Implicit motivational processes underlying smoking in American and Dutch adolescents

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Volumn 5, Issue MAY, 2014, Pages

  Larsen, Helle ^a   Kong, Grace ^b   Becker, Daniela ^a   Cousijn, Janna ^a   Boendermaker, Wouter ^a   Cavallo, Dana ^b   Krishnan Sarin, Suchitra ^b   Wiers, Reinout ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Cognitive biases; Inhibition; Risk taking; Smoking; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; COGNITIVE BIAS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MOTIVATION; NERVE STIMULATION; NETHERLANDS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RISK FACTOR; SMOKING HABIT; STROOP TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE; UNITED STATES; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 84904510461     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16640640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00051     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Creemers HE, Korhonen T, Kaprio J, Vollebergh WA, Ormel J, Verhulst FC, et al. The role of temperament in the relationship between early onset of tobacco and cannabis use. The TRAILS study. Drug Alcohol Depend (2009) 104:113-8. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.04.010
2. Merrill JC, Kleber HD, Shwartz M, Liu H, Lewis SR. Cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, other risk behaviors, and American youth. Drug Alcohol Depend (1999) 56:205-12. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00034-4
3. National Drug Monitor (2009). Utrecht: Trimbos Institute, The Netherlands.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth risk behavior surveillance-United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2012) 2012:61.
5. Bechara A. Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nat Neurosci (2005) 8:1458-63. doi:10.1038/nn1584
6. Deutsch R, Strack F. Duality models in social psychology: from dual processes to interacting systems. Psychol Inq (2006) 17:166-72. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1703_2 CrossRef Full Text
7. Wiers RW, Bartholow BD, van den Wildenberg E, Thush C, Engels RC, Sher KJ, et al. Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav (2007) 86:263-83. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2006.09.021
8. Wiers RW, Gladwin TE, Hofmann W, Salemink E, Ridderinkhof RK. Cognitive bias modification and cognitive control training in addiction and related psychopathology: mechanisms, clinical perspectives, and ways forward. Clin Psychol Sci (2013) 1:192-212. doi:10.1177/2167702612466547 CrossRef Full Text
9. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. Addiction. Annu Rev Psychol (2003) 54:25-53. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145237
10. Berridge KC, Robinson TE. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Rev (1998) 28:309-69. doi:10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00019-8
11. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev (1993) 18:247-91. doi:10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P
12. Wiers RW, Rinck M, Dictus M, van den Wildenberg E. Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes Brain Behav (2009) 8:101-6. doi:10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00454.x
13. Palfai TP, Ostafin BD. Alcohol-related motivational tendencies in hazardous drinkers: assessing implicit response tendencies using the modified-IAT. Behav Res Ther (2003) 41:1149-62. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00018-4
14. Wiers RW, van Woerden N, Smulders FTY, de Jong PJ. Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. J Abnorm Psychol (2002) 111:648-58. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.111.4.648
15. Stacy AW, Wiers RW. Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annu Rev Clin Psychol (2010) 6:551-75. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131444
16. Bradley B, Field M, Mogg K, De Houwer J. Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in nicotine dependence: component processes of biases in visual orienting. Behav Pharmacol (2004) 15:29-36. doi:10.1097/00008877-200402000-00004
17. Ehrman RN, Robbins SJ, Bromwell MA, Lankford ME, Monterosso JR, O'Brien CP. Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and nonsmokers using a dot-probe task. Drug Alcohol Depend (2002) 67:185-91. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00065-0
18. Chanon VW, Sours CR, Boettiger CA. Attentional bias towards cigarette cues in active smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) (2010) 212:309-20. doi:10.1007/s00213-010-1953-1
19. Field M, Cox WM. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend (2008) 92:1-20. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.030
20. Field M, Mogg K, Bradley BP. Alcohol increases cognitive biases for smoking cues in smokers. Psychopharmacology (2005) 180:63-72. doi:10.1007/s00213-005-2251-1
21. Mogg K, Bradley BP, Field M, De Houwer J. Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence. Addiction (2003) 98:825-36. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00392.x
22. Mogg K, Field M, Bradley BP. Attentional and approach biases for smoking cues in smokers: an investigation of competing theoretical views of addiction. Psychopharmacology (Berl) (2005) 180:333-41. doi:10.1007/s00213-005-2158-x
23. Waters AJ, Feyerabend C. Determinants and effects of attentional bias in smokers. Psychol Addict Behav (2000) 14:111-20. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.14.2.111
