Selective processing of cannabis cues in regular cannabis users

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 75-82

  Field, Matt ^a   Eastwood, Brian ^a   Bradley, Brendan P ^b   Mogg, Karin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attentional bias; Cannabis; Craving; Dependence; Implicit approach; Marijuana

Indexed keywords

CANNABIS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANNABIS ADDICTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG USE; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; GAZE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARIJUANA ABUSE; MOTIVATION; PERIODICITY; PREVALENCE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

CANNABIS; CANNABIS SATIVA; NICOTIANA TABACUM;

EID: 33748138613     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.03.018     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bradley B.P., Field M., Mogg K., and De Houwer J. Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in nicotine dependence: component processes of biases in visual orienting. Behav. Pharmacol. 15 (2004) 29-36
2. Cox, W.M., Fadardi, J.S., Pothos, E.M. The Addiction-Stroop test: theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychol. Bull., in press
3. Dalgleish T. Performance on the emotional Stroop task in groups of anxious, expert, and control subjects: a comparison of computer and card presentation formats. Cogn. Emotion 9 (1995) 341-362
4. De Houwer J., Crombez G., Baeyens F., and Hermans D. On the generality of the affective Simon effect. Cogn. Emotion 15 (2001) 189-206
5. Dennis M., Babor T.F., Roebuck M.C., and Donaldson J. Changing the focus: the case for recognizing and treating cannabis use disorders. Addiction 97 Suppl. 1 (2002) 4-15
6. Ehrman R.N., Robbins S.J., Bromwell M.A., Lankford M.E., Monterosso J.R., and O' Brien C.P. Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task. Drug Alcohol Depend. 67 (2002) 185-191
7. Field M. Cannabis 'dependence' and attentional bias for cannabis-related words. Behav. Pharmacol. 16 (2005) 473-476
8. Field M., and Eastwood B. Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol. Psychopharmacology 183 (2005) 350-357
9. Field M., Mogg K., Zetteler J., and Bradley B.P. Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: the roles of initial orienting and maintained attention. Psychopharmacology 176 (2004) 88-93
10. Field M., Mogg K., and Bradley B.P. Eye movements to smoking-related cues: effects of nicotine deprivation. Psychopharmacology 173 (2004) 116-123
11. Field M., Mogg K., and Bradley B.P. Cognitive bias and drug craving in recreational cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 74 (2004) 105-111
12. Field M., Mogg K., and Bradley B.P. Alcohol increases cognitive biases for smoking cues in smokers. Psychopharmacology 180 (2005) 63-72
13. Field M., Mogg K., and Bradley B.P. Craving and cognitive biases for alcohol cues in social drinkers. Alcohol Alcohol. 40 (2005) 504-510
14. Franken I.H.A. Drug craving and addiction: integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 27 (2003) 563-579
15. Franken I.H.A., Kroon L.Y., Wiers R.W., and Jansen A. Selective cognitive processing of drug cues in heroin dependence. J. Psychopharmacol. 14 (2000) 395-400
16. Gross T.M., Jarvik M.E., and Rosenblatt M.R. Nicotine abstinence produces context-specific Stroop interference. Psychopharmacology 110 (1993) 333-336
17. Heishman S.J., Singleton E.G., and Liguori A. Marijuana Craving Questionnaire: development and initial validation of a self-report instrument. Addiction 96 (2001) 1023-1034
18. Hester R., Dixon V., and Garavan H. A consistent attentional bias for drug-related material in active cocaine users across word and picture versions of the emotional Stroop task. Drug Alcohol Depend. 81 (2006) 251-257
19. Inquisit 1.33 [computer software], 2002. Millisecond Software, Seattle, WA.
20. Johnsen B.H., Laberg J.C., Cox W.M., Vaksdal A., and Hugdahl K. Alcoholic subjects' attentional bias in the processing of alcohol-related words. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 8 (1994) 111-115
21. Jones B.C., Jones B.T., Blundell L., and Bruce G. Social users of alcohol and cannabis who detect substance-related changes in a change blindness paradigm report higher levels of use than those detecting substance-neutral changes. Psychopharmacology 165 (2002) 93-96
22. Jones B.T., Jones B.C., Smith H., and Copley N. A flicker paradigm for inducing change blindness reveals alcohol and cannabis information processing biases in social users. Addiction 98 (2003) 235-244
23. Lubman D.I., Peters L.A., Mogg K., Bradley B.P., and Deakin J.F.W. Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence. Psychol. Med. 30 (2000) 169-175
24. Mogg K., and Bradley B.P. A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behav. Res. Ther. 36 (1998) 809-848
25. Mogg K., Bradley B.P., Field M., and De Houwer J. Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence. Addiction 98 (2003) 825-836
26. Mogg K., Bradley B.P., Hyare H., and Lee S. Selective attention to food-related stimuli in hunger: are attentional biases specific to emotional and psychopathological states, or are they also found in normal drive states?. Behav. Res. Ther. 36 (1998) 227-237
27. Mogg K., Field M., and Bradley B.P. Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in smokers: an investigation of competing theoretical views of addiction. Psychopharmacology 180 (2005) 333-341
28. Ostafin B.D., Palfai T.P., and Wechsler C.E. The accessibility of motivational tendencies toward alcohol: approach, avoidance, and disinhibited drinking. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 11 (2003) 294-301
29. Pope H.G., Gruber A.J., and Yergelun-Todd D. The residual neuropsychological effects of cannabis: the current status of research. Drug Alcohol Depend. 38 (1995) 25-34
30. Robinson T.E., and Berridge K.C. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res. Rev. 18 (1993) 247-291
31. Robinson T.E., and Berridge K.C. The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: an incentive-sensitization view. Addiction 95 Suppl. 2 (2000) S91-S117
32. Sharma D., Albery I.P., and Cook C. Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers. Addiction 96 (2001) 285-295
33. Swift W., Copeland J., and Hall W. Choosing a diagnostic cut-off for cannabis dependence. Addiction 93 (1998) 1681-1692
34. Tanda G., and Goldberg S.R. Cannabinoids: reward, dependence, and underlying neurochemical mechanisms-a review of recent preclinical data. Psychopharmacology 169 (2003) 115-134
35. Thalheimer, W., Cook, S., 2002. How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: a simplified methodology. Retrieved March 8, 2006. from http://work-learning.com/effect_sizes.htm.
36. Townshend J.M., and Duka T. Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers. Psychopharmacology 157 (2001) 67-74
37. Waters A.J., and Feyerabend C. Determinants and effects of attentional bias in smokers. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 14 (2000) 111-120
38. Wiers R.W., de Jong P.J., Havermans R., and Jelicic M. How to change implicit drug use-related cognitions in prevention: a transdisciplinary integration of findings from experimental psychopathology, social cognition, memory, and experimental learning psychology. Subst. Use Misuse 39 (2004) 1625-1684
39. Wiers R.W., Cox W.M., Field M., Fadardi J.S., Palfai T.P., Schoenmakers T., and Stacy A.W. The search for new ways to change alcohol-related cognitions in heavy drinkers. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 30 (2006) 320-331
40. Whiteside S.P., and Lynam D.R. The five factor model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Pers. Individual Differ. 30 (2001) 669-689
41. Yeomans M.R., Javaherian S., Tovey H.M., and Stafford L.D. Attentional bias for caffeine-related stimuli in high but not moderate or non-caffeine consumers. Psychopharmacology 181 (2005) 477-485