. For. Ecol. Manage. 251: 205-216. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2007. 06. 005.
52. Stephens, S. L., Fry, D. L., and Franco-Vizcaino, E. 2008. Wildfire and spatial patterns in forests in northwestern Mexico: the United States wishes it had similar fire problems. Ecol. Soc. 13(2): 10.
53. Stephens, S. L., Moghaddas, J. J., Edminster, C., Fiedler, C. E., Haase, S., Harrington, M., Keeley, J. E., Knapp, E. E., McIver, J. D., Metlen, K., Skinner, C. N., and Youngblood, A. 2009. Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western US forests. Ecol. Appl. 19(2): 305-320. doi: 10. 1890/07-1755. 1.
54. Stephens, S. L., McIver, J. D., Boerner, R. E. J., Fettig, C. J., Fontaine, J. B., Hartsough, B. R., Kennedy, P. L., and Schwilk, D. W. 2012. The effects of forest fuel-reduction treatments in the United States. BioScience, 62(6): 549-560. doi: 10. 1525/bio. 2012. 62. 6. 6.
55. Suding, K. N., Gross, K. L., and Houseman, G. R. 2004. Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19(1): 46-53. doi: 10. 1016/j. tree. 2003. 10. 005.
56. Sudworth, G. B. 1900. Stanislaus and Lake Tahoe Forest Reserves, California and adjacent territory. Annual Report of the US Geological Survey, 21(5): 505-561.
57. Sugihara, N. G., van Wagtendonk, J. W., Shaffer, K. E., Fites-Kaufman, J., and Thode, A. E. 2006. Fire in California's ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
58. Swanson, M. E., Franklin, J. F., Beschta, R. L., Crisafulli, C. M., DellaSala, D. A., Hutto, R. L., Lindenmayer, D. B., and Swanson, F. J. 2011. The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9(2): 117-125. doi: 10. 1890/090157.
59. Syphard, A. D., Keeley, J. E., and Brennan, T. J. 2011. Factors affecting fuel break effectiveness in the control of large fires on the Los Padres National Forest, California. Int. J. Wildland Fire, 20(6): 764-775. doi: 10. 1071/WF10065.
60. Thompson, J., and Spies, T. 2010. Factors associated with crown damage following recurring mixed-severity wildfires and post-fire management in southwestern Oregon. Landsc. Ecol. 25(5): 775-789. doi: 10. 1007/s10980-010-9456-3.
61. Thorne, J. H., Morgan, B. J., and Kennedy, J. A. 2008. Vegetation change over sixty years in the Central Sierra Nevada, California, U. S. A. Madroño, 55(3): 223-237. doi: 10. 3120/0024-9637-55. 3. 223.
62. Vaillant, N. M., Fites-Kaufman, J., Reiner, A. L., Noonan-Wright, E. K., and Dailey, S. N. 2009. Effect of fuel treatments on fuels and potential fire behavior in California, U. S. A., National Forests. Fire Ecol. 5(2): 14-29. doi: 10. 4996/fireecology. 0502014.
63. Van de Water, K. M., and Safford, H. D. 2011. A summary of fire frequency estimates for California vegetation before Euro-American settlement. Fire Ecol. 7(3): 26-58. doi: 10. 4996/fireecology. 0703026.
64. Van Leeuwen, W. J. D. 2008. Monitoring the effects of forest restoration treatments on post-fire vegetation recovery with MODIS multitemporal data. Sensors, 8(3): 2017-2042. doi: 10. 3390/s8032017.
65. Wayman, R. B., and North, M. 2007. Initial response of a mixed-conifer understory plant community to burning and thinning restoration treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 239(1-3): 32-44. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2006. 11. 011.
66. Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R., and Swetnam, T. W. 2006. Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science, 313(5789): 940-943. doi: 10. 1126/science. 1128834.
67. Winford, E. M., and Gaither, J. C. 2012. Carbon outcomes from fuels treatment and bioenergy production in a Sierra Nevada forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 282: 1-9. doi: 10. 1016/j. foreco. 2012. 06. 025.