24. Cousijn J, Goudriaan AE, Wiers RW. Reaching out toward cannabis: approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use. Addiction (2011) 106:1667-74. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03475.x
25. Field M, Eastwood B, Bradley BP, Mogg K. Selective processing of cannabis cues in regular cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend (2006) 85:75-82. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.03.018
26. Peeters M, Wiers RW, Monschouwer K, van de Schoot R, Janssen T, Vollebergh WAM. Automatic processes in high-risk adolescents: the role of alcohol-approach tendencies and response inhibition in drinking behavior. Addiction (2012) 107:1939-46. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03948.x
27. Peeters M, Monshouwer K, van de Schoot RA, Janssen T, Vollebergh WA, Wiers RW. Automatic processes and the drinking behavior in early adolescents: a prospective study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (2013) 37:1737-44. doi:10.1111/acer.12156
28. Field M, Kiernan A, Eastwood B, Child R. Rapid approach responses to alcohol cues in heavy drinkers. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry (2008) 39:209-18. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.06.001
29. Bradley B, Field M, Healy H, Mogg K. Do the affective properties of smoking-related cues influence attentional and approach biases in cigarette smokers? J Psychopharmacol (2008) 22:737-45. doi:10.1177/0269881107083844
30. Watson P, de Wit S, Cousijn J, Hommel B, Wiers RW. Motivational mechanisms underlying the approach bias to cigarettes. J Exp Psychopathol (2013) 4:250-62. doi:10.5127/jep.030512 CrossRef Full Text
31. Wiers CE, Kühn S, Javadi AH, Korucuoglu O, Wiers RW, Walter H, et al. Automatic approach bias towards smoking cues is present in smokers but not in ex-smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) (2013) 229:187-97. doi:10.1007/s00213-013-3098-5
32. Huijding JT, de Jong PJ. Automatic associations with the sensory aspects of smoking: positive in habitual smokers but negative in non-smokers. Addict Behav (2006) 31:182-6. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.04.014
33. McCarthy DM, Thompsen DM. Implicit and explicit measures of alcohol and smoking cognitions. Psychol Addict Behav (2006) 20:436-44. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.20.4.436
34. Waters AJ, Carter BL, Robinson JD, Wetter DW, Lam CY, Cinciripini PM. Implicit attitudes to smoking are associated with craving and dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend (2007) 91:178-86. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.05.024
35. Huijding J, de Jong PJ, Wiers RW, Verkooijen K. Implicit and explicit attitudes toward smoking in a smoking and a non-smoking setting. Addict Behav (2005) 30:949-61. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.09.014
36. Glock S, Kovacs C, Unz D. Implicit attitudes toward smoking: how the smell of cigarettes influences responses of college-age smokers and nonsmokers. J Health Psychol (2013) 19(5):629-41. doi:10.1177/1359105313476974
37. van Hemel-Ruiter ME, de Jong PJ, Oldehinkel AJ, Ostafin BD. Reward-related attentional biases and adolescent substance use: the TRAILS study. Psychol Addict Behav (2013) 27:142-50. doi:10.1037/a0028271
38. van Hemel-Ruiter ME, de Jong PJ, Wiers RW. Appetitive and regulatory processes in young adolescent drinkers. Addict Behav (2011) 36:18-26. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.08.002
39. Pieters S, Burk WJ, Van der Vorst H, Wiers RW, Engels RC. The moderating role of working memory capacity and alcohol-specific rule-setting on the relation between approach tendencies and alcohol use in young adolescents. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (2012) 36:915-22. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01688.x
40. Pieters S, Van Der Vorst H, Burk WJ, Schoenmakers TM, Van Den Wildenberg E, Smeets HJ, et al. The effect of the OPRM1 and DRD4 polymorphisms on the relation between attentional bias and alcohol use in adolescence and young adulthood. Dev Cogn Neurosci (2011) 4:591-9. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.07.008
41. Chamberlain SR, Odlaug BL, Schreiber LRN, Grant JE. Association between tobacco smoking and cognitive functioning in young adults. Am J Addict (2012) 21:14-9. doi:10.1111/j.1521-0391.2012.00290.x
42. Jacobsen LK, Krystal JH, Mencl WE, Westerveld M, Frost SJ, Pugh KR. Effects of smoking and smoking abstinence on cognition in adolescent tobacco smokers. Biol Psychiatry (2005) 57:56-66. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.022
43. Cavalca E, Kong G, Liss T, Reynolds EK, Schepsis TS, Lejuez CW, et al. A preliminary experimental investigation of peer influence on risk-taking among adolescent smokers and non-smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend (2013) 129:163-6. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.09.020
44. Lejuez CW, Aklin WM, Jones HA, Richards JB, Strong JR, Kahler CW, et al. The balloon analogue risk task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol (2003) 11:26-33. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.11.1.26
45. Krank M, Wall AM, Stewart SH, Wiers RW, Goldman MS. Context effects on alcohol cognitions. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (2005) 29:196-206. doi:10.1097/01.ALC.0000153545.36787.C8
46. Mitchell JP, Nosek BA, Banaji MR. Contextual variations in implicit evaluation. J Exp Psychol Gen (2003) 132:455-69. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.455
47. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation (1996).
