Negotiating models

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4495 LNCS, Issue , 2007, Pages 561-573

  Rittgen, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BORÅS   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEMANTICS;

MODELING SESSIONS; PRAGMATIC LEVELS;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 38149103156     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72988-4_39     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. AMICE: CIMOSA: Open System Architecture for CIM, 2nd revised and extended version. Springer, Berlin (1993)
2. Barker, R.: CASE*Method: Entity-Relationship Modelling. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham (1990)
3. Bemus, P., Nemes, L.: A Framework to Define a Generic Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 9, 179-191 (1996)
4. Goldkuhl, G., Röstlinger, A.: Joint elicitation of problems: An important aspect of change analysis. In: Avison, D.E., Kendall, J.E., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Human, organizational and social dimensions of Information systems development. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 107-125 (1993)
5. Menzel, C., Mayer, R.J.: The IDEF Family of Languages. In: Bernus, P., Mertins, K., Schmidt, G. (eds.) Handbook on Architectures for Information Systems, pp. 209-241. Springer, Berlin (1998)
6. Ould, M.: Business Process Management: A Rigorous Approach. Meghan-Kiffer Press, Tampa, FL (2005)
7. Roboam, M., Zanettin, M., Pun, L.: GRAI-IDEF0-Merise (GIM): integrated methodology to analyse and design manufacturing systems. Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Systems 2, 82-98 (1989)
8. Scheer, A.-W.: ARIS - Business Process Modeling. Springer, Berlin (1999)
9. Williams, T.J.: The Purdue enterprise reference architecture. Computers in Industry 24, 141-158 (1994)
10. Bennet, S., McRobb, S., Farmer, R.: Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Design. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead (1999)
11. Introna, L.D., Whitley, E.A.: Against method: exploring the limits of method. Logistics Information Management 10, 235-245 (1997)
12. Morris, W.T.: On the Art of Modeling. Management Science 13, B-707-B717 (1967)
13. Srinivasan, A., Te'eni, D.: Modeling as Constrained Problem Solving: An Empirical Study of the Data Modeling Process. Management Science 41, 419-434 (1995)
14. Willemain, T.R.: Insights on Modeling from a Dozen Experts. Operations Research 42, 213-222 (1994)
15. Willemain, T.R.: Model Formulation: What Experts Think about and When. Operations Research 43, 916-932 (1995)
16. Bommel, P., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A.E., Weide, T.P.v.d.: Exploring Modelling Strategies in a Meta-modelling Context. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops - OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters, AWESOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET, OnToContent, ORM, PerSys, OTM Academy Doctoral Consortium, RDDS, SWWS, and SebGIS, Proceedings, Part II. vol.4275, pp. 1128-1137. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2006)
17. Frederiks, P.J.M., Weide, T.P.v.d, Weide, T.P.v.d.: Information Modeling: the process and the required competencies of its participants. Data. & Knowledge Engineering 58, 4-20 (2006)
18. Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Lindeman, L., Proper, H.A.: Capturing Modeling Processes -Towards the MoDial Modeling Laboratory. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops - OTM Confederated International Workshops and Posters, AWESOMe, CAMS, COMINF, IS, KSinBIT, MIOS-CIAO, MONET, OnToContent, ORM, PerSys, OTM Academy Doctoral Consortium, RDDS, SWWS, and SebGIS, Proceedings, Part II. vol.4275, pp. 1242-1252. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2006)
19. Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Proper, H.A., Weide, T.P.: v.d.: Formal Modelling as a Grounded Conversation. In: Goldkuhl, G., Lind, M., Haraldson, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Working Conference on the Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP'05), Kiruna, Sweden. Linköpings Universitet and Högskolan i Borås, Linköping and Borås, pp. 139-155 ((2005)
20. Persson, A.: Enterprise Modelling in Practice: Situational Factors and their Influence on Adopting a Participative Approach. Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University (2001)
21. Ericsson, K., Simon, H.: Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. MIT Press, Boston (1993)
22. Stamper, R.: The Semiotic Framework for Information Systems Research. In: Nissen, H., Klein, H., Hirschheim, R. (eds.) Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 515-517 (1991)
23. Keller, F., Wendt, S.: FMC: An Approach Towards Architecture-Centric System Development. In: Keller, F., Wendt, S. (eds.) 10th IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer Based Systems, pp. 173-182. IEEE Computer Society, Pasadena, CA (2003)
24. OMG: UML 2.0 Superstructure Specification. OMG, Needham, MA (2004)
25. OMG: Unified Modeling Language: Infrastructure. OMG, Needham, MA (2006)
26. Dietz, J.L.G.: Understanding and modeling business processes with DEMO. In: Akoka, J., Bouzeghoub, M., Comyn-Wattiau, I., Métais, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling ER '99, pp. 188-202. Springer, Berlin (1999)
27. Boehm, B., Grunbacher, P., Briggs, R.O.: Developing Groupware for Requirements Negotiation: Lessons Learned. IEEE Software 18, 46-55 (2001)
28. Briggs, R.O., de Vreede, G.J., Nunamaker, J.: Collaboration Engineering with Thinklets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems. Journal of MIS 19, 31-63 (2003)
29. Conklin, J., Selvin, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Sierhuis, M.: Facilitated Hypertext for Collective Sensemaking: 15 Years on from gIBIS. In: Weigand, H., Goldkuhl, G., de Moor, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Working Conference on the Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modeling (LAP'03), Tilburg, The Netherlands (2003)
30. Aiken, M., Vanjani, M., Krosp, J.: Group decision support systems. Review of Business 16, 38-42 (1995)
31. Bamber, E.M., Watson, R.T., Hill, M.C.: The effects of group support system technology on audit group decision-making. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 15, 122-134 (1996)
32. Benbasat, I., Lim, L.H.: The effects of group, task, context, and technology variables on the usefulness of group support systems: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Small Group Research 24, 430-462 (1993)
33. Bidgoli, H.: A new productivity tool for the 90's: Group support systems. Journal of Systems Management 47, 56-62 (1996)
34. Burke, K., Chidambaram, L., Lock, J.: Evolution of relational factors over time: A study of distributed and non-distributed meetings.In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences vol. 4, pp. 14-23 ((1995)
35. Cass, K., Heintz, T.J., Kaiser, K.M.: Using a voice-synchronous GDSS in dispersed locations: A preliminary analysis of participant satisfaction. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences vol. 3, 555-563 (1991)
36. Chudoba, K.M.: Appropriations and patterns in the use of group support systems. Database for Advances in Information Systems 30, 131-148 (1999)
37. Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S.R.: An assessment of group support systems experiment research: Methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems 15, 7-149 (1998/1999)
38. Jackson, N.F., Aiken, M.W.V., Mahesh, B.H., Bassam, S.: Support group decisions via computer systems. Quality Progress 28, 75-78 (1995)
39. Townsend, A.M., Whitman, M.E., Hendrickson, A.R.: Computer support system adds power to group processes. HRMagazine 40, 87-91 (1995)