The effect of parametric stimulus size variation on individual face discrimination indexed by fast periodic visual stimulation

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 15, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Dzhelyova, Milena ^a   Rossion, Bruno ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

EEG; Face perception; Individual face discrimination; Size invariance; SSVEP

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EYE MOVEMENT; FACE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904767636     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-15-87     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Rolls ET, Baylis GC. Size and contrast have only small effects on the responses to faces of neurons in the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey. Exp Brain Res 1986, 65(1):38-48.
2. Ito M, Tamura H, Fujita I, Tanaka K. Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. J Neurophysiol 1995, 73(1):218-226.
3. Schwartz EL, Desimone R, Albright TD, Gross CG. Shape recognition and inferior temporal neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1983, 80(18):5776-5778.
4. Lueschow A, Miller EK, Desimone R. Inferior temporal mechanisms for invariant object recognition. Cereb Cortex 1994, 4(5):523-531.
5. Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Edelman S, Avidan G, Itzchak Y, Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24(1):187-203.
6. Andrews TJ, Ewbank MP. Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. NeuroImage 2004, 23(3):905-913.
7. Cziraki C, Greenlee MW, Kovács G. Neural correlates of high-level adaptation-related aftereffects. J Neurophysiol 2010, 103(3):1410-1417.
8. Lee Y, Grady CL, Habak C, Wilson HR, Moscovitch M. Face processing changes in normal aging revealed by fMRI adaptation. J Cogn Neurosci 2011, 23(11):3433-3447.
9. Ewbank MP, Henson RN, Rowe JB, Stoyanova RS, Calder AJ. Different neural mechanisms within occipitotemporal cortex underlie repetition suppression across same and different-size faces. Cereb Cortex 2013, 23(5):1073-1084.
10. Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 1996, 8(6):551-565.
11. Rossion B, Jacques C. The N170: understanding the time-course of face perception in the human brain. The Oxford Handbook of ERP Components 2011, 115-141. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Luck S, Kappenman E.
12. Schweinberger SR, Pickering EC, Jentzsch I, Burton AM, Kaufmann JM. Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Cogn Brain Res 2002, 14(3):398-409.
13. Jacques C, d'Arripe O, Rossion B. The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination. J Vis 2007, 7(8):3. 1-9.
14. Walther C, Schweinberger SR, Kaiser D, Kovács G. Neural correlates of priming and adaptation in familiar face perception. Cortex 2013, 49(7):1963-1977.
15. Regan D. Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1966, 20(3):238-248.
16. Regan D. Human brain electrophysiology: evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine 1989, New York: Elsevier.
17. Rossion B, Boremanse A. Robust sensitivity to facial identity in the right human occipito-temporal cortex as revealed by steady-state visual-evoked potentials. J Vis 2011, 11(2):16. 1-21.
18. Rossion B, Alonso-Prieto E, Boremanse A, Kuefner D, Van Belle G. A steady-state visualevoked potential approach to individual face perception: Effect of inversion, contrast-reversal and temporal dynamics. NeuroImage 2012, 63(3):1585-1600.
19. Alonso-Prieto E, Van Belle G, Liu-Shuang J, Norcia AM, Rossion B. The 6 Hz fundamental stimulation frequency rate for individual face discrimination in the right occipito-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51(13):2863-2875.
20. Rossion B. Understanding individual face discrimination by means of fast periodic visual stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2014, 232(6):1599-1621.
21. Liu-Shuang J, Norcia AM, Rossion B. An objective index of individual face discrimination in the right occipito-temporal cortex by means of fast periodic oddball stimulation. Neuropsychologia 2014, 52:57-72.
22. Rossion B. Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychol 2008, 128(2):274-289.
23. Russell R, Sinha P, Biederman I, Nederhouser M. Is pigmentation important for face recognition? Evidence from contrast negation. Perception 2006, 35(6):749-759.
24. Moratti S, Keil A, Stolarova M. Motivated attention in emotional picture processing is reflected by activity modulation in cortical attention networks. NeuroImage 2004, 21(3):954-964.
25. Keil A, Moratti S, Sabatinelli D, Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Additive effects of emotional content and spatial selective attention on electrocortical facilitation. Cereb Cortex 2005, 15(8):1187-1197.
26. Kaspar K, Hassler U, Martens U, Trujillo-Barreto N, Gruber T. Steady-state visually evoked potential correlates of object recognition. Brain Res 2010, 1343:112-121.
27. Kimura M, Schröger E, Czigler I. Visual mismatch negativity and its importance in visual cognitive sciences. NeuroReport 2011, 22(14):669-673. 610.1097/WNR.1090b1013e32834973ba.
28. Czigler I, Balázs L, Winkler I. Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. Psychophysiology 2002, 39(6):869-873.
29. Garrido MI, Kilner JM, Stephan KE, Friston KJ. The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120(3):453-463.
30. Grill-Spector K, Malach R. fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychol 2001, 107(1-3):293-321.
31. Näätänen R, Gaillard AWK, Mäntysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol 1978, 42(4):313-329.
32. Pazo-Alvarez P, Cadaveira F, Amenedo E. MMN in the visual modality: a review. Biol Psychol 2003, 63(3):199-236.
33. Kimura M, Widmann A, Schröger E. Top-down attention affects sequential regularity representation in the human visual system. Int J Psychophysiol 2010, 77(2):126-134.
34. Eddy MD, Holcomb PJ. Electrophysiological evidence for size invariance in masked picture repetition priming. Brain Cogn 2009, 71(3):397-409.
35. Gentile F, Rossion B. Temporal frequency tuning of cortical face-sensitive areas for individual face perception. NeuroImage 2014, 90:256-265.
36. Kovács G, Cziraki C, Vidnyánszky Z, Schweinberger SR, Greenlee MW. Position-specific and position-invariant face aftereffects reflect the adaptation of different cortical areas. NeuroImage 2008, 43(1):156-164.
37. Mouraux A, Iannetti GD. Across-trial averaging of event-related EEG responses and beyond. Magn Reson Imaging 2008, 26(7):1041-1054.
38. Nozaradan S, Peretz I, Missal M, Mouraux A. Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat and meter. J Neurosci 2011, 31(28):10234-10240.
39. Hu L, Xiao P, Zhang ZG, Mouraux A, Iannetti GD. Single-trial time-frequency analysis of electrocortical signals: baseline correction and beyond. NeuroImage 2014, 84:876-887.