How the structuring of domain knowledge helps casual process modelers

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6412 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 445-451

  Pinggera, Jakob ^a   Zugal, Stefan ^a   Weber, Barbara ^a   Fahland, Dirk ^b   Weidlich, Matthias ^c   Mendling, Jan ^b   Reijers, Hajo A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^d EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; BUSINESS PROCESS; CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY; IN-LINE; MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS MODELING;

SPECIFICATIONS;

EID: 78649934154     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16373-9_33     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Business process modeling: Current issues and future challenges. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 501-514. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
2. Davis, A., et al.: Identifying and measuring quality in a software requirements specification. In: Proc. METRICS, pp. 141-152 (1993)
3. Frederiks, P.J.M., van der Weide, T.P.: Information Modeling: The Process and the Required Competencies of Its Participants. DKE 58, 4-20 (2006)
4. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda. ISR 13, 363-376 (2002) (Pubitemid 36039702)
5. Hoppenbrouwers, S., Proper, H., Weide, T.: A fundamental view on the process of conceptual modeling. In: Delcambre, L.M.L., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C., Mylopoulos, J., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol. 3716, pp. 128-143. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
6. DeMarco, T.: Software Pioneers. Contributions to Software Engineering (2002)
7. Lindsay, P., Norman, D.: Human Information Processing: An introduction to psychology. Academic Press, London (1977)
8. Cockburn, A.: Writing Effective Use Cases. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2000)
9. Rolland, C., Achour, C.B.: Guiding the Construction of Textual Use Case Specifications. DKE 25, 125-160 (1998) (Pubitemid 128421869)
10. Davis, A.M., et al.: Effectiveness of requirements elicitation techniques: Empirical results derived from a systematic review. In: Proc. RE, pp. 176-185 (2006)
11. Wohlin, C., et al.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: an Introduction. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)
12. Pinggera, J., Zugal, S., Weber, B.: Investigating the Process of Process Modeling with Cheetah Experimental Platform. Accepted for ER-POIS 2010 (2010)
13. Fahland, D., Woith, H.: Towards Process Models for Disaster Response. In: Proc. PM4HDPS 2008, pp. 254-265 (2008)
14. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L.: Graph Matching Algorithms for Business Process Model Similarity Search. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 48-63. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
15. Constantine, L., Lockwood, L.: Structure and style in use cases for user interface design. In: Object Modeling and User Interface Design, pp. 245-280 (2001)