Robust sensitivity to facial identity in the right human occipito-temporal cortex as revealed by steady-state visual-evoked potentials

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 1-21

  Rossion, Bruno ^a   Boremanse, Adriano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

EEG; Face perception; Identity adaptation; N170; SSVEP

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FACE; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMAN; MALE; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; TEMPORAL LOBE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FACE; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMANS; MALE; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; TEMPORAL LOBE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957990967     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.2.1     Document Type: Article

References (121)

1. Ales, J. M., & Norcia, A. M. (2009). Assessing directionspecific adaptation using the steady-state visual evoked potential: Results from EEG source imaging. Journal of Vision, 9(7):8, 1-13, http://www.journalofvision.org/ content/9/7/8, doi:10.1167/9.7.8.
2. Andersen, S. K., Mü ller, M. M., & Hillyard, S. A. (2009). Color-selective attention need not be mediated by spatial attention. Journal of Vision, 9(6):2, 1-7, http:// www.journalofvision.org/content/9/6/2, doi:10.1167/ 9.6.2.
3. Andrews, T. J., & Ewbank, M. P. (2004). Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. Neuroimage, 23, 905-913.
4. Appelbaum, L. G., Wade, A. R., Pettet, M. W., Vildavski, V. Y., & Norcia, A. M. (2008). Figure-ground interaction in the human visual cortex. Journal of Vision, 8(9):8, 1-19, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/9/8, doi:10.1167/8.9.8.
5. Appelbaum, L. G., Wade, A. R., Vildavski, V. Y., Pettet, M. W., & Norcia, A. M. (2006). Cue-invariant networks for figure and background processing in human visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 11695-11708.
6. Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, P. O., & Wittlinger, R. P. (1975). Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A crosssectional approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 54-75.
7. Baylis, G. C., & Rolls, E. T. (1987). Responses of neurons in the inferior temporal cortex in short term and serial recognition memory tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 65, 614-622.
8. Bentin, S., McCarthy, G., Perez, E., Puce, A., & Allison, T. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551-565.
9. Biederman, I., & Kalocsai, P. (1997). Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 352, 1203-1219.
10. Bouvier, S. E., & Engel, S. A. (2006). Behavioral deficits and cortical damage loci in cerebral achromatopsia. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 183-191.
11. Braddick, O. J., Wattam-Bell, J., & Atkinson, J. (1986). Orientation-specific cortical responses develop in early infancy. Nature, 320, 617-619.
12. Brown, M. W., Wilson, F. A., & Riches, I. P. (1987). Neuronal evidence that inferomedial temporal cortex is more important than hippocampus in certain processes underlying recognition memory. Brain Research, 409, 158-162.
13. Bruce, V., & Young, A. W. (1998). In the eye of the beholder: The science of face perception. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14. Caharel, S., d'Arripe, O., Ramon, M., Jacques, C., & Rossion, B. (2009). Early adaptation to unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes in the right hemisphere: Evidence from the N170 ERP component. Neuropsychologia, 47, 639-643.
15. Caharel, S., Jiang, F., Blanz, V., & Rossion, B. (2009). Recognizing an individual face: 3D shape contributes earlier than 2D surface reflectance information. Neuroimage, 47, 1809-1818.
16. Campbell, F. W., & Maffei, L. (1970). Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system. The Journal of Physiology, 207, 635-652.
17. Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1977). From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. Science, 195, 312-314.
18. Chen, Y., Seth, A. K., Gally, J. A., & Edelman, G. M. (2003). The power of human brain magnetoencephalographic signals can be modulated up or down by changes in an attentive visual task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 3501-3506.
19. Chung, M. S., & Thomson, D. M. (1995). Development of face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 55-87.
20. Crookes, K., & McKone, E. (2009). Early maturity of face recognition: No childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space. Cognition, 111, 219-247.
21. de Haan, M., Johnson, M. H., & Halit, H. (2003). Development of face-sensitive event-related potentials during infancy: A review. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 51, 45-58.
22. Ding, J., Sperling, G., & Srinivasan, R. (2006). Attentional modulation of SSVEP power depends on the network tagged by the flicker frequency. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1016-1029.
23. Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2002). The cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 95-111.
24. Di Russo, F., Pitzalis, S., Aprile, T., Spitoni, G., Patria, F., Stella, A., et al. (2007). Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady-state visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 323-334.
25. Ewbank, M. P., Smith, W. A., Hancock, E. R., & Andrews, T. J. (2008). The M170 reflects a viewpoint-dependent representation for both familiar and unfamiliar faces. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 364-370.
26. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is "special" about face perception? Psychological Review, 105, 482-498.
27. Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. London: Macmillan.
28. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 495-504.
29. Gilaie-Dotan, S., Gelbard-Sagiv, H., & Malach, R. (2010). Perceptual shape sensitivity to upright and inverted faces is reflected in neuronal adaptation. Neuroimage, 50, 383-395.
30. Gilaie-Dotan, S., & Malach, R. (2007). Sub-exemplar shape tuning in human face-related areas. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 325-338.
31. Goffaux, V., Rossion, B., Sorger, B., Schiltz, C., Goebel, R. (2009). Face inversion disrupts the perception of vertical relations between features in the right human occipito-temporal cortex. Journal of Neuropsychology, 3, 45-67.
32. Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2001). Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Research, 41, 2261-2271.
33. Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulusspecific effects. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 14-23.
34. Grill-Spector, K., & Malach, R. (2001). fMR-adaptation: A tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychologica, 107, 293-321
35. Gruber, T., & Muller, M. M. (2005). Oscillatory brain activity dissociates between associative stimulus content in a repetition priming task in the human EEG. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 109-116.
36. Haig, N. D. (1984). The effect of feature displacement on face recognition. Perception, 13, 502-512.
37. Haig, N. D. (1985). How faces differVA new comparative technique. Perception, 14, 601-615.
38. Handy, T. C. (2004). Basic principles of ERP quantification. In T. Handy (Ed.), Event-related potentials: A methods handbook (pp. 33-55), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (B&T).
39. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 223-233.
40. Hecaen, H., & Angelergues, R. (1962). Agnosia for faces (prosopagnosia). Archives of Neurology, 7, 92-100.
41. Heinrich, S. P., & Bach, M. (2001). Adaptation dynamics in pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials. Documenta Ophthalmologica, 102, 141-156.
42. Heinrich, S. P., & Bach, M. (2003). Adaptation characteristics of steady-state motion visual evoked potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 1359-1366.
43. Heinrich, S. P., Mell, D., & Bach, M. (2009). Frequencydomain analysis of fast oddball responses to visual stimuli: A feasibility study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 73, 287-293.
44. Heisz, J. J., Watter, S., & Shedden, J. A. (2006). Automatic face identity encoding at the N170. Vision Research, 46, 4604-4614.
45. Helmholtz, H. (1853). Ü ber einige Gesetze der Vertheilung elektrischer Ströme in körperlichen Leitern mit Anwendung auf die thierisch-elektrischen Versuche [Some laws concerning the distribution of electrical currents in conductors with applications to experiments on animal electricity]. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 89, 211-233.
46. Henson, R. N., & Rugg, M. D. (2003). Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia, 41, 263-270.
47. Henson, R. N., Shallice, T., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Face repetition effects in implicit and explicit memory tests as measured by fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 178-186.
48. Herrmann, C. S. (2001). Human EEG responses to 1-100 Hz flicker: Resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena. Experimental Brain Research, 137, 346-353.
49. Hillger, L. A., & Koenig, O. (1991). Separable mechanisms in face processing, Evidence from hemispheric specialization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 42-58.
50. Hsiao, J. H.-W., & Cottrell, G. (2008). Two fixations suffice in face recognition. Psychological Science, 19, 998-1006.
51. Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2002). Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: A repetition study using ERPs. Neuroimage, 15, 353-372.
52. Jacques, C., d'Arripe, O., & Rossion, B. (2007). The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination. Journal of Vision, 7(8):3, 1-9, http:// www.journalofvision.org/content/7/8/3, doi:10.1167/ 7.8.3.
53. Jacques, C., & Rossion, B. (2006). The speed of individual face categorization. Psychological Science, 17, 485-492.
54. Jacques, C., & Rossion, B. (2009). The initial representation of individual faces in the right occipito-temporal cortex is holistic: Electrophysiological evidence from the composite face illusion. Journal of Vision, 9(6):8, 1-16, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/6/8, doi:10.1167/9.6.8.
55. James, T. W., Humphrey, G. K., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). The effects of visual object priming on brain activation before and after recognition. Current Biology, 10, 1017-1024.
56. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
57. Kaspar, K., Hassler, U., Martens, U., Trujillo-Barreto, N., & Gruber, T. (2010). Steady-state visually evoked potential correlates of object recognition. Brain Research, 1343, 112-121.
58. Keil, A., Gruber, T., Mü ller, M. M., Moratti, S., Stolarova, M., Bradley, M. M., et al. (2003). Early modulation of visual perception by emotional arousal: Evidence from steady-state visual evoked brain potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 195-206.
