How advanced change patterns impact the process of process modeling

Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Volumn 175 LNBIP, Issue , 2014, Pages 17-32

  Weber, Barbara ^a   Zeitelhofer, Sarah ^a   Pinggera, Jakob ^a   Torres, Victoria ^b   Reichert, Manfred ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Change patterns; Controlled experiment; Problem solving; Process model quality; Process of process modeling

Indexed keywords

PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCESS ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

CHANGE PATTERNS; CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; CORRECTNESS BY CONSTRUCTION; MENTAL EFFORT; POTENTIAL BENEFITS; PROCESS MODEL QUALITIES; PROCESS MODELING; RESEARCH EFFORTS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84904567532     PISSN: 18651348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-43745-2_2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Becker, J., Rosemann, M., von Uthmann, C.: Guidelines of Business Process Modeling. In: van der Aalst, W. M. P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 30-49. Springer, Heidelberg (2000).
2. Kock, N., Verville, J., Danesh-Pajou, A., DeLuca, D.: Communication flow orientation in business process modeling and its effect on redesign success: Results from a field study. Decision Support Systems 46, 562-575 (2009).
3. Mendling, J., Verbeek, H. M. W., van Dongen, B. F., van der Aalst, W. M. P., Neumann, G.: Detection and prediction of errors in EPCs of the SAP reference model. Data and Knowledge Engineering 64, 312-329 (2008).
4. Weber, B., Reichert, M., Rinderle, S.: Change Patterns and Change Support Features-Enhancing Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems. Data and Knowledge Engineering 66, 438-466 (2008).
5. Casati, F.: Models, Semantics, and Formal Methods for the design of Workflows and their Exceptions. PhD thesis, Milano (1998).
6. Pinggera, J., Zugal, S., Weidlich, M., Fahland, D., Weber, B., Mendling, J., Reijers, H. A.: Tracing the Process of Process Modeling with Modeling Phase Diagrams. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part I. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 370-382. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).
7. Claes, J., et al.: Tying Process Model Quality to the Modeling Process: The Impact of Structuring, Movement, and Speed. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7481, pp. 33-48. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).
8. Pinggera, J., Soffer, P., Fahland, D., Weidlich, M., Zugal, S., Weber, B., Reijers, H., Mendling, J.: Styles in business process modeling: An exploration and a model. Software & Systems Modeling, 1-26 (2013).
9. Weber, B., Pinggera, J., Torres, V., Reichert, M.: Change Patterns in Use: A Critical Evaluation. In: Nurcan, S., Proper, H. A., Soffer, P., Krogstie, J., Schmidt, R., Halpin, T., Bider, I. (eds.) BPMDS 2013 and EMMSAD 2013. LNBIP, vol. 147, pp. 261-276. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
10. Pinggera, J., Zugal, S., Weber, B.: Investigating the Process of Process Modeling with Cheetah Experimental Platform. In: Proc. ER-POIS 2010, pp. 13-18 (2010).
11. Rinderle-Ma, S., Reichert, M., Weber, B.: On the formal semantics of change patterns in process-aware information systems. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 279-293. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).
12. Dadam, P., Reichert, M.: The ADEPT project: A decade of research and development for robust and flexible process support. Comp. Scie.-R&D 23, 81-97 (2009).
13. Fahland, D., Woith, H.: Towards process models for disaster response. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds.) BPM 2008Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 17, pp. 254-265. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).
14. Pinggera, J., Zugal, S., Weber, B., Fahland, D., Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H. A.: How the Structuring of Domain Knowledge Can Help Casual Process Modelers. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 445-451. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).
15. Höst, M., Regnell, B., Wohlin, C.: Using students as subjects-a comparative study of students and professionals in lead-time impact assessment. Empirical Software Engineering 5, 201-214 (2000).
16. Porter, A. A., Votta, L. G.: Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspections: A replication using professional subjects. Empirical Software Engineering 3, 355-379 (1998).
17. Runeson, P.: Using students as experiment subjects-an analysis on graduate and freshmen student data. In: Proc. EASE 2003, pp. 95-102 (2003).
18. Davis, F.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319-340 (1989).
19. Mendling, J., Reijers, H. A., Cardoso, J.: What Makes Process Models Understandable? In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 48-63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).
20. Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., Licata, L.: Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49, 764-766 (2013).
21. Frederiks, P., Weide, T.: Information modeling: The process and the required competencies of its participants. Data and Knowledge Engineering 58, 4-20 (2006).
22. Hoppenbrouwers, S. J. B. A., Proper, H. A(E.), van der Weide, T. P.: A fundamental view on the process of conceptual modeling. In: Delcambre, L. M. L., Kop, C., Mayr, H. C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol. 3716, pp. 128-143. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).
23. Rittgen, P.: Negotiating Models. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A. L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 561-573. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).
24. Stirna, J., Persson, A., Sandkuhl, K.: Participative Enterprise Modeling: Experiences and Recommendations. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A. L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 546-560. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).
25. Claes, J., Vanderfeesten, I., Pinggera, J., Reijers, H. A., Weber, B., Poels, G.: Visualizing the Process of Process Modeling with PPMCharts. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPMWorkshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 744-755. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
26. Pinggera, J., Furtner, M., Martini, M., Sachse, P., Reiter, K., Zugal, S., Weber, B.: Investigating the Process of Process Modeling with Eye Movement Analysis. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 438-450. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).
27. Gschwind, T., Koehler, J., Wong, J.: Applying patterns during business process modeling. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 4-19. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).