Temporal frequency tuning of cortical face-sensitive areas for individual face perception

NeuroImage

Volumn 90, Issue , 2014, Pages 256-265

  Gentile, Francesco ^a,b,c   Rossion, Bruno ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b Institute of Neuroscience (IoNS)   (Belgium)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

FFA; FMRI adaptation; Individual face perception; OFA; Temporal frequencies

Indexed keywords

FFA; FMRI ADAPTATION; INDIVIDUAL FACE PERCEPTION; OFA; TEMPORAL FREQUENCIES;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84893631964     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.053     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alonso-Prieto E., Belle G.V., Liu-Shuang J., Norcia A.M., Rossion B. The 6Hz fundamental stimulation frequency rate for individual face discrimination in the right occipito-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:2863-2875.
2. Andrews T.J., Ewbank M.P. Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. NeuroImage 2004, 23:905-913.
3. Andrews T.J., Clarke A., Pell P., Hartley T. Selectivity for low-level features of objects in the human ventral stream. NeuroImage 2010, 49:703-711.
4. Bartlett A.M., Ovaysikia S., Logothetis N.K., Hoffman K.L. Saccades during object viewing modulate oscillatory phase in the superior temporal sulcus. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:18423-18432.
5. Daelli V., van Rijsbergen N.J., Treves A. How recent experience affects the perception of ambiguous objects. Brain Res. 2010, 1322:81-91.
6. Davies-Thompson J., Gouws A., Andrews T.J. An image-dependent representation of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human ventral stream. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1627-1635.
7. D'Souza D.V., Auer T., Strasburger H., Frahm J., Lee B.B. Temporal frequency and chromatic processing in humans: an fMRI study of the cortical visual areas. J. Vis. 2011, 11.
8. Eger E., Schyns P.G., Kleinschmidt A. Scale invariant adaptation in fusiform face-responsive regions. NeuroImage 2004, 22:232-242.
9. Ewbank M.P., Andrews T.J. Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex. NeuroImage 2008, 40:1857-1870.
10. Fox P.T., Raichle M.E. Stimulus rate dependence of regional cerebral blood flow in human striate cortex, demonstrated by positron emission tomography. J. Neurophysiol. 1984, 51:1109-1120.
11. Fox P.T., Raichle M.E. Stimulus rate determines regional brain blood flow in striate cortex. Ann. Neurol. 1985, 17:303-305.
12. Furl N., Garrido L., Dolan R.J., Driver J., Duchaine B. Fusiform gyrus face selectivity relates to individual differences in facial recognition ability. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:1723-1740.
13. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Moylan J., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., Anderson A.W. The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000, 12:495-504.
14. Gauthier B., Eger E., Hesselmann G., Giraud A.L., Kleinschmidt A. Temporal tuning properties along the human ventral visual stream. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:14433-14441.
15. Genovese C.R., Lazar N.A., Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. NeuroImage 2002, 15:870-878.
16. Grill-Spector K., Malach R. fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 2001, 107:293-321.
17. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 1999, 24:187-203.
18. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., Martin A. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10:14-23.
19. Haxby J.V., Hoffman E.A., Gobbini M.I. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:223-233.
20. Heisz J.J., Watter S., Shedden J.M. Automatic face identity encoding at the N170. Vis. Res. 2006, 46:4604-4614.
21. Holcombe A.O. Seeing slow and seeing fast: two limits on perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2009, 13:216-221.
22. Ishai A. Let's face it: it's a cortical network. NeuroImage 2008, 40:415-419.
23. Jacques C., Rossion B. The speed of individual face categorization. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 17:485-492.
24. Jacques C., d'Arripe O., Rossion B. The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination. J. Vis. 2007, 7:3.
25. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 1997, 17:4302-4311.
26. Keysers C., Perrett D.I. Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2002, 6:120-125.
27. Keysers C., Xiao D.K., Foldiak P., Perrett D.I. The speed of sight. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2001, 13:90-101.
28. Kovacs G., Vogels R., Orban G.A. Cortical correlate of pattern backward masking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995, 92:5587-5591.
