Minimal detectable change for mobility and patient-reported tools in people with osteoarthritis awaiting arthroplasty

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Naylor, Justine M ^a,b,c   Hayen, Andrew ^c   Davidson, Edward ^d   Hackett, Danella ^e   Harris, Ian A ^a,b,c   Kamalasena, Gihan ^a   Mittal, Rajat ^b  

^a LIVERPOOL HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c INGHAM INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^d NEPEAN HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e Fairfield Hospital Prairiewood   (Australia)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Clinimetrics; Osteoarthritis; Patient reported outcome measures; Timed mobility tests

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTHRALGIA; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FUNCTION TEST; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISABILITY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE INJURY AND OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOME SCORE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SIX MINUTE WALK TEST; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; UP AND GO TEST; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; AUSTRALIA; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABILITY; EXERCISE TEST; HIP; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; KNEE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGERY; TIME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW SOUTH WALES; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS; WAITING LISTS;

EID: 84904742277     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-235     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Monitoring in osteoarthritis. Peat G, Porcheret M, Bedson J, Ward AM, Evidence-Based Medical Monitoring: From Principles to Practice UK: Blackwell Publishing, Glasziou P, Aronson J, Irwig L, 2008 335 356
2. The value of measuring variability in osteoarthritis pain. Allen KD, J Rheumatol 2007 34 2132 2133 17985413
3. Telephone-based self management of osteoarthritis: a randomized trial. Allen KD, Oddone EZ, Coffman CJ, Datta SK, Juntilla KA, Lindquist JH, Walker TA, Weinberger M, Bosworth HB, Ann Intern Med 2010 153 570 579 10.7326/0003-4819- 153-9-201011020-00006 21041576
4. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM, J Clin Epi 2006 59 1033 1039 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015 (Pubitemid 44376776)
5. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and ambulation tests, the 36-item short-form health survey, and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with parkinsonism. Steffen T, Seney M, Phys Ther 2008 88 733 746 10.2522/ptj.20070214 18356292 (Pubitemid 351770181)
6. How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the berg balance scale in elderly people. Donoghue D, Stokes EK, J Rehabil Med 2009 41 343 346 10.2340/16501977-0337 19363567
7. When minimal detectable change exceeds a diagnostic test-based threshold change value for an outcome measure: resolving the conflict. Stratford PW, Riddle DL, Phys Ther 2012 92 1338 1347 10.2522/ptj.20120002 22767887
8. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC, J Clin Epidemiol 2007 60 34 42 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 17161752 (Pubitemid 44856236)
9. Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS). Van Kampen DA, Willems WJ, van Beers LWAH, Castelein RM, Scholtes VAB, Terwee CB, J Ortho Surg Res 2013 8 40 10.1186/1749-799X-8-40
10. Problems in measuring or interpreting change in patient outcomes. Carr A, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002 10 503 505 10.1053/joca.2002.0805 12127829 (Pubitemid 34919064)
11. Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes. Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Knol DL, De Boer MR, De Vet HC, J Clin Epidemiol 2009 62 1062 1067 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.011 19230609
12. Do patient-reported outcome measures in hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation have robust measurement attributes? A systematic review. Alviar MJ, Olver J, Brand C, Tropea J, Hale P, Pirpiris M, Khan F, J Rehabil Med 2011 43 572 583 10.2340/16501977-0828 21607295
13. Measures of knee function. Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roos EM, Arthritis Care Res 2011 63 S11 208 S228 10.1002/acr.20632
14. Measurement properties of performance-based measures to asses physical function in hip and knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Dobson F, Hinman RS, Hall M, Terwee CB, Roos EM, Bennell KL, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012 20 1548 1562 10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.015 22944525
15. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome questionnaires when assessing hip and groin disability: a systematic review. Thorborg K, Roos EM, Bartels EM, Petersen J, Hölmich P, Br J Sports Med 2010 44 1186 1196 10.1136/bjsm.2009.060889 19666629
16. Performance-based methods for measuring the physical function of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties. Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Steultjens MPM, Dekker J, Rheumatology 2006 45 890 902 10.1093/rheumatology/kei267 16461441 (Pubitemid 43985382)
17. Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement. Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, Falissard B, Logeart I, Bellamy N, Bombardier C, Felson D, Hochberg M, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Ann Rheum Dis 2005 64 29 33 10.1136/ard.2004.022905 15208174 (Pubitemid 40075270)
