The influence of fuels treatment and landscape arrangement on simulated fire behavior, Southern Cascade range, California

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 255, Issue 8-9, 2008, Pages 3170-3184

  Schmidt, David A ^a,b   Taylor, Alan H ^a   Skinner, Carl N ^c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

FARSITE; Fire behavior; Fire hazard; Fuels management; Fuels treatment; Landscape burning; Mixed conifer forests; NEXUS

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FIRE HAZARDS; FUEL CONSUMPTION; VEGETABLE OILS;

FIRE BEHAVIOR; FUELS MANAGEMENT; FUELS TREATMENT; LANDSCAPE BURNING; MIXED-CONIFER FORESTS;

FORESTRY;

CONIFEROUS FOREST; FIRE BEHAVIOR; FUEL; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MIXED FOREST; PRESCRIBED BURNING; SILVICULTURE; THINNING; WILDFIRE;

FOREST FIRES; FOREST MANAGEMENT; SILVICULTURE; THINNING;

CALIFORNIA; CASCADE RANGE; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

CONIFEROPHYTA;

EID: 43049178378     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.023     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Agee J.K. Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests (1993), Island Press, Washington, DC
2. Agee J.K., and Skinner C.N. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 211 (2005) 83-96
3. Agee J.K., Bahro B., Finney M.A., Omi P.N., Sapsis D.B., Skinner C.N., van Wagtendonk J.W., and Weatherspoon C.P. The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management. For. Ecol. Manage. 127 (2000) 55-66
4. Agee J.K., Wright C.S., Williamson N., and Huff M.H. Foliar moisture content of Pacific Northwest vegetation and its relation to wildland fire behavior. For. Ecol. Manage. 167 (2002) 57-66
5. Anderson, H.E., 1982. Aids to determining fuel models. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-122.
6. Arno S.F., and Allison-Bunnell S. Flames in our Forest: Disaster or Renewal (2002), Island Press, Washington, DC
7. Bahro, B., Barber, K.H., Sherlock, J.W., Yasuda, D.A., 2007. Stewardship and fireshed assessment: a process for designing a landscape fuel treatment strategy. In: Powers, R. F. (Ed.), Restoring fire-adapted ecosystems: Proceedings of the 2005 National Silviculture Workshop. USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station, General Technical Report PSW-GTR-203, pp. 41-54.
8. Biswell H.H. Prescribed Burning in California Wildlands Vegetation Management (1989), University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA
9. Bradshaw, L., McCormick, E., 2000. FireFamily Plus user's guide, Version 2.0. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, General Technical Report RMRS-67WWW.
10. Brown, J.K., 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-16.
11. Burgan, R.E., Rothermel, R.C., 1984. BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system FUEL subsystem. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-167.
12. Covington W.W., and Moore M.M. Southwestern ponderosa pine forest structure: changes since Euro-American settlement. J. For. 92 (1994) 39-47
13. Dodge M. Forest fuel accumulation-a growing problem. Science 177 (1972) 139-142
14. Finney M.A. Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behavior. For. Sci. 47 (2001) 219-228
15. Finney, M.A., 2004. FARSITE: fire area simulator-model development and evaluation (Revised 2004). USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Research Paper RMRS-4.
16. Finney, M.A., Cohen, J.D., 2003. Expectation and evaluation of fuel management objectives. In: Omi, P.N., Joyce, L.A. (Eds.) Fire, Fuel Treatments, and Ecological Restoration. Proceedings RMRS-P-29. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, pp. 353-366.
17. Finney M.A., McHugh C.W., and Grenfell I.C. Stand and landscape-level effects of prescribed burning in two Arizona wildfires. Can. J. For. Res. 35 (2005) 1714-1722
18. Fulé P.Z., Crouse J.E., Cocke A.E., Moore M.M., and Covington W.W. Changes in canopy fuels and potential fire behavior 1880-2040: Grand Canyon, Arizona. Ecol. Model. 175 (2004) 231-248
