Relationship between self-reported and performance-based tests in a hip and knee joint replacement population

Clinical Rheumatology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 253-257

  Gandhi, Rajiv ^a,b   Tsvetkov, Dmitry ^a   Davey, J Roderick ^a   Syed, Khalid A ^a   Mahomed, Nizar N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^b TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Outcome assessment; Timed up and gotest; Total hip arthroplasty; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY SEVERITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; SHORT FORM 36; TIMED UP AND GO TEST; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITY OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELF-EXAMINATION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 59749099393     PISSN: 07703198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-008-1021-y     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ethgen O, Bruyère O, Richy F et al (2004) Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86(5):963-974
2. Räsänen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H et al (2007) Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthop 78(1):108-115
3. Dixon T, Shaw M, Ebrahim S et al (2004) Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: Socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need. Ann Rheum Dis 63(7):825-830
4. Holtzman J, Saleh K, Kane R (2002) Effect of Baseline Functional status and pain on outcomes of total hip. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84(11):1942-1948
5. Ostendorf M, Buskens E, van Stel H (2004) Waiting for total hip arthroplasty: Avoidable loss in quality time and preventable deterioration. J Arthroplast 19(3):302-309
6. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright EA et al (2004) Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86(10):2179-2186
7. Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L et al (1999) Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: Preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 42:1722-1728
8. Fortin PR, Penrod JR, Clarke AE et al (2002) Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum 46:3327-3330
9. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH et al (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 15:1833-1840
10. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473-483
11. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed "up & go": A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:142-148
12. Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ et al (1985) The 6-minute walk: A new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J 132:919-923
13. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ et al (2001) Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Jt Surg Am 83-A(12):1856-1864
14. Bombardier C, Melfi CA, Paul J et al (1995) Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med Care 33(4 Suppl):AS131-AS144
15. Kosinski M, Keller SD, Hatoum HT et al (1999) The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliability. Med Care 37(5 Suppl):MS10-MS22
16. Brazier JE, Harper R, Munro J et al (1999) Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford) 38:870-877
17. Bischoff HA, Stahelin HB, Monsch AU et al (2003) Identifying a cut-off point for normal mobility: A comparison of the timed 'up and go' test in community-dwelling and institutionalised elderly women. Age Ageing 32:315-320
18. Angel R, Ostir GV, Frisco ML et al (2000) Comparison of a self-reported and a performance-based assessment of mobility in the hispanic established population for epidemiological studies of the elderly. Res Aging 22:715-737
19. Kennedy D, Stratford PW, Pagura SM et al (2002) Comparison of gender and group differences in self-report and physical performance measures in total hip and knee arthroplasty candidates. J Arthroplast 17:70-77
20. Parent E, Moffet H (2002) Comparative responsiveness of locomotor tests and questionnaires used to follow early recovery after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:70-80
21. Cress ME, Schechtman KB, Mulrow CD et al (1995) Relationship between physical performance and self-perceived physical function. J Am Geriatr Soc 43:93-101
22. Finch E, Walsh M, Thomas SG et al (1998) Functional ability perceived by individuals following total knee arthroplasty compared to age-matched individuals without knee disability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 27:255-263
23. Boardman DL, Dorey F, Thomas BJ et al (2000) The accuracy of assessing total hip arthroplasty outcomes: A prospective correlation study of walking ability and 2 validated measurement devices. J Arthroplast 15:200-204
24. Mahomed NN, Davis A, Hawker G et al (2008) Inpatient compared with home-based rehabilitation following primary unilateral total hip or knee replacement: A randomized controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90:1673-1680
25. Linn BS, Linn MW, Gurel L (1968) Cumulative illness rating scale. J Am Geriatr Soc 16:622-626
26. Miller MD, Paradis CF, Houck PR et al (1992) Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: Application of the cumulative illness rating scale. Psychiatry Res 41:237-248
27. Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M (2000) Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed up and go test. Phys Ther 80:896-903
28. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
29. Hoeymans N, Wouters ER, Feskens EJ et al (1997) Reproducibility of performance-based and self-reported measures of functional status. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 52:M363-M368
30. Watson D, Pennebaker JW (1989) Health complaints, stress and distress: exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychol Rev 96:234-254
31. Myers AM, Holliday PJ, Harvey KA et al (1993) Functional performance measures: Are they superior to self-assessments? J Gerontol 48:M196-M206
32. Sager MA, Dunham NC, Schwantes A et al (1992) Measurement of activities of daily living in hospitalized elderly: A comparison of self-report and performance-based methods. J Am Geriatr Soc 40:457-462
33. Kennedy DM, Hanna SE, Stratford PW et al (2006) Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 21:559-66
34. Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Hanna SE et al (2006) Modeling early recovery of physical function following hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11(7):100