18. Osteoarthritis antirheumatic drug trials. III. Setting the delta for clinical trials-results of a consensus development (Delphi) exercise. Bellamy N, Carette S, Ford PM, Kean WF, le Riche NG, Lussier A, Wells GA, Campbell J, J Rheumatol 1992 19 451 457 1578462
19. The timed 'Up and Go' Test: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S, J Amer Geriatric Soc 1991 39 142 148
20. Six minute walking distance in healthy elderly subjects. Troosters T, Gosselink R, Decramer M, Eur Respir J 1999 14 270 274 10515400 (Pubitemid 29461288)
21. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S, Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003 1 17 10.1186/1477-7525-1-17 12801417 (Pubitemid 39111979)
22. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)-validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander S, Klässbo M, Roos EM, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003 4 10 10.1186/1471-2474-4- 10 12777182
23. OACCP ACI Musculoskeletal Network. Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Program Model of Care. Agency for Clinical Innovation. 2012 http://www.aci.health.nsw. gov.au/data/assets/pdf-file/0020/165305/Osteoarthritis-Chronic-Care-Program- Mode-of-Care.pdf#zoom=100
24. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Bland JM, Altman DG, Lancet 1986 1 8476 307 310 2868172 (Pubitemid 16134762)
25. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Bland JM, Altman DG, Stat Methods Med Res 1999 8 135 160 10.1191/096228099673819272 10501650 (Pubitemid 29425900)
26. Measures of Physical Performance Assessments Self-Paced Walk Test (SPWT), Stair Climb Test (SCT), Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Chair Stand Test (CST), Timed Up & Go (TUG), Sock Test, Lift and Carry Test (LCT), and Car Task. Bennell K, Dobson F, Hinman R, Arthritis Care Res 2011 63 350 S370 10.1002/acr.20538
27. Relationship between self-reported and performance-based tests in a hip and knee joint replacement population. Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR, Syed KA, Mahomed NN, Clin Rheumatol 2009 28 253 257 10.1007/s10067-008-1021-y 18853222
28. Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD, Penney D, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005 6 3 10.1186/1471-2474-6-3 15679884 (Pubitemid 40300841)
29. Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: six-minute walk test, berg balance scale, timed up & go test, and gait speeds. Steffen TM, Hacker TA, Mollinger L, Phys Ther 2002 82 128 137 11856064 (Pubitemid 34112999)
30. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Roos EM, Lohmander LS, Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003 1 64 10.1186/1477-7525-1-64 14613558 (Pubitemid 39111932)
31. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ, Dawson J, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007 89-B 1010 1014 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424 (Pubitemid 47492792)
32. Can the oxford scores be used to monitor symptomatic progression of patients awaiting knee or hip arthroplasty? Naylor JM, Kamalasena G, Hayen G, Harris IA, Adie S, J Arthroplasty 2013 28 1454 1458 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.003 23575210
33. Altman DG, Practical Statistics for Medical Research London: Chapman & Hall 1991
34. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL, Psychol Bull 1979 86 420 428 18839484
35. Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Stratford PW, Goldsmith CH, Phys Ther 1997 77 745 750 9225846 (Pubitemid 27342319)
36. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Atkinson G, Nevill AM, Sports Med 1998 26 4 217 238 10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002 9820922 (Pubitemid 28505200)
37. Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: problems and solutions. Singh J, Sloan JA, Johanson NA, J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010 18 2 72 82 20118324
38. The reliability, consistency, and clinical application of a numeric pain rating scale. Stratford PW, Spadoni G, Physiother Can 2001 53 88 91
39. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in hip osteoarthritis patients. Ornetti P, Parratte S, Gossec L, Tavernier C, Argenson JN, Roos EM, Guillemin F, Maillefert JF, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010 18 522 529 10.1016/j.joca.2009.12.007 20060086
40. Comparison of the reliability, responsiveness, and construct validity of 4 different questionnaires for evaluating outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Impellizzeri FM, Mannion AF, Leunig M, Bizzini M, Naal FD, J Arthroplasty 2011 26 861 869 10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.027 21074964
41. Is 1-to-1 therapy superior to group- or home-based therapy after knee arthroplasty? A randomized, superiority trial. Ko V, Naylor JM, Harris IA, Crosbie J, Yeo AET, Mittal R, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013 95 21 1942 1949 10.2106/JBJS.L.00964 24196464
42. The Longitudinal Examination of Arthritis Pain (LEAP) Study: relationships between weekly fluctuations in patient-rated joint pain and other health outcomes. Hutchings A, Calloway M, Choy E, Hooper M, Hunter DJ, Jordan JM, Zhang Y, Baser O, Long S, Palmer L, J Rheumatol 2007 34 2291 2300 17937461 (Pubitemid 350076893)