Top-down attention affects sequential regularity representation in the human visual system

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 126-134

  Kimura, Motohiro ^a,b   Widmann, Andreas ^a   Schröger, Erich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b JAPAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Top down attention; Visual mismatch negativity; Visual regularity representation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADULT; ATTENTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954386108     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alain C., Woods D.L. Attentional modulates auditory pattern memory as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 1997, 34:534-546.
2. Alho K. Cerebral generators of mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic counterpart (MMNm) elicited by sound changes. Ear Hear. 1995, 16:38-51.
3. Alho K., Woods D.L., Algazi A., Näätänen R. Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992, 82:356-368.
4. Berti S., Schröger E. Visual distraction: a behavioral and event-related brain potential study in humans. NeuroReport 2006, 17:151-155.
5. Bubic A., von Cramon D.Y., Schubotz R.I. Prediction, cognition and the brain. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2010, 4:1-15.
6. Cant B.R., Hume A.L., Shaw N.A. Effects of luminance on the pattern visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1978, 45:496-504.
7. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
8. Czigler I. Visual mismatch negativity: Violation of nonattended environmental regularities. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 21:224-230.
9. Czigler I., Balázs L., Winkler I. Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. Psychophysiology 2002, 39:869-873.
10. Czigler I., Balázs L., Pató L. Visual change detection: Event-related brain potentlas are dependent on stimulus location in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 2004, 364:149-153.
11. Denham S.L., Winkler I. The role of predictive models in the formation of auditory streams. J. Physiol. Paris 2006, 100:154-170.
12. Deouell L.Y. The frontal generator of the mismatch negativity revisited. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 21:188-203.
13. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav. Brain Sci. 1988, 11:357-374.
14. Eimer M., Goscheke T., Schlaghecken F., Stürmer B. Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1996, 22:970-987.
15. Harter M.R., Previc F.H. Size-specific information channels and selective attention: Visual evoked potential and behavioral measures. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1978, 45:628-640.
16. Heslenfeld D.J. Visual mismatch negativity. Detection of Change: Event-Related Potential and fMRI Findings 2003, 41-60. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. J. Polich (Ed.).
17. Kaukoranta E., Sams M., Hari R., Hämäläinen M., Näätänen R. Reactions of human auditory cortex to a change in tone duration. Hear. Res. 1989, 41:15-22.
18. Kenemans J.L., Jong T.G., Verbaten M.N. Detection of visual change: mismatch or rareness?. NeuroReport 2003, 14:1239-1242.
19. Kiebel S.J., von Kriegstein K., Daunizeau J., Friston K.J. Recognizing sequences of sequences. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5:e1000464.
20. Kimura M., Katayama J., Murohashi H. Involvement of memory-comparison-based change detection in visual distraction. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:445-457.
21. Kimura M., Katayama J., Murohashi H. Underlying mechanisms of the P3a task-difficulty effect. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:731-741.
22. Kimura M., Katayama J., Ohira H., Schröger E. Visual mismatch negativity: New evidence from the equiprobable paradigm. Psychophysiology 2009, 46:402-409.
23. Kimura M., Schröger E., Czigler I., Ohira H. Human visual system automatically encodes sequential regularities of discrete events. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:1124-1139.
24. Kimura M., Widmann A., Schröger E. Human visual system automatically represents large-scale sequential regularities. Brain Res. 2010, 1317:165-179.
25. Näätänen R., Alho K. Higher-order processes in auditory change detection. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1997, 2:44-45.
26. Näätänen R., Gaillard A.W.K., Mantysalo S. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol. 1978, 42:313-329.
27. Näätänen R., Simpson M., Loveless N.E. Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials. Biol. Psychol. 1982, 14:53-98.
28. Näätänen R., Paavilainen P., Reinikainen K. Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man?. Neurosci. Lett. 1989, 107:347-352.
29. Näätänen R., Tervaniemi M., Sussman E., Paavilainen P., Winkler I. "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex. Trends Neurosci. 2001, 24:283-288.
30. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., van den Wildenberg W., Ridderinkhof K.R. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2003, 3:17-26.
31. Pazo-Alvarez P., Cadaveira F., Amenedo E. MMN in the visual modality: a review. Biol. Psychol. 2003, 63:199-236.
32. Pazo-Alvarez P., Amenedo E., Cadaveira F. Automatic detection of motion direction changes in the human brain. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 19:1978-1986.
33. Scherg M., Vajsar J., Picton T.W. A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1989, 1:336-355.
34. Schlögl A., Keinrath C., Zimmermann D., Scherer R., Leeb R., Pfurtscheller G. A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:98-104.
35. Schröger E. Higher-order processes in auditory change detection: Response from Schröger. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1997, 2:45-46.
36. Schröger E. Mismatch negativity: A microphone into auditory memory. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 21:138-146.
37. Schröger E., Wolff C. Mismatch response of the human brain to changes in sound location. NeuroReport 1996, 7:3005-3008.
38. Schubotz R. Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2007, 11:211-218.
39. Soltani M., Knight R. Neural origins of the P300. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 2000, 14:199-224.
40. Stagg C., Hindley P., Tales A., Butler S. Visual mismatch negativity: the detection of stimulus change. NeuroReport 2004, 15:659-663.
41. Sussman E. A new view on the MMN and attention debate. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 21:164-175.
42. Sussman E., Gumenyuk V. Organization of sequential sounds in auditory memory. NeuroReport 2005, 16:1519-1523.
43. Sussman E., Ritter W., Vaughan H.G. Predictability of stimulus deviance and the mismatch negativity. NeuroReport 1998, 9:4167-4170.
44. Sussman E., Winkler I., Huotilainen M., Ritter W., Näätänen R. Top-down effects can modify the initially stimulus-driven auditory organization. Cogn. Brain Res. 2002, 13:393-405.
45. Sussman E., Winkler I., Wang W.J. MMN and attention: Competition for deviance detection. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:430-435.
46. Sutton S., Braren M., Zubin J., John E.R. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 1965, 150:1187-1188.
47. Tobimatsu S., Kurita-Tashima S., Nakayama-Hiromatsu M., Akazawa K., Kato M. Age-related changes in pattern visual evoked potentials: differential effects of luminance, contrast and check size. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1993, 88:12-19.
48. Verleger R. Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3. Behav. Brain Sci. 1988, 11:343-427.
49. Winkler I. Interpreting the mismatch negativity. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 21:147-163.
50. Woldorff M.G., Hackley S.A., Hillyard S.A. The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones. Psychophysiology 1991, 28:30-42.
51. Yucel G., McCarthy G., Belger A. fMRI reveals that involuntary visual deviance processing is resource limited. Neuroimage 2007, 34:1245-1252.