19. Fulé P.Z., Waltz A.E.M., Covington W.W., and Heinlein T.A. Measuring forest restoration effectiveness in reducing hazardous fuels. J. For. 99 (2001) 24-29
20. Graham, R.T., Harvey, A.E., Jain, T.B, Tonn, J.R., 1999. The effects of thinning and similar stand treatments on fire behavior in Western forests. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-463.
21. Graham, R.T., McCaffrey, T.S., Jain, T.B., 2004. Science basis for changing forest structure to modify wildfire behavior and severity. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. General Technical Report RMRS-120.
22. Green L.R. Fuelbreaks and Other Fuel Modification for Wildland Fire Control. Agriculture Handbook 499 (1977), USDA Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
23. Hardy C. Wildfire hazard and risk: problems, definitions, and context. For. Ecol. Manage. 211 (2005) 73-82
24. Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003. P.L. 108-148. http://www.healthyforests.gov/initiative/legislation.html (last accessed 15 July 2005).
25. In: Hickman J.C. (Ed). The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California (1993), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
26. Husari S., Nichols H.T., Sugihara N.G., van Wagtendonk J.W., Schaffer K.E., Fites-Kaufman J., and Stephens S.L. Fire and fuel management. In: Sugihara N.S., van Wagtendonk J.W., Shaffer K.E., Fites-Kaufman J., and Thode A.E. (Eds). Fire in California's Ecosystems (2006), University of California Press, Berkeley 444-465
27. Kiefer M., van Wagtendonk J.W., and Buhler N. Long-term surface fuel accumulation in burned and unburned mixed conifer forests of the central and southern Sierra Nevada, CA (USA). Fire Ecol. 2 (2006) 53-72
28. Loehle C. Applying landscape principles to fire hazard reduction. For. Ecol. Manage. 198 (2004) 261-267
29. Martin, R.E., Kauffman, J.B., Landsberg, J.D., 1989. Use of prescribed fire to reduce wildfire potential. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, General Technical Report PSW-109.
30. Martinson, E.J., Omi, P.N., 2003. Performance of fuel treatments subjected to wildfires. In: Omi, P.N., Joyce, L.A. (Eds.), Fire, Fuel Treatments, and Ecological Restoration. Proceedings RMRS-P-29. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, pp. 7-13.
31. Martinson, E.J., Omi, P.N., Shepperd, W., 2003. Effects of fuel treatments on fire severity. In: Graham, R.T. (Ed.), Hayman Fire Case Study. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-114. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, pp. 96-126.
32. McIver J.D., Adams P.W., Doyal J.A., Drews E.S., Hartsough B.R., Kellogg L.D., Niwa C.G., Ottmar R., Peck R., Taratoot M., Torgersen T., and Youngblood A. Environmental effects and economics of mechanized logging for fuel reduction in northeastern Oregon mixed-conifer stands West. J. Appl. For. 18 (2003) 238-249
33. Miles, S.R., Goudey, C.B., 1998. Ecological subregions of California, section and subsection descriptions. http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/projects/ecoregions/ (last accessed 15 July 2005).
34. Nagel T.A., and Taylor A.H. Fire and persistence of montane chaparral in mixed conifer forest landscapes in the northern Sierra Nevada, Lake Tahoe Basin, California. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 132 (2005) 442-457
35. National Fire Plan, 2001. U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.fireplan.gov/ (last accessed 15 July 2005).
36. NWCG [National Wildfire Coordinating Group]. Review and Update of the 1995 Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy (2001), National Interagency Fire Center, Boise, Idaho, USA
37. Olson, R., 1977. Appraising a forest fuel treatment: the DFPZ concept, Lassen National Forest. Unpublished report on file Lassen National Forest Supervisors Office, Susanville, California.
38. Omi P.N. The role of fuelbreaks. Proceedings of the 17th Forest Vegetation Management Conference. Churn Creek Vegetation Management Inc., Redding, CA (1996) 89-96
39. Omi, P.N., Martinson, E.J., 2002. Effect of fuel treatment on wildfire severity. http://www.cnr.colostate.edu/frws/research/westfire/FinalReport.pdf (last accessed 16 April 2005).
