Performance-based methods for measuring the physical function of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: A systematic review of measurement properties

Rheumatology

Volumn 45, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 890-902

  Terwee, C B ^a   Mokkink, L B ^a   Steultjens, M P M ^a   Dekker, J ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Osteoarthritis; Performance based method; Reproducibility of results; Systematic review; Validation study

Indexed keywords

CINAHL; CLIMBING; CONSENSUS; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; EMBASE; ERROR; FUNCTION TEST; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDLINE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCINFO; QUALITY CONTROL; RATING SCALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WALKING;

EXERCISE TEST; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33745612469     PISSN: 14620324     EISSN: 14620332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei267     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Bellamy N, Kirwan J, Boers M et al. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol 1997;24:799-802.
2. Kreibich DN, Vaz M, Bourne RB et al. What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement? Clin Orthop 1996:221-5.
3. Marks R. Walking time measures for evaluating OA of the knee. Physiotherapy 1994;50:5-8.
4. Piva SR, Fitzgerald GK, Irrgang JJ, Bouzubar F, Starz TW. Get up and go test in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:284-9.
5. Steultjens MPM, Dekker J, van Baar ME, Oostendorp RAB, Bijlsma JWJ. Internal consistency and validity of an observational method for assessing disability in mobility in patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1999;12:19-25.
6. Odding E, Valkenburg HA, Stam HJ, Hofman A. Assessing joint pain complaints and locomotor disability in the Rotterdam Study: Effect of population selection and assessment mode. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:189-93.
7. Birrell F, Johnell O, Silman A. Projecting the need for hip replacement over the next three decades: Influence of changing demography and threshold for surgery. Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:569-72.
8. Bot SDM, Terwee CB, van der Windt DAWM, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HCW. Psychometric evaluation of self-report questionnaires - the development of a checklist. In: Ader HJ, Mellenbergh GJ, ed. Second workshop on research methodology, 25-27 June, 2003. Amsterdam: VU University Amsterdam 2003: 161-8.
9. Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J et al. Evaluating quality of life and health status instruments: Development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther 1996;18:979-92.
10. Bombardier C, Tugwell P. Methodological considerations in functional assessment. J Rheumatol 1987;14(Suppl. 15):6-10.
11. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991.
12. de Vet HCW. Observer reliability and agreement. In: Armitage P, Colton T, eds. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. New York: John Wiley, 1998:3123-8.
13. Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Controlled Clinical Trials 1991;12: 142S-58S.
14. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986:307-10.
16. Ravaud P, Giraudeau B, Auleley GR, Edouard-Noël R, Dougados M, Chastang Cl. Assessing smallest detectable change over time in continuous structural outcome measures: Application to radiological change in knee osteoarthritis. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:1225-30.
17. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life. The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003;41:582-92.
18. de Vet HCW, Ader HJ, Terwee CB, Pouwer F. Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36. Qual Life Res 2005;14:1203-18.
19. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995;4:293-307.
20. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality of life outcomes. N Engl J Med 1996;334:835-40.
21. Terwee CB, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF, Bossuyt PMM. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Qual Life Res 2003;12:349-62.
22. Hays RD, Hadorn D. Responsiveness to change: An aspect of validity, not a separate dimension. Qual Life Res 1992;1:73-5.
23. Rejeski WJ, Ettinger WH Jr, Schumaker S, James P, Burns R, Elam JT. Assessing performance-related disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1995;3:157-67.
24. Stratford PW, Kennedy D, Pagura SMC, Gollish JD. The relationship between self-report and performance-related measures: Questioning the content validity of timed tests. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49:535-40.
25. Marks R, Quinney HA, Wessel J. Proprioceptive sensibility in women with normal and osteoarthritic knee joints. Clin Rheumatol 1993; 12:170-5.
