|
Volumn 877, Issue 32, 2009, Pages 4133-4139
|
Comparison of the sensitivity of evaporative universal detectors and LC/MS in the HILIC and the reversed-phase HPLC modes
|
Author keywords
Corona CAD; ELSD; ESI; HILIC; Mass spectrometry; Response factor; RPLC; Sensitivity
|
Indexed keywords
CHARGED AEROSOLS;
DETECTION PROCESS;
ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY;
ELSD;
EVAPORATIVE LIGHT SCATTERING DETECTORS;
HYDROPHILIC INTERACTION;
LIQUID INTERFACE;
MOBILE PHASE;
MOBILE PHASIS;
MODE OF OPERATIONS;
POLAR COMPOUNDS;
POLAR ORGANIC SOLVENTS;
RESPONSE FACTOR;
REVERSED PHASE;
REVERSED PHASE HPLC;
CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS;
DETECTORS;
HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;
HYDROPHILICITY;
MASS SPECTROMETERS;
MASS SPECTROMETRY;
ORGANIC SOLVENTS;
SULFONATION;
PHASE INTERFACES;
ORGANIC SOLVENT;
THYMINE;
AEROSOL;
ARTICLE;
ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY;
EVAPORATIVE LIGHT SCATTERING DETECTOR;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
REVERSED PHASE HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY;
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;
TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;
CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID;
CHROMATOGRAPHY, REVERSE-PHASE;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SOLUBILITY;
SPECTROMETRY, MASS, ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION;
WATER;
|
EID: 70649105565
PISSN: 15700232
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.10.027 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (71)
|
References (30)
|