Hydrophilic interaction chromatography versus reversed phase liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry: Effect of electrospray ionization source geometry on sensitivity

Journal of Chromatography A

Volumn 1356, Issue , 2014, Pages 211-220

  Periat, Aurélie ^a   Kohler, Isabelle ^a   Bugey, Aurélie ^b   Bieri, Stefan ^b   Versace, François ^c   Staub, Christian ^a,c   Guillarme, Davy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b Official Food and Veterinary Control Authority of Geneva   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY CENTER OF LEGAL MEDICINE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Electrospray ionization; ESI; HILIC MS; Hydrophilic interaction chromatography; Sensitivity; Source geometry

Indexed keywords

ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION; FLOW RATE; GEOMETRY; MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ESI; HILIC-MS; HYDROPHILIC INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY; SOURCE GEOMETRY;

LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;

ANALYZER; ARTICLE; CHROMATOGRAPH; ELECTROSPRAY; HYDROPHILIC INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REVERSED PHASE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION; ESI; HILIC-MS; HYDROPHILIC INTERACTION CHROMATOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY; SOURCE GEOMETRY;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, REVERSE-PHASE; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SMALL MOLECULE LIBRARIES; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY; WATER;

EID: 84904747446     PISSN: 00219673     EISSN: 18733778     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.06.066     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. McCalley D.V. Is hydrophilic interaction chromatography with silica columns a viable alternative to reversed-phase liquid chromatography for the analysis of ionisable compounds?. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1171:46-55.
2. Ruta J., Boccard J., Cabooter D., Rudaz S., Desmet G., Veuthey J.L., Guillarme D. Method development for pharmaceutics: Some solutions for tuning selectivity in reversed phase and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2012, 63:95-105.
3. Guillarme D., Ruta J., Rudaz S., Veuthey J.L. New trends in fast and high-resolution liquid chromatography: a critical comparison of existing approaches. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 397:1069-1082.
4. Kumar A., Heaton J.C., McCalley D.V. Practical investigation of the factors that affect the selectivity in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1276:33-46.
5. Nguyen H.P., Schug K.A. The advantages of ESI-MS detection in conjunction with HILIC mode separations: fundamentals and applications. J. Sep. Sci. 2008, 31:1465-1480.
6. Naidong W. Bioanalytical liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry methods on underivatized silica columns with aqueous/organic mobile phases. J. Chromatogr. B 2003, 796:209-224.
7. Mitchell C.R., Bao Y., Benz N.J., Zhang S. Comparison of the sensitivity of evaporative universal detectors and LC/MS in the HILIC and the reversed-phase HPLC modes. J. Chromatogr. B 2009, 877:4133-4139.
8. Apostolou C., Kousoulos C., Dotsikas Y., Loukas Y.L. Comparison of hydrophilic interaction and reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometric detection for the determination of three pharmaceuticals in human plasma. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2008, 22:1393-1402.
9. Naidong W., Shou W., Chen Y.L., Jiang X. Novel liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric methods using silica columns and aqueous-organic mobile phases for quantitative analysis of polar ionic analytes in biological fluids. J. Chromatogr. B 2001, 754:387-399.
10. Michi M., Ferrari L. Validation of a high-sensitivity assay for zatebradiWaters Acquityne in dried blood spots of human blood at pg/ml concentrations using HILIC-MS/MS. Bioanalysis 2010, 2:1863-1871.
11. Grumbach E.S., Wagrowski-Diehl D.M., Mazzeo E.R., Alden B., Iraneta P.C. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography using silica columns for the retention of polar analytes and enhanced ESI-MS sensitivity. LCGC North Am. 2004, 22:1010-1023.
12. ChiritaTampu R., West C., Fougere L., Elfakir C. Advantages of HILIC mobile phases for LC-ESI-MS-MS analysis of neurotransmitters. LC-GC Eur. 2013, 26:128-140.
13. Periat A., Boccard J., Veuthey J.-L., Rudaz S., Guillarme D. Systematic comparison of sensitivity between hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography and reversed phase liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1312:49-57.
14. Gray N., Heaton J., Musenga A., Cowan D.A., Plumb R.S., Smith N.W. Comparison of reversed-phase and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography for the quantification of ephedrines using medium-resolution accurate mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1289:37-46.
15. Manisali I., Chen D.D.Y., Schneider B.B. Electrospray ionization source geometry for mass spectrometry: past, present, and future. Trends Anal. Chem. 2006, 25:243-256.
16. Stahnke H., Kittlaus S., Kempe G., Hemmerling C., Alder L. The influence of electrospray ion source design on matrix effects. J. Mass Spectrom. 2012, 47:875-884.
17. Rodriguez-Aller M., Gurny R., Veuthey J.L., Guillarme D. Coupling ultra high-pressure liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry: constraints and possible applications. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1292:2-18.
18. de Person M., Chaimbault P., Elfakir C. Characterization of low-molecular weight peptides in champagne wine by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 43:204-215.
19. Holcapek M., Volna K., Jandera P., Kolarova L., Lemr K., Exner M., Cirkva A. Effects of ion-pairing reagents on the electrospray signal suppression of sulphonated dyes and intermediates. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 39:43-50.
20. Mei H., Hsieh Y., Nardo C., Xu X., Wang S., Ng K., Korfmacher W.A. Investigation of matrix effects in bioanalytical high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric assays: application to drug discovery. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17:97-103.
21. Ghosh C., Shinde C.P., Chakraborty B.S. Influence of ionization source design on matrix effects during LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis. J. Chromatogr. B 2012, 893-894:193-200.
22. Cech N.B., Enke C.G. Practical implications of some recent studies in electrospray ionization fundamentals. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2001, 20:362-387.
23. consulted in January 2014. http://www.absciex.com/Documents/Downloads/Literature/turbo-v-ion-source-operator-guide-eng.pdf.
24. Mordehai A., Fjeldsted J. Agilent Technical Note 5990-3494 2009.
25. consulted in January 2014. http://fscimage.fishersci.com/cmsassets/downloads/segment/Scientific/pdf/Literature/LCMS_OptimizeMobilePhase.pdf%3F%26storeId=10652.
26. Ekdahl A., Johansson M.C., Ahnoff M. Tracing and separating plasma components causing matrix effects in hydrophilic interaction chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 2013, 923-924:83-91.