40. Quincy Library Group, 1994. Fuels management for fire protection. http://www.qlg.org/pub/agree/penney.htm (last accessed 13 April 2004).
41. Raymond C.L., and Peterson D.L. Fuel treatments alter the effects of wildfire in a mixed-evergreen forest, Oregon, USA. Can. J. For. Res. 12 (2005) 2981-2995
42. Reinhardt, E.D., Crookston, N.L. (Eds.), 2003. The Fire and Fuels Extension to the Forest Vegetation Simulator. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-116. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
43. Ritchie, M.W., 2005. Ecological Research at the Goosenest Adaptive Management Area in Northeastern California. General Technical Report PSW-192. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station.
44. Ritchie, M.W., Harcksen, K.A., 2005. Accelerating development of late-successional features in second-growth pine stands of the Goosenest Adaptive Management Area. In: Ritchie, M.W., Maguire, D.A., Youngblood, A. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Symposium on Ponderosa Pine: Issues, Trends, and Management. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-198. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, pp. 81-93.
45. Ritchie M.W., Skinner C.N., and Hamilton T.A. Probability of wildfire-induced tree mortality in an interior pine forest: effects of thinning and prescribed fire. For. Ecol. Manage. 247 (2007) 200-208
46. Rothermel, R.C., 1983. How to predict the spread and intensity of wildfires. General Technical Report INT-143. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
47. Rothermel, R.C., Rinehart, G.C., 1983. Field procedures for verification and adjustment of fire behavior predictions. General Technical Report INT-142. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station.
48. Rundel P., Parsons D., and Gordon D. Montane and subalpine vegetation of the Sierra Nevada and Cascade ranges. In: Barbour M.G., and Major J. (Eds). Terrestrial Vegetation of California (1977), John Wiley and Sons, New York 559-599
49. Salazar L.A., and González-Cabán A. Spatial relationships of a wildfire, fuelbreaks, and recently burned areas. West. J. Appl. For. 2 (1987) 55-58
50. Scott J.H. NEXUS: a system for assessing crown fire hazard. Fire Manage. Notes 59 (1999) 20-24
51. Scott, J.H., Burgan, R.E., 2005. Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel's surface fire spread model. General Technical Report RMRS-153. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
52. Scott, J.H., Reinhardt, E.D., 2001. Assessing crown fire potential by linking models of surface and crown fire behavior. Research Paper RMRS-29. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
53. Scott J.H., and Reinhardt E.D. Estimating canopy fuels in conifer forests. Fire Manage. Today 62 (2002) 45-50
54. Sessions, J., Johnson, K.N., Sapsis, D.B, Bahro, B., Gabriel, J.T., 1996. Methodology for simulating forest growth, fire effects, timber harvest, and watershed disturbance under different management regimes. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final report to Congress, vol. II. Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options. Wildland Resources Center Report No. 37. Center for Water, Wildland Resources, University of California Davis, CA, pp. 115-174.
55. Skinner, C.N., 2005. Reintroducing fire into the Blacks Mountain Research Natural Area: effects on fire hazard. In: Ritchie, M.W., Maguire, D.A., Youngblood, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Ponderosa Pine: Issues, Trends, and Management, 2004. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-198. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, pp. 245-57.
56. Skinner, C.N., Chang, C., 1996. Fire regimes, past and present. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final report to Congress, vol. II. Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options. Wildland Resources Center Report No. 37, Center for Water, Wildland Resources, University of California Davis, CA, pp. 1041-1069.
