Different neural mechanisms within occipitotemporal cortex underlie repetition suppression across same and different-size faces

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1073-1084

  Ewbank, Michael P ^a   Henson, Richard N ^a   Rowe, James B ^a,b,c   Stoyanova, Raliza S ^a   Calder, Andrew J ^a  

^a MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

adaptation; DCM; face processing; fMRI; predictive coding

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; FACE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; FUSIFORM FACE AREA; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; OCCIPITOTEMPORAL CORTEX; OXYGEN BLOOD LEVEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL CORTEX;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NERVE NET; NEURAL INHIBITION; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TEMPORAL LOBE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84876165119     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs070     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Andrews TJ, Davies-Thompson J, Kingstone A, Young AW. 2010. Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex. J Neurosci. 30:3544-3552.
2. Andrews TJ, Ewbank MP. 2004. Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. Neuroimage. 23:905-913.
3. Bellgowan PS, Bandettini PA, van Gelderen P, Martin A, Bodurka J. 2006. Improved BOLD detection in the medial temporal region using parallel imaging and voxel volume reduction. Neuroimage. 29:1244-1251.
4. Brett M, Anton J, Valabregue R, Poline JB. 2002. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox. Neuroimage. 16:2.
5. Calder AJ. 2011. Does facial identity and facial expression recognition involve separate visual routes?. In: Calder AJ, Rhodes G, Haxby JV, Johnson MH, editors. The handbook of face perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Calder AJ, Beaver JD, Winston JS, Dolan RJ, Jenkins R, Eger E, Henson RNA. 2007. Separate coding of different gaze directions in the superior temporal sulcus and inferior parietal lobule. Curr Biol. 17:20-25.
7. Calder AJ, Young AW. 2005. Understanding facial identity and facial expression recognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 6:641-651.
8. Carlin JD, Calder AJ, Kriegeskorte N, Nili H, Rowe JB. 2011. A head view-invariant representation of gaze direction in anterior superior temporal sulcus. Curr Biol. 21:1817-1821.
9. Carlin JD, Rowe JB, Kriegeskorte N, Thompson R, Calder AJ. 2011. Direction-sensitive codes for observed head turns in human superior temporal sulcus. Cereb Cortex. 22:735-744.
10. Cohen Kadosh K, Cohen Kadosh R, Dick F, Johnson MH. 2011. Developmental changes in effective connectivity in the emerging core face network. Cereb Cortex. 21:1389-1394.
11. Cziraki C, Greenlee MW, Kovacs G. 2010. Neural correlates of high-level adaptation-related aftereffects. J Neurophysiol. 103:1410-1417.
12. Dricot L, Sorger B, Schiltz C, Goebel R, Rossion B. 2008. The roles of "face" and "non-face" areas during individual face perception: evidence by fMRI adaptation in a brain-damaged prosopagnosic patient. Neuroimage. 40:318-332.
13. Ewbank MP, Andrews TJ. 2008. Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex. Neuroimage. 40:1857-1870.
14. Ewbank MP, Lawson RP, Henson RN, Rowe JB, Passamonti L, Calder AJ. 2011. Changes in "top-down" connectivity underlie repetition suppression in the ventral visual pathway. J Neurosci. 31: 5635-5642.
15. Fairhall SL, Ishai A. 2007. Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. Cereb Cortex. 17:2400-2406.
16. Fang F, Murray SO, He S. 2007. Duration-dependent fMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representations in human visual cortex. Cereb Cortex. 17:1402-1411.
17. Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC. 1991. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 1:1-47.
18. Friston K. 2005. A theory of cortical responses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 360:815-836.
19. Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W. 2003. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage. 19:1273-1302.
20. Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A. 2006. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci. 10:14-23.
21. Grill-Spector K, Malach R. 2001. fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychol. 107:293-321.
22. Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI. 2000. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 4:223-233.
23. Henson R, Shallice T, Dolan R. 2000. Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science. 287:1269-1272.
24. Henson RN. 2003. Neuroimaging studies of priming. Prog Neurobiol. 70:53-81.
25. Henson RN, Goshen-Gottstein Y, Ganel T, Otten LJ, Quayle A, Rugg MD. 2003. Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. Cereb Cortex. 13:793-805.
26. Kaliukhovich DA, Vogels R. 2011. Stimulus repetition probability does not affect repetition suppression in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 21:1547-1558.
27. Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM. 1997. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci. 17:4302-4311.
28. Kim M, Ducros M, Carlson T, Ronen I, He S, Ugurbil K, Kim DS. 2006. Anatomical correlates of the functional organization in the human occipitotemporal cortex. Magn Reson Imaging. 24:583-590.
29. Kovacs G, Cziraki C, Vidnyanszky Z, Schweinberger SR, Greenlee MW. 2008. Position-specific and position-invariant face aftereffects reflect the adaptation of different cortical areas. Neuroimage. 43:156-164.
30. Kriegeskorte N, Formisano E, Sorger B, Goebel R. 2007. Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:20600-20605.
31. Lee Y, Grady CL, Habak C, Wilson HR, Moscovitch M. 2011. Face processing changes in normal aging revealed by fMRI adaptation. J Cogn Neurosci. 23:3433-3447.
32. Li J, Liu J, Liang J, Zhang H, Zhao J, Rieth CA, Huber DE, Li W, Shi G, Ai L, et al. 2010. Effective connectivities of cortical regions for top-down face processing: a dynamic causal modeling study. Brain Res. 1340:40-51.
33. Loffler G, Yourganov G, Wilkinson F, Wilson HR. 2005. fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nat Neurosci. 8:1386-1391.
34. Lundqvist D, Litton J-E. 1998. The averaged Karolinska directed emotional faces-AKDEF. AKDEF CD ROM. Stockholm (Sweden): Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet.
35. Mazard A, Schiltz C, Rossion B. 2006. Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia. 44:912-922.
36. Naccache L, Dehaene S. 2001. The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. Cereb Cortex. 11:966-974.
37. Peelen MV, Downing PE. 2007. The neural basis of visual body perception. Nat Rev Neurosci. 8:636-648.
38. Penny WD, Stephan KE, Daunizeau J, Rosa MJ, Friston KJ, Schofield TM, Leff AP. 2010. Comparing families of dynamic causal models. PLoS Comput Biol. 6:e1000709.
39. Phillips PJ, Moon H, Rizvim SA, Rauss PJ. 2000. The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 22:1090-1104.
40. Pourtois G, Schwartz S, Seghier ML, Lazeyras F, Vuilleumier P. 2005. Portraits or people? Distinct representations of face identity in the human visual cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 17:1043-1057.
41. Rajimehr R, Young JC, Tootell RB. 2009. An anterior temporal face patch in human cortex, predicted by macaque maps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:1995-2000.
42. Rhodes G. 1985. Lateralized processes in face recognition. Br J Psychol. 76:249-271.
43. Rossion B. 2008. Constraining the cortical face network by neuro-imaging studies of acquired prosopagnosia. Neuroimage. 40:423-426.
44. Rossion B, Caldara R, Seghier M, Schuller AM, Lazeyras F, Mayer E. 2003. A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. Brain. 126:2381-2395.
45. Rossion B, Dricot L, Devolder A, Bodart JM, Crommelinck M, De Gelder B, Zoontjes R. 2000. Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus. J Cogn Neurosci. 12:793-802.
46. Rotshtein P, Henson RNA, Treves A, Driver J, Dolan RJ. 2005. Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nat Neurosci. 8:107-113.
47. Schiltz C, Sorger B, Caldara R, Ahmed F, Mayer E, Goebel R, Rossion B. 2006. Impaired face discrimination in acquired prosopagnosia is associated with abnormal response to individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus. Cereb Cortex. 16:574-586.
48. Steeves J, Dricot L, Goltz HC, Sorger B, Peters J, Milner AD, Goodale MA, Goebel R, Rossion B. 2009. Abnormal face identity coding in the middle fusiform gyrus of two brain-damaged prosopagnosic patients. Neuropsychologia. 47:2584-2592.
49. Steeves JK, Culham JC, Duchaine BC, Pratesi CC, Valyear KF, Schindler I, Humphrey GK, Milner AD, Goodale MA. 2006. The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area. Neuropsychologia. 44:594-609.
50. Stephan KE, Penny WD, Daunizeau J, Moran RJ, Friston KJ. 2009. Bayesian model selection for group studies. Neuroimage. 46:1004-1017.
51. Stephan KE, Penny WD, Moran RJ, den Ouden HE, Daunizeau J, Friston KJ. 2010. Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage. 49:3099-3109.
52. Summerfield C, Trittschuh EH, Monti JM, Mesulam MM, Egner T. 2008. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nat Neurosci. 11:1004-1006.
53. Summerfield C, Wyart V, Johnen VM, de Gardelle V. 2011. Human scalp electroencephalography reveals that repetition suppression varies with expectation. Front Hum Neurosci. 5:67.
54. Tottenham N, Tanaka J, Leon AC, McCarry T, Nurse M, Hare TA, Marcus DJ, Westerlund A, Casey BJ, Nelson CA. 2009. The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Res. 168:242-249.
55. Tsao DY, Moeller S, Freiwald WA. 2008. Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:19514-19519.
56. Winston JS, Henson RNA, Fine-Goulden MR, Dolan RJ. 2004. fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. J Neurophysiol. 92: 1830-1839.