Monitoring in Osteoarthritis

Evidence-based Medical Monitoring: From Principles to Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 335-356

  Peat, George ^a   Porcheret, Mark ^a   Bedson, John ^a   Ward, Alison M ^b  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clinical value; Joint movement; Osteoarthritis; Pain severity; Subchondral bone

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885020517     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470696323.ch24     Document Type: Chapter

References (87)

1. Arthritis Research Campaign. Arthritis: the big picture. 1. Statistics from the ARC Epidemiology Unit, 2002. Available from http://www.arc.org.uk/about arth/bigpic.htm (last accessed 18 September 2006).
2. Hootman JM, Helmick CG, Schappert SM. Magnitude and characteristics of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions on ambulatory medical care visits, United States, 1997. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 47: 571-81.
3. Health Canada. Arthritis in Canada. An Ongoing Challenge. Ottawa: Health Canada, 2003. Available from http: //www.acreu.ca/pdf/Arthritis in Canada.pdf (last accessed 26 July 2006).
4. Jordan K, Clarke AM, Symmons DPM, et al. Measuring disease prevalence: a comparison of musculoskeletal disease using four general practice consultation databases. Br J Gen Pract 2007; 57: 7-14.
5. Westert GP, Schellevis FG, de Bakker DH, Groenewegen PP, Bensing JM, van der Zee J. Monitoring health inequalities through general practice: The Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. Eur J Public Health 2005; 15: 59-65.
6. Jinks C, Jordan K, Ong N, Croft P. A brief screening tool for knee pain in primary care (KNEST). 2. Results from a survey in the general population aged 50 and over. Rheumatology 2004; 43: 55-61.
7. Perruccio AV, Power JD, Badley EM. Revisiting arthritis prevalence projections-it's more than just the aging of the population. J Rheumatol 2006; 33: 1856-62.
8. World Health Organization. The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millennium. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. WHO Technical Report Series No. 919. Geneva: WHO, 2003. Available from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHOTRS919.pdf (last accessed 26 July 2006).
9. Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA, Hirsch R, Helmick CG. Osteoarthritis: the disease and its prevalence and impact. In: Felson DT (conference chair), Osteoarthritis: New Insights. Part 1: The Disease and Its Risk Factors. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133: 635-6.
10. Croft P. Diagnosing regional pain: the view from primary care. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 1999; 13: 231-42.
11. Prodigy. Guidance. Osteoarthritis, 2005. Available from http://www.prodigy.nhs.uk/osteoarthritis (last accessed 12 September 2006).
12. Peat G, Thomas E, Duncan R, Wood L, Hay E, Croft P. Clinical classification criteria for knee osteoarthritis: performance in the general population and primary care. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 1363-7.
13. Jordan KM, Arden NK, Doherty M, et al.; Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials ESCISIT. EULAR Recommendations 2003. An evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis. Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2003; 62: 1145-55.
14. ZhangW, Doherty M, Arden N, et al.; EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 669-81.
15. Porcheret M, Jordan K, Croft P; Primary Care Rheumatology Society. Treatment of knee pain in older adults in primary care: development of an evidence-based model of care. Rheumatol (Oxford) 2007; 46: 638-48.
16. Dieppe PA, Lohmander LS. Pathogenesis and management of pain in osteoarthritis. Lancet 2005; 365: 965-73.
17. Keefe FJ, Smith SJ, Buffington AL, Gibson J, Studts JL, Caldwell DS. Recent advances and future directions in the biopsychosocial assessment and treatment of arthritis. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002; 70: 640-55.
18. Stang PE, Brandenburg NA, Lane MC, Merikangas KR, von Korff MR, Kessler RC. Mental and physical comorbid conditions and days in role among persons with arthritis. Psychosom Med 2006; 68: 152-8.
19. De Vlieger P, Bussche EV, Eccleston C, Crombez G. Finding a solution to the problem of pain: conceptual formulation and the development of the Pain Solutions Questionnaire (PaSol). Pain 2006; 123: 285-93.
20. Von Korff M, Jensen MP, Karoly P. Assessing global pain severity by self-report in clinical and health services research. Spine 2000; 25: 3140-51.
21. Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview. BMJ 1997; 31: 131-4.
22. Woolhead GM, Donovan JL, Chard JA, Dieppe PA. Who should have priority for a knee joint replacement? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002; 41: 390-4.
23. Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Allen RR, et al. Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2003; 106: 337-45.
24. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al; IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005; 113: 9-19.
25. Bellamy N, Kirwan J, Boers M, et al. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 799-802.
26. Mantyselka P, Kumpusalo E, Ahonen R, Takala J. Patients' versus general practitioners' assessments of pain intensity in primary care patients with non-cancer pain. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51: 995-7.
27. Rosemann T, Wensing M, Joest K, Backenstrass M, Mahler C, Szecsenyi J. Problems and needs for improving primary care of osteoarthritis patients: the views of patients, general practitioners and practice nurses. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 48.
28. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006; 10: 287-333.
29. Wenger NS, Shekelle PG; the ACOVE Investigators. ACOVE quality indicators. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 652-67.
30. AGS Panel on Persistent Pain in Older Persons. The management of persistent pain in older persons. JAGS 2002; 50 (Suppl 6): S205-S224.
31. Dougados M. Monitoring osteoarthritis progression and therapy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004; 12 (Suppl 1): 55-60.
32. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2: 14.
33. Ware JE, Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83.
34. Ren XS, Kazis L, Meenan RF. Short-form arthritis impact measurement scales. 2: Tests of reliability and validity among patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1999; 12: 163-71.
35. Nelson E,Wasson J, Kirk J, et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40 (Suppl 1): 55S-69S.
36. Mendoza T, Mayne T, Rublee D, Cleeland C. Reliability and validity of a modified Brief Pain Inventory short form in patients with osteoarthritis. Eur J Pain 2006; 10: 353-61.
37. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992; 50: 133-49.
38. Bellamy N. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. A User's Guide. Ontario: London Health Services Centre, McMaster University, 1996.
39. Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)-validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 10.
40. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28: 88-96.
41. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996; 78: 185-90.
42. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perception of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 63-9.
43. Bellamy N, Campbell J, Haraoui B, et al. Dimensionality and clinical importance of pain and disability in hand osteoarthritis: development of the Australian/Canadian (AUSCAN) Osteoarthritis Hand Index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002; 10: 855-62.
44. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 602-8.
45. Sun Y, Sturmer T, Gunther KP, Brenner H. Reliability and validity of clinical outcome measurements of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee-a review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol 1997; 16: 185-98.
46. Ortiz Z, Shea B, Garcia Dieguez M, et al. The responsiveness of generic quality of life instruments in rheumatic diseases. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 210-6.
47. Garratt AM, Brealey S, Gillespie WJ, DAMASK Trial Team. Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review. Rheumatol (Oxford) 2004; 43: 1414-23.
48. Dziedzic KS, Thomas E, Hay EM. A systematic search and critical review of measures of disability for use in a population survey of hand osteoarthritis (osteoarthritis). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005; 13: 1-12.
49. OMERACT 5. International Consensus Conference on Outcome Measures in Rheumatology, Toulouse, France, 4-8 May 2000. J Rheumatol 2001; 28 (2): 394.
50. OMERACT 6. International Consensus Conference on Outcome Measures in Rheumatology, Gold Coast, Australia, 11-14 April 2002. J Rheumatol 2003; 30 (5): 1101.
51. IMMPACT-IV, 11-12 June 2004, Washington, DC. http://www.immpact.org/meetings.html (last accessed 17 May 2007).
52. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, et al. Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCIDWorking Group. Outcome measures in rheumatology. Minimal clinically important difference. J Rheumatol 2001; 28 (2): 400-5.
53. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Michel BA, Stucki G. Minimal clinically important rehabilitation effects in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 131-8.
54. Farrar JT, Young JP, Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94: 149-58.
55. Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, GrassiW. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain 2004; 8: 283-91.
56. Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, et al. Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 34-7.
57. Tubach F, Ravaud P, Baron G, et al. Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 29-33.
