Automatic processes and the drinking behavior in early adolescence: A prospective study

Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1737-1744

  Peeters, Margot ^a   Monshouwer, Karin ^a,b   van de Schoot, Rens A G J ^a   Janssen, Tim ^c   Vollebergh, Wilma A M ^a   Wiers, Reinout W ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Alcohol; Alcohol Approach Tendencies; Problem Drinking; Response Inhibition

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; AUTOMATIC ALCOHOL APPROACH TENDENCIES; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPULSION; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SELF REPORT; SKILL; STROOP TEST;

ADOLESCENTS; ALCOHOL; ALCOHOL-APPROACH TENDENCIES; PROBLEM DRINKING; RESPONSE INHIBITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; AGE FACTORS; ALCOHOL DRINKING; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELF REPORT; STROOP TEST;

EID: 84884984756     PISSN: 01456008     EISSN: 15300277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/acer.12156     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Blakemore SJ, Choudhury S (2006) Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47:296-312.
2. Chassin L, Presson CC, Sherman SJ, Seo DC, Macy JT (2010) Implicit and explicit attitudes predict smoking cessation: moderating effects of experienced failure to control smoking and plans to quit. Psychol Addict Behav 24:670-679.
3. Cousijn J, Goudriaan AE, Wiers RW (2011) Reaching out towards cannabis: approach bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use. Addiction 106:1667-1674.
4. Cunningham WA, Nezlek JB, Banaji MR (2004) Implicit and explicit ethnocentrism: revisiting the ideologies of prejudice. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 30:1332-1346.
5. Cunningham WA, Preacher KJ, Banaji MR (2001) Implicit attitude measures: consistency, stability and convergent validity. Psychol Sci 12:163-170.
6. De Houwer J (2003) A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes, in The Psychology of Evaluation: Affective Processes in Cognition and Emotion (Musch J, Klauer KC eds), pp 219-244. Lawerence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
7. Deutsch R, Strack F (2006) Duality models in social psychology: from dual processes to interacting systems. Psychol Inq 17:166-172.
8. Egloff B, Schmukle SC (2002) Predictive validity of an implicit association test for assessing anxiety. J Pers Soc Psychol 83:1441-1455.
9. Enders CK, Bandalos DL (2001) The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Struct Equ Model 8:430-457.
10. Engels RCME, Knibbe RA (2000) Alcohol use and intimate relationships in adolescence: when love comes to town. Addict Behav 25:435-439.
11. Engels RCME, Knibbe RA, Drop MJ (1999) Why do late adolescents drink at home? A study on psychological well-being, social integration and drinking context. Addict Res Theory 7:31-46.
12. Fazio RH, Towles-Schwen T (1999) The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes, in Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology (Chaiken S, Trope Y eds), pp 97-116. Guilford Press, New York.
13. Field M, Kiernan A, Eastwood B, Child R (2008a) Rapid approach responses to alcohol cues in heavy drinkers. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 39:209-218.
14. Field M, Schoenmakers T, Wiers RW (2008b) Cognitive processes in alcohol binges: a review and research agenda. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 1:263-279.
15. Finn PR, Sharkansky EJ, Brandt KM, Turcotte N (2000) The effects of familial risk, personality, and expectancies on alcohol use and abuse. J Abnorm Psychol 109:122-133.
16. Gladwin TE, Finger B, Crone EA, Wiers RW (2011) Addiction, adolescence and the integration of control and motivation. Dev Cogn Neurosci 1:364-376.
17. Grenard JL, Ames SL, Wiers RW, Thush C, Sussman S, Stacy AW (2008) Working memory capacity moderates the predictive effects of drug-related associations on substance use. Psychol Addict Behav 22:426-432.
18. Houben K, Nederkoorn C, Wiers RW, Jansen A (2011a) Resisting temptation: decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition. Drug Alcohol Depend 116:132-136.
19. Houben K, Wiers RW (2009) Response inhibition moderates the relationship between implicit associations and drinking behavior. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 33:626-633.
20. Houben K, Wiers RW, Jansen A (2011b) Getting a grip on drinking behavior: training working memory to reduce alcohol abuse. Psychol Sci 22:968-975.
21. Kepper A, Monshouwer K, van Dorsselear S, Vollebergh WAM (2011) Substance use by adolescents in special education and residential youth care institutions. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 20:311-319.
22. Keren G, Schul Y (2009) Two is not always better than one. Perspect Psychol Sci 4:533-550.
23. Knight JR, Shrier LA, Bravender TD, Farrell M, Vander Bilt J, Shaffer HJ (1999) A new brief screen for adolescent substance abuse. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 153:591-596.