29. Laguesse R., Dormal G., Biervoye A., Kuefner D., Rossion B. Extensive visual training in adulthood significantly reduces the face inversion effect. J. Vis. 2012, 12:14.
30. Liu J., Wandell B.A. Specializations for chromatic and temporal signals in human visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:3459-3468.
31. Matsumoto N., Okada M., Sugase-Miyamoto Y., Yamane S., Kawano K. Population dynamics of face-responsive neurons in the inferior temporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:1103-1112.
32. Mazard A., Schiltz C., Rossion B. Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:912-922.
33. McKeeff T.J., Remus D.A., Tong F. Temporal limitations in object processing across the human ventral visual pathway. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 98:382-393.
34. Mukamel R., Harel M., Hendler T., Malach R. Enhanced temporal non-linearities in human object-related occipito-temporal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14:575-585.
35. Mullen K.T., Thompson B., Hess R.F. Responses of the human visual cortex and LGN to achromatic and chromatic temporal modulations: an fMRI study. J. Vis. 2010, 10:13.
36. Muthukumaraswamy S.D., Singh K.D. Spatiotemporal frequency tuning of BOLD and gamma band MEG responses compared in primary visual cortex. NeuroImage 2008, 40:1552-1560.
37. Nasanen R. Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images. Vis. Res. 1999, 39:3824-3833.
38. Ozus B., Liu H.L., Chen L., Iyer M.B., Fox P.T., Gao J.H. Rate dependence of human visual cortical response due to brief stimulation: an event-related fMRI study. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001, 19:21-25.
39. Pastor M.A., Artieda J., Arbizu J., Valencia M., Masdeu J.C. Human cerebral activation during steady-state visual-evoked responses. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23:11621-11627.
40. Pitcher D., Dilks D.D., Saxe R.R., Triantafyllou C., Kanwisher N. Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions. NeuroImage 2011, 56:2356-2363.
41. Puce A., Allison T., Gore J.C., McCarthy G. Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. J. Neurophysiol. 1995, 74:1192-1199.
42. Purpura K.P., Kalik S.F., Schiff N.D. Analysis of perisaccadic field potentials in the occipitotemporal pathway during active vision. J. Neurophysiol. 2003, 90:3455-3478.
43. Rajkai C., Lakatos P., Chen C.M., Pincze Z., Karmos G., Schroeder C.E. Transient cortical excitation at the onset of visual fixation. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:200-209.
44. Regan D. Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1966, 20:238-248.
45. Rolls E.T., Tovee M.J. Sparseness of the neuronal representation of stimuli in the primate temporal visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1995, 73:713-726.
46. Rossion B. Constraining the cortical face network by neuroimaging studies of acquired prosopagnosia. NeuroImage 2008, 40:423-426.
47. Rossion B., Boremanse A. Robust sensitivity to facial identity in the right human occipito-temporal cortex as revealed by steady-state visual-evoked potentials. J. Vis. 2011, 11.
48. Rossion B., Hanseeuw B., Dricot L. Defining face perception areas in the human brain: a large-scale factorial fMRI face localizer analysis. Brain Cogn. 2012, 79:138-157.
49. Schiltz C., Rossion B. Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex. NeuroImage 2006, 32:1385-1394.
50. Schultz J., Pilz K.S. Natural facial motion enhances cortical responses to faces. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 194:465-475.
51. Sergent J., Ohta S., MacDonald B. Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. Brain 1992, 115(Pt 1):15-36.
52. Singh K.D., Smith A.T., Greenlee M.W. Spatiotemporal frequency and direction sensitivities of human visual areas measured using fMRI. NeuroImage 2000, 12:550-564.
53. Sugase Y., Yamane S., Ueno S., Kawano K. Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex. Nature 1999, 400:869-873.
54. Uematsu M., Matsuzaki N., Brown E.C., Kojima K., Asano E. Human occipital cortices differentially exert saccadic suppression: Intracranial recording in children. NeuroImage 2013, 83:224-236.
55. Weiner K.S., Grill-Spector K. Sparsely-distributed organization of face and limb activations in human ventral temporal cortex. NeuroImage 2010, 52:1559-1573.
56. Winston J.S., Henson R.N., Fine-Goulden M.R., Dolan R.J. fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. J. Neurophysiol. 2004, 92:1830-1839.
57. Yovel G., Kanwisher N. The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:2256-2262.