58. Tubach F, Dougados M, Falissard B, Baron G, Logeart I, Ravaud P. Feeling good rather than feeling better matters more to patients. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 55: 526-30.
59. Palos GR, Mendoza TR, Mobley GM, Cantor SB, Cleeland CS. Asking the community about cutpoints used to describe mild, moderate, and severe pain. J Pain 2006; 7: 49-56.
60. Peat G, Thomas E, Croft P. Staging joint pain and disability: a brief method using persistence and global severity. Arthritis Care Res 2006; 55: 411-9.
61. Wright JG. Evaluating the outcome of treatment: shouldn't we asking patients if they are better? J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 549-53.
62. Tubach F,Wells GA, Ravaud P, Dougados M. Minimal clinically important difference, low disease activity state, and patient acceptable symptom state: methodological issues. J Rheumatol 2005; 32: 2025-9.
63. Hays RD, Woolley JM. The concept of clinically meaningful difference in healthrelated quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it? Pharmacoeconomics 2000; 18: 419-23.
64. Ganz DA, Chang JT, Roth CP, et al. Quality of osteoarthritis care for communitydwelling older adults. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 55: 241-7.
65. Greenhalgh J, Meadows K. The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of care: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract 1999; 5: 401-16.
66. Huas D, Pouchain D, Gay B, Avouac B, Bouvenot G; The French College Of Teachers In General Practice. Assessing chronic pain in general practice: are guidelines relevant? A cluster randomized controlled trial. Eur J Gen Pract 2006; 12: 52-7.
67. Bellamy N, Carr A, Dougados M, Shea B,Wells G. Towards a definition of 'difference' in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 427-30.
68. Nikles CJ, Yelland M, Glasziou PP, Del Mar C. Do individualized medication effectiveness tests (n-of-1 trials) change clinical decisions about which drugs to use for osteoarthritis and chronic pain? Am J Ther 2005; 12: 92-7.
69. Peat G, Thomas E, Handy J, et al. The Knee Clinical Assessment Study-CAS(K). A prospective study of knee pain and knee osteoarthritis in the general population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004; 5: 4.
70. Jordan K, Jinks C, Croft P. A prospective study of the consulting behaviour of older people with knee pain. Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56: 269-76.
71. Hay EM, Foster NE, Peat G, et al. Pragmatic randomised clinical trial of the effectiveness of community physiotherapy and enhanced pharmacy review for knee pain in older people presenting to primary care. BMJ 2006; 333: 995-1003.
72. Rockhill B, Kawachi I, Colditz GA. Individual risk prediction and population-wide disease prevention. Epidemiol Rev 2000; 22: 176-80.
73. Lin EH, Katon W, Von Korff M, et al.; IMPACT Investigators. Effect of improving depression care on pain and functional outcomes among older adults with arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 290: 2428-9.
74. Dieppe P, Brandt KD. What is important in treating osteoarthritis? Whom should we treat and how should we treat them? Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2003; 29: 687-716.
75. Bertakis KD, Azari R, Callahan EJ. Patient pain in primary care: factors that influence physician diagnosis. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2: 224-30.
76. Tait RC, Chibnall JT. Physician judgments of chronic pain patients. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1199-205.
77. Suarez-Almazor ME, Conner-Spady B, Kendall CJ, Russell AS, Skeith K. Lack of congruence in the ratings of patients' health status by patients and physicians. Med Decis Making 2001; 21: 113-21.
78. Marquie L, Raufaste E, Lauque D, Marine C, Ecoiffier M, Sorum P. Pain rating by patients and physicians: evidence of systematic pain miscalibration. Pain 2003; 102: 289-96.
79. Kappesser J, Williams AC, Prkachin KM. Testing two accounts of pain underestimation. Pain 2006; 124: 109-16.
80. Panda M, Staton LJ, Chen I, et al. The influence of discordance in pain assessment on the functional status of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Am J Med Sci 2006; 332: 18-23.
81. Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 869-79.
82. Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, Wyrwich KW, Norman GR; The Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc 2002; 77: 371-83.
83. Haynes RB, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH. Physicians' and patients' choices in evidence based practice. BMJ 2002; 342: 1350.
84. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine. How to Practice and Teach EBM. London: Elsevier, 2005.
85. Sprangers MAG, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 1507-15.
86. Rapkin BD, Schwartz CE. Towards a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2: 14.
87. Aaron LA, Turner JA, Mancl L, Brister H, Sawchuk CN. Electronic diary assessment of pain-related variables: is reactivity a problem? J Pain 2005; 6: 107-15.