24. Koning IM, Van den Eijnden RJ, Verdurmen JE, Engels RC, Vollebergh WA (2011) Long-term effects of a parent and student intervention on alcohol use in adolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med 40:541-547.
25. Koning IM, Vollebergh WAM, Smit F, Verdurmen JEE, Van Den Eijnden RJJM, Ter Bogt TFM, Stattin H, Engels RCME (2009) Preventing heavy alcohol use in adolescents (PAS): cluster randomized trial of a parent and student intervention offered separately and simultaneously. Addiction 104:1669-1678.
26. Krieglmeyer R, Deutsch R (2010) Comparing measures of approach-avoidance behaviour: the manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task. Cogn Emot 24:810-828.
27. Kruglanski AW, Dechesne M (2006) Are associative and propositional processes qualitatively distinct? Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen. Psychol Bull 132:736-739.
28. Little TD, Cunningham WA, Shahar G, Widaman KF (2002) To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Struct Equ Modeling 9:151-173.
29. Liu H, Powers DA (2007) Growth curve models for zero-inflated count data: an application to smoking behavior. Struct Equ Modeling 14:247-279.
30. McCarthy DM, Thompsen DM (2006) Implicit and explicit measures of alcohol and smoking cognitions. Psychol Addict Behav 20:436-444.
31. Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol 41:49-100.
32. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998 -2010) Mplus User's Guide. 6th ed. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA.
33. Newman DA (2003) Longitudinal modeling with randomly and systematically missing data: a simulation of ad hoc, maximum likelihood, and multiple imputation techniques. Organ Res Methods 6:328-362.
34. O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Johnston LD (1983) Reliability and consistency in self-reports of drug use. Subst Use Misuse 18:805-824.
35. Ostafin BD, Marlatt GA, Greenwald AG (2008) Drinking without thinking: an implicit measure of alcohol motivation predicts failure to control alcohol use. Behav Res Ther 46:1210-1219.
36. Palfai TP, Ostafin BD (2003) Alcohol-related motivational tendencies in hazardous drinkers: assessing implicit response tendencies using the modified-IAT. Behav Res Ther 41:1149-1162.
37. Peeters M, Wiers RW, Monshouwer K, van de Schoot RAJG, Janssen T, Vollebergh WAM (2012) Alcohol use in adolescence: the role of automatic processes and response inhibition. Addiction 107:1939-1946.
38. Pieters S, Burk WJ, Van der Vorst H, Wiers RW, Engels RCME (2012) The moderating role of working memory capacity and alcohol specific rule setting on the relation between approach tendencies and alcohol use in young adolescents. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 36:915-922.
39. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 18:247-291.
40. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (2003) Addiction. Annu Rev Psychol 54:25-53.
41. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (2008) The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:3137-3146.
42. Rooke SE, Hine DW, Thorsteinsson EB (2008) Implicit cognition and substance use: a meta-analysis. Addict Behav 33:1314-1328.
43. Salemink E, Wiers RW (2011) Adolescent threat-related interpretive bias and its modification: the moderating role of regulatory control. Behav Res Ther 50:40-46.
44. Sher KJ, Bartholow BD, Wood MD (2000) Personality and substance use disorders: a prospective study. J Consult Clin Psychol 68:818-829.
45. Strack F, Deutsch R (2004) Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 8:220-247.
46. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18:643-662.
47. Thush C, Wiers RW (2007) Explicit and implicit alcohol-related cognitions and the prediction of future drinking in adolescents. Addict Behav 32:1367-1383.
48. Thush C, Wiers RW, Ames SL, Grenard JL, Sussman S, Stacy AW (2008) Interactions between inplicit and explicit cognition and working memory capacity in the prediction of alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend 94:116-124.
49. Valdes KA (1990) Youth Categorized as Emotionally Disturbed, Statistical Almanac, Volume 3. The National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. SRI International, Menlo Park, CA.
50. Wiers RW, Beckers L, Houben K, Hofmann W (2009a) A short fuse after alcohol: implicit power associations predict aggressiveness after alcohol consumption in young heavy drinkers with limited executive control. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 93:300-305.
51. Wiers RW, Eberl C, Rinck M, Becker ES, Lindenmeyer J (2011) Retraining automatic action tendencies changes alcoholic patients' approach bias for alcohol and improves treatment outcome. Psychol Sci 22:490-497.
52. Wiers RW, Rinck M, Dictus M, Van den Wildenberg E (2009b) Relatively strong automatic appetitive action tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-Allele. Genes Brain Behav 8:101-106.
53. Wiers RW, Rinck M, Kordts R, Houben K, Strack F (2010) Retraining automatic action tendencies to approach alcohol in hazardous drinkers. Addiction 105:279-287.