Can the oxford scores be used to monitor symptomatic progression of patients awaiting knee or hip arthroplasty?

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1454-1458

  Naylor, Justine M ^a,c   Kamalasena, Gihan ^a,c   Hayen, Andrew ^b   Harris, Ian A ^a,c   Adie, Sam ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c LIVERPOOL HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Osteoarthritis; Oxford hip score; Oxford knee score; Patient reported outcome measures; Psychometrics

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OXFORD HIP SCORE; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PATIENT MONITORING; PREOPERATIVE CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SYMPTOM; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ARTHROPLASTY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OXFORD HIP SCORE; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; PSYCHOMETRICS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; TIME FACTORS; WAITING LISTS;

EID: 84885021824     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hurst J, Siciliani L. Tackling excessive waiting times for elective surgery: a comparison of policies in twelve OECD countries. OECD Health Working Papers, Organization for Economics Cooperation and Development, 2003, available at. Last accessed December 6th 2012. http://www.oecd.org/health/healthpoliciesanddata/5162353.pdf.
2. Curtis A.J., Russell C.O.H., Stoelwinder J.U., et al. Waiting lists and elective surgery: ordering the queue. MJA 2010, 192:217.
3. Waiting time and elective surgery policy. PD2012_011. Last accessed December 3rd 2012. http://www0.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/pd/2012/PD2012_011.html.
4. Murray D.W., Fitzpatrick R., Rogers K., et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89-B:1010.
5. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Murray D., et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80-B:63.
6. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Carr A., et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996, 78-B:185.
7. Williamson L., Wyatt M.R., Yein K., et al. Severe knee osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial of acupuncture, physiotherapy (supervised exercise) and standard management for patients awaiting knee replacement. Rheumatology 2007, 46:1445.
8. Clarke S., Lock V., Duddy J., et al. Intra-articular hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc) in the management of patellofemoral osteoarthritis of the knee (POAK). Knee 2005, 12:57.
9. Collins N.J., Misra D., Felson D.T., et al. Measures of knee function. Arthritis Care Res 2011, 63(S11):S208.
10. Ostendorf M., van Stel H.F., Buskens E., et al. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement: a comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86-B:801.
11. Thorborg K., Roos E.M., Bartels E.M., et al. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported outcome questionnaires when assessing hip and groin disability: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2010, 44:1186.
12. Alviar M.J., Olver J., Brand C., et al. Do patient-reported outcome measures in hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation have robust measurement attributes? A systematic review. J Rehabil Med 2011, 43:572.
13. Garratt A.M., Brealey S., Gillespie W.J. Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review. Rheumatology 2004, 43:1414. in collaboration with the DAMASK Trial Team.
14. Bellamy N., Sothern R.B., Campbell J. Rhythmic variations in pain perception in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol 1990, 17:364.
15. Hutchings A., Calloway M., Choy E., et al. The Longitudinal Examination of Arthritis Pain (LEAP) Study: relationships between weekly fluctuations in patient-rated joint pain and other health outcomes. J Rheumatol 2007, 34:2291.
16. Allen K.D., Golightly Y.M., Olsen M.K. Pilot study of pain and coping among patients with osteoarthritis. A daily diary analysis. J Clin Rheumatol 2006, 12:118.
17. Terwee C.B., Bot S.D.M., de Boer M.R., et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clinl Epidemiol 2007, 60:34.
18. Allen K.D. The value of measuring variability in osteoarthritis pain. J Rheumatol 2007, 34:2132.
19. Stone A.A., Broderick J.E., Kaell A.T., et al. Does the peak-end phenomenon observed in laboratory pain studies apply to real-world pain in rheumatoid arthritics?. J Pain 2000, 1:212.
20. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 1(8476):307.
21. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999, 8:135.
22. Altman D.G. Practical statistics for medical research 1991, Chapman & Hall, London.
23. Giraudeau B., Mary J.Y. Planning a reproducibility study: how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Stat Med 2001, 20:3205.
24. Bland J.M., Altman G.M. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Compur Rio/ Med 1990, 20(S):337.
25. Fitzpatrick R., Davey C., Buxton M.J., et al. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998, 2(14).
26. Nunnally J.C., Bernstein I.H. Psychometric theory 1994, McGraw-Hill, New York. 3rd ed.
27. Terwee C.B., Roorda L.D., Knol D.L., et al. Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2009, 62:1062.
28. Ornetti P., Parratte S., Gossec L., et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) in hip osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010, 18:522.
29. Roos E.M., Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003, 1:17.
30. Impellizzeri F.M., Mannion A.F., Leunig M., et al. Comparison of the reliability, responsiveness, and construct validity of 4 different questionnaires for evaluating outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26:861.
31. Peat G., Porcheret M., Bedson J., et al. Monitoring in osteoarthritis. Evidence-based medical monitoring: from principles to practice 2008, 335. Blackwell Publishing, UK. P. Glasziou, J. Aronson, L. Irwig (Eds.).