59. Klopp, J., Halgren, E., Marinkovic, K., & Nenov, V. (1999). Face-selective spectral changes in the human fusiform gyrus. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 676-682.
60. Kovács, G., Zimmer, M., Bankó, E., Harza, I., Antal, A., & Vidnyánszky, Z. (2006). Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 742-753.
61. Krolak-Salmon, P., Hénaff, M. A., Tallon-Baudry, C., Yvert, B., Guénot, M., Vighetto, A., et al. (2003). Human lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex respond to screen flicker. Annals of Neurology, 53, 73-80.
62. Kuefner, D., de Heering, A., Jacques, C., Palmero-Soler, E., &Rossion, B. (2010). Early visually evoked electrophysiological responses over the human brain (P1, N170) show stable patterns of face-sensitivity from 4 years to adulthood. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 67.
63. Kuefner, D., Jacques, C., Prieto, E. A., & Rossion, B. (2010). Electrophysiological correlates of the composite face illusion: Disentangling perceptual and decisional components of holistic face processing in the human brain. Brain and Cognition, 74, 225-238.
64. Leopold, D. A., Bondar, I. V., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature, 442, 572-575.
65. Leopold, D. A., Rhodes, G., Müller, K. M., & Jeffery, L. (2005). The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 897-904.
66. Li, L., Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R. (1993). The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 69, 1918-1929.
67. Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260.
68. Mayes, A. K., Pipingas, A., Silberstein, R. B., & Johnston, P. (2009). Steady state visually evoked potential correlates of static and dynamic emotional face processing. Brain Topography, 22, 145-157.
69. Mazard, A., Schiltz, C., & Rossion, B. (2006). Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 44, 912-922.
70. Mondloch, C. J., Le Grand, R., & Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception, 31, 553-566.
71. Morgan, S. T., Hansen, J. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1996). Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady state visual evoked potential. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 4770-4774.
72. Müller, J. R., Metha, A. B., Krauskopf, J., & Lennie, P. (1999). Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images. Science, 285, 1405-1408.
73. Müller,M.M., Andersen, S., Trujillo, N. J., Valdés-Sosa, P., Malinowski, P., & Hillyard, S. A. (2006). Featureselective attention enhances color signals in early visual areas of the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 14250-14254.
74. Noguchi, Y., Inui, K., & Kakigi, R. (2004). Temporal dynamics of neural adaptation effect in the human visual ventral stream. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 6283-6290.
75. Nunez, P. L. (1981). Electric fields of the brain: The neurophysics of EEG. New York: Oxford University Press.
76. Orban de Xivry, J.-J., Ramon, M., Lefe'vre, P., & Rossion, B. (2008). Reduced fixation on the upper area of personally familiar faces following acquired prosopagnosia. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2, 245-268.
77. O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (1999). Twodimensional reflectance and three-dimensional shape contributions to recognition of faces across viewpoint. Vision Research, 39, 3145-3155.
78. Paller, K. A., Gonsalves, B., Grabowecky, M., Bozic, V. S., & Yamada, S. (2000). Electrophysiological correlates of recollecting faces of known and unknown individuals. Neuroimage, 11, 98-110.
79. Parkin, A. J., & Williamson, P. (1987). Cerebral lateralisation at different stages of facial processing. Cortex, 23, 99-110.
80. Pastor, M. A., Artieda, J., Arbizu, J., Valencia, M., & Masdeu, J. C. (2003). Human cerebral activation during steady-state visual-evoked responses. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 11621-11627.
81. Peachey, N. S., DeMarco, P. J., Jr., Ubilluz, R., & Yee, W. (1994). Short-term changes in the response characteristics of the human visual evoked potential. Vision Research, 34, 2823-2831.
82. Perrett, D. I., Mistlin, A. J., Chitty, A. J., Smith, P. A., Potter, D. D., Broennimann, R., et al. (1988). Specialized face processing and hemispheric asymmetry in man and monkey: Evidence from single unit and reaction time studies. Behavioral Brain Research, 29, 245-258.
83. Puce, A., Allison, T., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1995). Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. Journal of Neurophysiology, 74, 1192-1199.
84. Rager, G., & Singer, W. (1998). The response of cat visual cortex to flicker stimuli of variable frequency. European Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 1856-1877.
85. Ramon, M., Dricot, L., & Rossion, B. (2010). Personally familiar faces are perceived categorically in faceselective regions other than the FFA. European Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 1587-1598.
86. Regan, D. (1966). Some characteristics of average steadystate and transient responses evoked by modulated light. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 20, 238-248.
87. Regan, D. (1989). Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. New York: Elsevier.
88. Regan, D. (2009). Some early uses of evoked brain responses in investigations of human visual function. Vision Research, 49, 882-897.