26. Marks R. Reliability and validity of self-paced walking time measures for knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1994;7:50-3.
27. Price LG, Hewett JE, Kay DR, Minor MA. Five-minute walking test of aerobic fitness for people with arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1988;1:33-7.
28. Péloquin L, Gauthier P, Bravo G, Lacombe G, Billiard JS. Reliability and validity of the five-minute walking field test for estimating VO2 peak in elderly subjects with knee osteoarthritis. J Aging Phys Act 1998;6:36-44.
29. Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ et al. The 6-minute walk: A new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. J Can Med Assoc 1985;132: 919.
30. Parent E, Moffet H. Comparative responsiveness of locomotor tests and questionnaires used to follow early recovery after total knee replacement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:70-80.
31. Bassey EJ, Dallosso HM, Fentem PH, Irving JM, Patrick JM. Validation of a simple mechanical accelerometer (pedometer) for the estimation of walking activity. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1987;56:323-30.
32. Silva M, Shepherd EF, Jackson WO, Dorey FJ, Schmalzried TP. Average patient walking activity approaches 2 million cycles per year. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:693-7.
33. Falconer J, Hayes KW. A simple method to measure gait for use in arthritis clinical research. Arthritis Care Res 1991;4:52-7.
34. Aminian K, Rezakhanlou K, De Andres E, Fritsch C, Leyvraz PF, Robert P. Temporal feature estimation during walking using miniature accelerometers: An analysis of gait improvement after hip arthroplasty. Med Biol Eng Comput 1999;37:686-91.
35. Auvinet B, Chaleil D, Barrey E. Accelerometric gait analysis for use in hospital outpatients. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1999;66:389-97.
36. Fransen M, Crosbie J, Edmonds J. Reliability of gait measurements in people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Phys Ther 1997;77:944-53.
37. Lafuente R, Belda JM, Sanchez-Lacuesta J, Soler C, Poveda R, Prat J. Quantitative assessment of gait deviation: Contribution to the objective measurement of disability. Gait Posture 2000;11:191-8.
38. Olsson E, Barck A. Correlation between clinical examination and quantitative gait analysis in patients operated upon with the Gunston-Hult knee prosthesis. Scand J Rehabil Med 1986;18:101-6.
39. Mathias S, Nayak USL, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: The 'Get-up and Go' test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:387-9.
40. Madsen OR, Brot C. Assessment of extensor and flexor strength in the individual gonarthrotic patient: Interpretation of performance changes. Clin Rheumatol 1996;15:154-60.
41. Marks R. Pilot study of the reproducibility of measures of walking performance variables in persons with osteoarthritis of the knee. Physiother Can 1995;47:40-4.
42. McCarthy CJ, Oldham JA. The reliability, validity and responsiveness of an aggregated locomotor function (ALF) score in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology 2004;43:514-17.
43. Lin YC, Davey RC, Cochrane T. Tests for physical function of the elderly with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2001;11:280-6.
44. Shields RK, Enloe LJ, Evans RE, Smith KB, Steckel SD. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of functional tests in patients with total joint replacement. Phys Ther 1995;75:169-76 (discussion 76-9).
45. Steultjens MPM, Roorda LD, Dekker J, Bijlsma JWJ. Responsiveness of observational and self-report methods for assessing disability in mobility in patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 2001; 45:56-61.
46. Nilsdotter AK, Roos EM, Westerlund JP, Roos HP, Lohmander LS. Comparative responsiveness of measures of pain and function after total hip replacement. Arthritis Care Res 2001;45:258-62.
47. Oberg U, Oberg B, Oberg T. Validity and reliability of a new assessment of lower-extremity dysfunction. Phys Ther 1994; 74:861-71.
48. Walker DJ, Heslop PS, Plummer CJ, Essex T, Chandler S. A continuous patient activity monitor: Validation and relation to disability. Physiol Meas 1997;18:49-59.
49. Walker DJ, Kidd E, Heslop PS, Chandler C. Spontaneous ambulatory activity as a quantifiable outcome measure for rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 1999;38:1234-8.
50. Walker DJ, Heslop PS, Chandler C, Pinder IM. Measured ambulation and self-reported health status following total joint replacement for the osteoarthritic knee. Rheumatology 2002;41:755-8.
51. van den Dikkenberg N, Meijer OG, van der Slikke RMA et al. Measuring quality of movement in patients with knee problems: Rationale and construction of the DynaPort KneeTest. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2002;10:204-12.