Visual mismatch negativity and its importance in visual cognitive sciences

NeuroReport

Volumn 22, Issue 14, 2011, Pages 669-673

  Kimura, Motohiro ^a   Schröger, Erich ^b   Czigler, István ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

event related brain potential; unintentional temporal context based prediction in vision; visual mismatch negativity

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; COGNITION; COLOR; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LEARNING; LUMINANCE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; PERCEPTUAL SEQUENCE LEARNING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; COGNITION; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 80052514266     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834973ba     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Näätänen R, Gaillard AWK, Mäntysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol 1978; 42:313-329.
2. Czigler I. Visual mismatch negativity: violation of nonattended environmental regularities. J Psychophysiol 2007; 21:224-230. (Pubitemid 351516007)
3. Pazo-Alvarez P, Cadaveira F, Amenedo E. MMN in the visual modality: a review. Biol Psychol 2003; 63:199-236. (Pubitemid 36802305)
4. Kimura M, Katayama J, Ohira H, Schröger E. Visual mismatch negativity: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm. Psychophysiology 2009; 46:402-409.
5. Kimura M, Schröger E, Czigler I, Ohira H. Human visual system automatically encodes sequential regularities of discrete events. J Cogn Neurosci 2010; 22:1124-1139.
6. Kimura M, Widmann A, Schröger E. Human visual system automatically represents large-scale sequential regularities. Brain Res 2010; 1317:165-179.
7. Näätänen R. Attention and Brain Function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1992.
8. Kimura M, Kondo H, Ohira H, Schrö ger E. Unintentional temporal-context-based prediction of facial expression: an electrophysiological study. Under revision.
9. Czigler I, Weisz J, Winkler I. ERPs and deviance detection: visual mismatch negativity to repeated visual stimuli. Neurosci Lett 2006; 401:178-182. (Pubitemid 44269288)
10. Stefanics G, Kimura M, Czigler I. Visual mismatch negativity reveals automatic detection of sequential regularity violation. Front Hum Neurosci 2011; 5. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00046.
11. Kimura M, Widmann A, Schröger E. Top-down attention affects sequential regularity representation in the human visual system. Int J Psychophysiol 2010; 77:126-134.
12. Schröger E. Mismatch negativity: a microphone into auditory memory. J Psychophysiol 2007; 21:138-146.
13. Winkler I. Interpreting the mismatch negativity. J Psychophysiol 2007; 21:147-163. (Pubitemid 351516001)
14. Schubotz RI. Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework. Trends Cogn Sci 2007; 11:211-218. (Pubitemid 46654823)
15. Freyd JJ, Finke RA. Representational momentum. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1984; 10:126-132.
16. Hayes AE, Freyd JJ. Representational momentum when attention is divided. Vis Cogn 2002; 9:8-27. (Pubitemid 34144630)
17. Hubbard TL, Bharucha JJ. Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Percept Psychophys 1988; 44:211-221.
18. Hubbard TL. Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: a review of the findings. Psychon Bull Rev 2005; 12:822-851. (Pubitemid 43341538)
19. Nijhawan R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 1994; 370:256-257.
20. Munger MP, Owens TR. Representational momentum and the flash-lag effect. Vis Cogn 2004; 11:81-103. (Pubitemid 38139372)
21. Eagleman DM, Sejnowski TJ. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 2000; 287:2036-2038. (Pubitemid 30158684)
22. Canfield RL, Haith MM. Young infants' visual expectations for symmetric and asymmetric stimulus sequence. Dev Psychol 1991; 27:198-208.
23. Huettel SA, Mack PB, McCarthy G. Perceiving patterns in random series: dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5:485-490. (Pubitemid 34454256)
24. Clegg BA, DiGirolamo GJ, Keele SW. Sequential learning. Trends Cogn Sci 1998; 2:275-281.
25. Kimura M, Ohira H, Schröger E. Localizing sensory and cognitive systems for pre-attentive visual deviance detection: an sLORETA analysis of the data of Kimura et al. (2009). Neurosci Lett 2010; 485:198-203.
26. Rao H, Han S, Jiang Y, Xue Y, Gu H, Cui Y, et al. Engagement of the prefrontal cortex in representational momentum. Neuroimage 2004; 23:98-103. (Pubitemid 39119439)
27. Friston KJ. A theory of cortical responses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005; 360:815-836.
28. Blakemore SJ, Wolpert D, Frith CD. Why can't you tickle yourself? Neuroreport 2000; 11:R11-R16. (Pubitemid 30622268)
29. Posner MI. Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 1980; 32:3-25.
30. Gregory RL. Perceptions as hypotheses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1980; 290:181-197.
31. Wilson M, Knoblich G. The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychol Bull 2005; 131:460-473. (Pubitemid 40688259)
32. Bar M. The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends Cogn Sci 2007; 11:280-289. (Pubitemid 46962332)
33. Doherty JR, Rao A, Mesulam MM, Nobre AC. Synergistic effect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention. J Neurosci 2005; 25:8259-8266. (Pubitemid 41292120)
34. Summerfield C, Egner T. Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 2009; 13:403-409.
35. Schütz-Bosbach S, Prinz W. Prospective coding in event representation. Cogn Process 2007; 8:93-102. (Pubitemid 46835844)