48. Rinck M, Becker ES. Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry (2007) 38:105-20. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.001
49. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol (1998) 74:1464-79. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
50. Sriram N, Greenwald AG. The brief implicit association test. Exp Psychol (2009) 56:283-94. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.283 CrossRef Full Text
51. Cox WM, Fadardi JS, Pothos EM. The addiction-Stroop test: theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychol Bull (2006) 132:443-76. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.443
52. Waters AJ, Sayette MA, Franken IH, Schwartz JE. Generalizability of carry-over effects in the emotional Stroop task. Behav Res Ther (2005) 43:715-32. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.003
53. Williams JM, Mathews A, Macleod C. The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychol Bull (1996) 120:3-24. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3 CrossRef Full Text
54. Houben K, Wiers RW. Response inhibition moderates the relationship between implicit associations and drinking behavior. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (2009) 33:626-33. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00877.x
55. MacLeod CM. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull (1991) 109:163-203. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163 CrossRef Full Text
56. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol (1935) 18:643-62. doi:10.1037/h0054651 CrossRef Full Text
57. Petrides M, Milner B. Deficits on subject-ordered tasks after frontal-and temporal-lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia (1982) 20:249-69. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(82)90100-2 CrossRef Full Text
58. Lejuez C, Read JP, Kahler CW, Richards JB, Ramsey SE, Stuart GL, et al. Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the balloon analogue risk task (BART). J Exp Psychol Appl (2002) 8:75-84. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75 CrossRef Full Text
59. Pleskac TJ, Wallsten TS, Wang P, Lejuez C. Development of an automatic response mode to improve the clinical utility of sequential risk-taking tasks. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol (2008) 16:555-64. doi:10.1037/a0014245
60. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The Fagerström test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerström tolerance questionnaire. Br J Addict (1991) 86:1119-27. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x
61. Eberl C, Wiers RW, Pawelczack S, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J. Approach bias modification in alcohol dependence: do clinical effects replicate and for whom does it works best? Dev Cogn Neurosci (2013) 4:38-51. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.002
62. Greenwald AG, Nosek BA, Banaji MR. Understanding and using the implicit association test: 1. An improved scoring algorithm. J Pers Soc Psychol (2003) 85:197-216. doi:10.1037/h0087889
63. Bradley BP, Mogg K, Wright T, Field M. Attentional bias in drug dependence: vigilance for cigarette-related cues in smokers. Psychol Addict Behav (2003) 17:66-72. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.17.1.66
64. Waters AJ, Shiffman S, Bradley BP, Mogg K. Attentional shifts to smoking cues in smokers. Addiction (2003) 98(10):1409-17.
65. Di Chiara G. Role of dopamine in the behavioural actions of nicotine related to addiction. Eur J Pharmacol (2000) 393:295-314.
66. Everitt BJ, Robbins TW. Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion. Nat Neurosci (2005) 8:1481-9.
67. Nagelhout GE, de Vries H, Fong GT, Candel MJ, Thrasher JF, van den Putten B, et al. Pathways of change explaining the effect of smoke-free legislation on smoking cessation in The Netherlands. An application of the international tobacco control conceptual model. Nicotine Tob Res (2012) 14:1474-82. doi:10.1093/ntr/nts081
68. Ert E, Yechiam E, Arshavsky O. Smoker's decision making: more than mere risk taking. PLoS One (2013) 8:e68064. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068064
69. Audrain-McGovern J, Rodriguez D, Tercyak KP, Epstein LH, Goldman P, Wileyto EP. Applying a behavioral economic framework to understanding adolescent smoking. Psychol Addict Behav (2004) 18:64-73. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.18.1.64
70. Krishnan-Sarin S, Reynolds B, Duhig AM, Smith A, Liss A, McFetridge A, et al. Behavioral impulsivity predicts treatment outcome in a smoking cessation program for adolescent smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend (2007) 88:79-82. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.09.006
71. Reynolds B, Karraker K, Horn K, Richards JB. Delay and probability discounting as related to different stages of adolescent smoking and nonsmoking. Behav Processes (2003) 64:333-44. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00168-2 CrossRef Full Text
72. Gladwin TE, Figner B, Crone EA, Wiers RW. Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Dev Cogn Neurosci (2011) 1:364-76. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.06.008
73. Harakeh Z, Vollebergh WAM. The impact of active and passive peer influence on young adult smoking: an experimental study. Drug Alcohol Depend (2012) 121:220-3. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.029
74. Harakeh Z, Vollebergh WAM. Young adult smoking in peer groups: an experimental observational study. Nicotine Tob Res (2013) 15:656-61. doi:10.1093/ntr/nts183