A Brunswik lens model of consumer health judgments of packaged foods

Journal of Consumer Behaviour

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 270-281

  Orquin, Jacob L ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84905004994     PISSN: 14720817     EISSN: 14791838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cb.1465     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Andrews JC, Netemeyer RG, Burton S. 2009. The nutrition elite: do only the highest levels of caloric knowledge, obesity knowledge, and motivation matter in processing nutrition ad claims and disclosures? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 28(1): 41-55.
2. Ares G, Mawad F, Giménez A, Maiche A. 2014. Influence of rational and intuitive thinking styles on food choice: preliminary evidence from an eye-tracking study with yogurt labels. Food Quality and Preference 31: 28-37.
3. Bauer PJ, Annunziato Dow G, Hertsgaard LA. 1995. Effects of prototypicality on categorization in 1- to 2-year-olds: getting down to basic. Cognitive Development 10: 42-68.
4. Bialkova S, van Trijp HCM. 2011. An efficient methodology for assessing attention to and effect of nutrition information displayed front-of-pack. Food Quality and Preference 22(6): 592-601.
5. Brunswik E. 1952. The Conceptual Framework of Psychology. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
6. Carels RA, Konrad K, Harper J. 2007. Individual differences in food perceptions and calorie estimation: an examination of dieting status, weight, and gender. Appetite 49(2): 450-458.
7. Chernev A, Gal D. 2010. Categorization effects in value judgments: averaging bias in evaluating combinations of vices and virtues. Journal of Marketing Research 47(4): 738-747.
8. Chrysochou P, Askegaard S, Grunert KG, Kristensen DB. 2010. Social discourses of healthy eating: a market segmentation approach. Appetite 55(2): 288-297.
9. Cowburn G, Stockley L. 2005. Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutrition 8(01): 21-28.
10. Feunekes GIJ, Gortemaker IA, Willems AA, Lion R, van den Kommer M. 2008. Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four european countries. Appetite 50(1): 57-70.
11. Förster J, Denzler M. 2011. When any worx looks typical to you: global relative to local processing increases prototypicality and liking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48(1): 416-419.
12. Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W. 2011. Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 62(1): 451-482.
13. Graham DJ, Orquin JL, Visschers VHM. 2012. Eye tracking and nutrition label use: a review of the literature and recommendations for label enhancement. Food Policy 37(4): 378-382.
14. Halberstadt J. 2006. The generality and ultimate origins of the attractiveness of prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10(2): 166-183.
15. Higginson C, Kirk T, Rayner M, Draper S. 2002a. How do consumers use nutrition label information? Nutrition & Food Science 32(4): 145-152.
16. Higginson C, Rayner M, Draper S, Kirk T. 2002b. The nutrition label-which information is looked at? Nutrition & Food Science 32(3): 92-99.
17. Hoffman PJ, Slovic P, Rorer LG. 1968. An analysis-of-variance model for the assessment of configural cue utilization in clinical judgment. Psychological Bulletin 69(5): 338-349.
18. Hogarth RM, Karelaia N. 2007. Heuristic and linear models of judgment: matching rules and environments. Psychological Review 114(3): 733-758.
19. Irmak C, Vallen B, Robinson SR. 2011. The impact of product name on dieters' and nondieters' food evaluations and consumption. Journal of Consumer Research 38(2): 390-405.
20. Johnson EJ, Payne JW. 1985. Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Science 31(4): 395-414.
21. Karelaia N, Hogarth RM. 2008. Determinants of linear judgment: a meta-analysis of lens model studies. Psychological Bulletin 134(3): 404-426.
22. Kunst-Wilson WR, Zajonc RB. 1980. Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science 207(4430): 557-558.
23. Landis JR, Koch GG. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1): 159-174.
24. Loken B. 2006. Consumer psychology: categorization, inferences, affect, and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology 57: 453-485.
25. Loken B, Ward J. 1990. Alternative approaches to understanding the determinants of typicality. The Journal of Consumer Research 17(2): 111-126.
26. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, & YouGov Zapera. 2010. Kendskab til nøglehulsmærket og kampagnen "nemt at vælge sundere".
27. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, & Zapera.com. 2009. Nøglehulsmærket 2008.
28. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries. 2013. Bekendtgørelse om anvendelse af Nøglehulsmærket. Lovtidende A. (913) 1-15.
29. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries. 2013. Lov om Fødevarer. Lovtidende A. (250) 1-10.
30. Moreland RL, Zajonc RB. 1977. Is stimulus recognition a necessary condition for the occurrence of exposure effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35(4): 191-199.
31. Mueller Loose S, Scholderer J, Corsi AM, Lockshin L. 2012. The impact of choice context on consumers' choice heuristics. Paper presented at EMAC 2012.
32. Oakes ME. 2004. Good foods gone bad: infamous' nutrients diminish perceived vitamin and mineral content of foods. Appetite 42(3): 273-278.
33. Oakes ME, Slotterback CS. 2001a. Gender differences in perceptions of the healthiness of foods. Psychology & Health 16(1): 57-65.
34. Oakes ME, Slotterback C. 2001b. Judgements of food healthfulness: food name stereotypes in adults over age 25. Appetite 37(1): 1-8.
35. Orquin JL, Mueller Loose S. 2013. Attention and choice: a review on eye movements in decision making. Acta Psychologica 144(1): 190-206.
36. Orquin JL, Scholderer J. 2011a. Attention to health cues on product packages. Journal of Eye Tracking, Visual Cognition and Emotion 1(1): 59-63.
37. Orquin JL, Scholderer J. 2011b. Persuasive health branding of foods: are we misled? Paper presented at Persuasive 2010.
38. Orquin JL, Scholderer J, Jeppesen HB. 2012. What you see is what you buy: how saliency and surface size of packaging elements affect attention and choice. Paper presented at SABE 2012.
39. Orquin JL, Bagger MP, Mueller Loose S. 2013. Learning affects top down and bottom up modulation of eye movements during decision making. Judgment and Decision Making 8(6): 716-716.
40. Orth UR, Malkewitz K. 2008. Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions. Journal of Marketing 72(3): 64-81.
41. Orth UR, Campana D, Malkewitz K. 2010. Formation of consumer price expectation based on package design: attractive and quality routes. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 18(1): 23-40.
42. Peugh JL. 2010. A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology 48(1): 85-112.
43. Rayner M, Scarborough P, Boxer A, Stockley L. 2005. Nutrient Profiles: Development of Final Model. Food Standards Agency: London.
44. Regulation (EC) no 1924/2006 of 20 December 2006 on Nutrition and Health Claims made on Foods, 2006.
45. Reimann M, Zaichkowsky J, Neuhaus C, Bender T, Weber B. 2010. Aesthetic package design: a behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology 20(4): 431-441.
46. Roininen K, Lähteenmäki L, Tuorila H. 1999. Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite 33(1): 71-88.
47. Rosch E, Mervis CB. 1975. Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7(4): 573-605.
48. Rozin P, Ashmore M, Markwith M. 1996. Lay american conceptions of nutrition: dose insensitivity, categorical thinking, contagion, and the monotonic mind. Health Psychology 15(6): 438-447.
49. Rozin P, Fischler C, Imada S, Sarubin A, Wrzesniewski A. 1999. Attitudes to food and the role of food in the life of U.S.A., Japan, Flemish Belgium and France: possible implications for the diet-health debate. Appetite 33(2): 163-180.
50. Scarborough P, Boxer A, Rayner M, Stockley L. 2007. Testing nutrient profile models using data from a survey of nutrition professionals. Public Health Nutrition 10(04): 337-345.
51. Scarborough P, Arambepola C, Kaur A, Bhatnagar P, Rayner M. 2010. Should nutrient profile models be 'category specific' or 'across-the-board' & quest; a comparison of the two systems using diets of British adults. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 64(6): 553-560.
52. Scheibehenne B, Miesler L, Todd PM. 2007. Fast and frugal food choices: uncovering individual decision heuristics. Appetite 49(3): 578-589.
53. Schulte-Mecklenbeck M, Sohn M, de Bellis E, Martin N, Hertwig R. 2013. A lack of appetite for information and computation. Simple heuristics in food choice. Appetite 71: 242-251.
54. Schultz JJ, Jr., Gustavson SG. 1978. Actuaries' perceptions of variables affecting the independent auditor's legal liability. The Accounting Review 53(3): 626-641.
55. Twisk JWR. 2006. Applied Multilevel Modeling: A Practical Guide. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
56. Vidal L, Atúnez L, Sapolinski A, Giménez A, Maiche A, Ares G. 2013. Can eye-tracking techniques overcome a limitation of conjoint analysis? Case study on healthfulness perception of yogurt labels. Journal of Sensory Studies 28: 370-380.
57. Visschers VHM, Hess R, Siegrist M. 2010. Health motivation and product design determine consumers' visual attention to nutrition information on food products. Public Health Nutrition 13(07): 1099-1106.
58. Zajonc RB. 1968. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9(2): 1-27.