89. Rhodes, G., Michie, P. T., Hughes, M. E., & Byatt, G. (2009). The fusiform face area and occipital face area show sensitivity to spatial relations in faces. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 721-733.
90. Ringo, J. L. (1996). Stimulus specific adaptation in inferior temporal and medial temporal cortex of the monkey. Behavioral Brain Research, 76, 191-197.
91. Rolls, E. T., & Tovee, M. J. (1995). Sparseness of the neuronal representation of stimuli in the primate temporal visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 713-726.
92. Rossion, B. (2009). Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: The perceptual field hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 132, 300-312.
93. Rossion, B., Delvenne, J.-F., Debatisse, D., Goffaux, V., Bruyer, R., Crommelinck, M., et al. (1999). Spatiotemporal brain localization of the face inversion effect. Biological Psychology, 50, 173-189.
94. Rossion, B., & Jacques, C. (2011). The N170: Understanding the time course of face perception in the human brain. In S. Luck & E. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ERP components. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
95. Rousselet, G. A., Husk, J. S., Bennett, P. J., & Sekuler, A. B. (2007). Single-trial EEG dynamics of object and face visual processing. Neuroimage, 36, 843-862.
96. Sawamura, H., Orban, G. A., & Vogels, R. (2006). Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: A single-cell study of the fMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron, 49, 307-318.
97. Schiltz, C., & Rossion, B. (2006). Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuroimage, 32, 1385-1394.
98. Schiltz, C., Sorger, B., Caldara, R., Ahmed, F., Mayer, E., Goebel, R., et al. (2006). Impaired face discrimination in acquired prosopagnosia is associated with abnormal response to individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 574-586.
99. Schweinberger, S. R., Pfutze, E. M., & Sommer, W. (1995). Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognitionVEvidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 722-736.
100. Sergent, J. (1984). An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 221-242.
101. Sergent, J. (1989). Structural processing of faces. In H. Ellis & A. W. Young (Eds.), Handbook of research on face processing (pp. 57-91). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
102. Sergent, J., Ohta, S., & MacDonald, B. (1992). Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. Brain, 115, 15-36.
103. Snyder, A. Z. (1991). Dipole source localization in the study of EP generators: A critique. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 80, 321-325.
104. Spekreijse, H., Estevez, O., & Reits, D. (1977). Visual evoked potentials and the physiological analysis of visual processes in man. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.), Visual evoked potentials in man: New development (pp. 16-89). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
105. Srinivasan, R., Bibi, F. A., & Nunez, P. L. (2006). Steadystate visual evoked potentials: Distributed local sources and wave-like dynamics are sensitive to flicker frequency. Brain Topography, 18, 167-187.
106. Srinivasan, R., Russell, D. P., Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (1999). Increased synchronization of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 5435-5448.
107. Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A. L., & Collins, D. (2006). Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: The N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1488-1497.
108. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 225-245.
109. Taylor, M. J., McCarthy, G., Saliba, E., & Degiovanni, E. (1999). ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 910-915.
110. Toffanin, P., de Jong, R., Johnson, A., &Martens, S. (2009). Using frequency tagging to quantify attentional deployment in a visual divided attention task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72, 289-298.
111. Tsao, D. Y., Freiwald, W. A., Tootell, R. B.,&Livingstone, M. S. (2006). A, cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science, 311, 670-674.
112. Tyler, C. W., & Kaitz, M. (1977). Movement adaptation in the visual evoked response. Experimental Brain Research, 27, 203-209.
113. Van der Tweel, L. H., & Verduyn Lunel, H. F. E. (1965). Human visual responses to sinusoidally modulated light. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 18, 587-598.
114. Van Dijk, B., & Spekreijse, H. (1990). Localization of electric and magnetic sources of brain activity. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.), Visual evoked potentials (pp. 57-74). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
115. Vialatte, F. B., Maurice, M., Dauwels, J., & Cichocki, A. (2009). Steady state visual evoked potentials in the delta range (0.5-5 Hz). Paper presented at the 15th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, ICONIP, Auckland, New Zealand, November 25-28, 2008, LNCS, Part I, 5506:399-406.
116. Weiner, K. S., & Grill-Spector, K. (2010). Sparselydistributed organization of face and limb activations in human ventral temporal cortex. Neuroimage, 52, 1559-1573.
117. Winston, J. S., Henson, R. N., Fine-Goulden, M. R., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1830-1839.
118. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.
119. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.
120. Young, M. P., & Yamane, S. (1992). Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. Science, 256, 1327-1331.
121. Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Current Biology, 15, 2256-2262.