57. Skinner, C.N., Boerner, R., Fettig, C., Otrosina, W., Zack, S., 2001. Study plan for the Southern Cascades site of the National Study of the Consequences of Fire and Fire Surrogate Treatments. http://www.fs.fed.us/ffs/docs/studyplans2001/scascades-study-plan2001.pd f (last accessed 24 April 2004).
58. Skinner C.N., Ritchie M.W., Hamilton T., and Symons J. Effects of prescribed fire and thinning on wildfire severity: the Cone Fire, Blacks Mountain Experimental Forest. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Forest Vegetation Management Conference. Redding, CA, 20-24 January (2004) 80-91
59. Stephens S.L. Evaluation of the effects of silvicultural and fuels treatments on potential fire behavior in Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 10 (1998) 21-35
60. Stephens S.L., and Moghaddas J.J. Experimental fuel treatment impacts on forest structure, potential fire behavior, and predicted tree mortality in a mixed conifer forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 215 (2005) 21-36
61. Stephens S.L., and Ruth L.W. Federal forest fire policy in the United States. Ecol. Appl. 15 (2005) 532-542
62. Stephens S.L., and Sugihara N.G. Fire management and policy since European settlement. In: Sugihara N.G., van Wagtendonk J., Shaffer K.E., Fites-Kaufman J., and Thode A.E. (Eds). Fire in California's Ecosystems (2006), University of California Press, Berkeley 431-443
63. Stratton R.D. Assessing the effectiveness of landscape fuel treatments on fire growth and behavior. J. For. 102 (2004) 32-40
64. Strom, B.A., Fulé, P.Z., 2007. Pre-wildfire fuel treatments affect long-term ponderosa pine forest dynamics. Int. J. Wildland Fire 16, 128-138.
65. U.S. General Accounting Office, 1999. Western national forests-a cohesive strategy is needed to address catastrophic wildfire threats. U.S. General Accounting Office GAO/RCED-99-65, Washington, D.C.
66. USDA-USDI, 1994. Record of decision for amendments to Forest Service and Nureau of Land Management planning documents within the range of the northern spotted owl: standards and guidelines for management of late successional and old-growth forest related species with the range of the northern spotted owl. USDA Forest Service and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Portland, OR.
67. van Wagtendonk, J.W., 1995. Large fires in wilderness areas. In: Brown, J.K., Mutch, R.W., Spoon, C.W., Wakimoto, R.H. (Eds.) (Technical Coordinators), Proceedings of the Symposium on Fire in Wilderness and Park Management. General Technical Rpt. INT-GTR-320. USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, pp. 113-116.
68. van Wagtendonk, J.W., 1996. Use of a deterministic fire growth model to test fuel treatments. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final report to Congress, vol. II. Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options. Wildland Resources Center Report No. 37, Center for Water, Wildland Resources, University of California, Davis, CA, pp. 1155-1165.
69. van Wagtendonk J.W., Benedict J.M., and Sydoriak W.M. Fuel bed characteristics of Sierra Nevada conifers. West. J. Appl. For. 13 (1998) 73-84
70. Weatherspoon, C.P., 1996. Fire-silviculture relationships in Sierra forests. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final report to Congress, vol. II. Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options. Wildland Resources Center Report No. 37. Center for Water, Wildland Resources, University of California, Davis, CA, pp. 1471-1492.
71. Weatherspoon, C.P., McIver, J., 2000. A national study of the consequences of fire and fire surrogate treatments-amended March 2000. http://www.fs.fed.us/ffs/docs/FFSfinalProposal--17april2000.doc (last accessed 15 July 2005).
72. Weatherspoon, C.P., Skinner, C.N., 1996. Landscape-level strategies for forest fuel management. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project, Final Report to Congress, vol. II. Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options. Wildland Resources Center Report No. 37. Center for Water, Wildland Resources, University of California, Davis, CA, pp. 1471-1492.
73. Whittaker R.H. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. 30 (1960) 279-338