Assessing Public Perception of Landscape: From Practice to Policy

Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 123-144

  Scott, Alister ^a  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0345016974     PISSN: 1523908X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1523908032000121193     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Appleton, J. (1994) Running before we can walk: are we ready to map "beauty"?, Landscape Research, 19(3), pp. 112-119.
2. Appleton, J. (1996) The Experience of Landscape, revised edn (Chichester, Wiley).
3. Brabyn, L. (1996) Landscape classification using GIS and national digital databases, Landscape Research, 21 (3), pp. 277-299.
4. Bullen, J. M., Jones, E. M. & Scott, A. J. (1998a) LANDMAP Pilot: Public Perception of Landscape. Unpublished report to Countryside Council for Wales (Bangor, Countryside Council for Wales).
5. Bullen, J. M., Jones, E. M. & Scott, A. J. (1998b) LANDMAP: Public Perception of the Gwynedd Landscape. Unpublished report to Gwynedd County Council (Caernarfon, Gwynedd County Council).
6. Bullen, J. M., Jones, E. M. & Scott, A. J. (1999) LANDMAP: Public Perception of the Cardiff Landscape. Unpublished report to Cardiff County Council (Cardiff, Cardiff County Council).
7. Burgess, J. (1996) Focusing on fear: The use of focus groups in a project for the Community Forest Unit, Countryside Commission, Area, (28) (28)2, pp. 130-135.
8. Burgess, J. (1999) The Genesis of In-Depth Discussion Groups: A Response to Liz Bondi, Professional Geographer, 51(3), pp. 458-460.
9. Burgess, J., Harrison, C. & Lumb, M. (1988) Exploring environmental values through medium of small groups, Environment and Planning A, (20), pp. 309-326.
10. Byrne, S. M. (1979) Perception of the landscape in the Lands End Peninsula, Landscape Research, 5(1), pp. 21-24.
11. Clifford, S. & King, A. (Ed.) (1993) Local distinctiveness: Place, Particularity and Identity (London, Common Ground).
12. Countryside Agency (2003) Local Heritage Initiative. www.countryside.gov. uk/lhi, accessed 11 February 2003.
13. Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage (2002) Landscape Character Assessment: Guidance for England & Scotland (Countryside Agency/Scottish Natural Heritage: Cheltenham/Edinburgh).
14. Countryside Commission (1987) Landscape Assessment: a Countryside Commission approach. CCD 18 (Cheltenham, Countryside Commission).
15. Countryside Commission (1990) The Cambrian Mountains Landscape. Report produced for the Countryside Commission by Cobham Resource Consultants (Cheltenham, Countryside Commission).
16. Countryside Commission (1991a) The East Hampshire landscape: an assessment of the area of outstanding natural beauty. Report produced for the Countryside Commission by Cobham Resource Consultants (Cheltenham, Countryside Commission).
17. Countryside Commission (1991b) The North Pennines Landscape, a landscape assessment, report produced for the Countryside Commission by Land Use Consultants (Cheltenham, Countryside Commission).
18. Countryside Commission (1992) The Tamar Valle Landscape; A landscape Assessment, report produced for the Countryside Commission by Cobham Resource Consultants (Cheltenham, Countryside Commission).
19. Countryside Commission (1993) Landscape Assessment Guidance CCP423 (Cheltenham, Countryside Commission).
20. Countryside Council for Wales (1996) The Welsh landscape: our inheritance and its future protection and enhancement. CCC16 (Bangor, Countryside Council for Wales).
21. Countryside Council for Wales (1999) LANDMAP (The landscape assessment and decision making process. Initial draft handbook. (Bangor, Countryside Council for Wales).
22. Countryside Council for Wales (2001) The LANDMAP Information System (Bangor, Countryside Council for Wales).
23. Coventry-Solihull-Warwickshire Sub Regional Planning Study group (1971) A strategy for the sub-region, Supplementary report 5 "Countryside" (Coventry, Warwickshire County Council).
24. Crofts, R. S. (1975) The landscape component approach to landscape evaluation, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 66, pp. 124-129.
25. Crouch, D. & Matless, D. (1996) Reconfiguring geography: parish maps and common ground, Transactions of the British Geographers, 21(1), pp. 236-255.
26. Duffield, B. S. and Coppock, J. T. (1975) The delineation of recreational landscapes: the role of a computer based information system, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 66, pp. 141-148.
27. Dunn, M. C. (1976) Landscape with photographs: testing the preference approach to landscape evaluation, Journal of Environmental Management, 4, pp. 15-26.
28. Edwards, W. J. (1998) Charting the discourse of community action: perspectives from practice in rural Wales, Journal of Rural Studies, 14(1), pp. 63-77.
29. Emmelin, L. (1996) Landscape impact analysis: a systematic approach to landscape impacts policy, Landscape Research, 21(1), pp. 13-35.
30. Fines, K. D. (1968) Landscape evaluation: a research project in East Sussex, Regional Studies, 2, pp. 41-55.
31. Francis, D. & Henderson, P. (1992) Working with Rural Communities (London, Macmillan).
32. Gold, J. R. (1980) An Introduction to Behavioural Geography (London, Oxford University Press).
33. Gold, J. R. & Burgess, J. (1982) Valued Environments (London, Allen and Unwin).
34. Gourlay, D. & Slee, B. (1998) Public preferences for landscape features: A case study of two Scottish environmentally sensitive areas, Journal of Rural Studies, 14(2), pp. 249-263.
35. Green, B. (1981) Countryside Conservation (London, George Allen and Unwin).
36. Greeves, T. (1987) Parish Maps: Celebrating and Looking After Your Place (London, Common Ground).
37. Greeves, T. & Taylor, R. (1987) The Local Jigsaw: An Information pack on Village Appraisals and Parish Maps (Cheltenham, Countryside Commission/Rural Development Commission).
38. Henson, L. (1990) The US forest service recreation strategy: bringing the great outdoors to the American people, in: Talbott (Ed.) People Trees & Woods, pp. 7-13. Proceedings of the 1989 Countryside Recreation Conference, organized by the Countryside Recreation Research Advisory Group, Heriot-Watts University, Edinburgh, 19-21 September, Bristol (RAG).
39. Henwood, K. & Pigeon, N. (2001) Talk about woods and trees: threat of urbanization, stability and biodiversity, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(2), pp. 125-147.
40. House, M. & Fordham, M. (1997) Public perception of River Corridors and Attitudes towards River Works, Landscape Research, 22(1), pp. 25-44.
41. Jacques, D. L. (1980) Landscape Appraisal: The Case for a Subjective Theory, Journal of Environmental Management, 10, pp. 107-113.
42. Kaplan, S. & Kaplan, R. (1982) Cognition and environment: functioning in an uncertain world (New York, Praeger), chapter 4.
43. Kent, R. L. (1993) Attributes, features and reasons for enjoyment of scenic routes: a comparison of experts, residents and citizens, Landscape Research, 18(2), pp. 92-102.
44. Kingston, R., Carver, S., Evans, A. & Turton, I. (1999) Virtual Decision Making in Spatial Planning: Web-based Geographical Information Systems For Public Participation In Environmental Decision Making. Paper presented at the International Conference on Public Participation and Information Technology, Lisbon, Portugal.
45. Lee, S. A. (1982) The value of the local area, in: J. R. Gold & J. Burgess (Ed.) Valued Environments, pp. 161-171 (London, George Allen and Unwin).
46. Linton, D. L. (1968) The assessment of scenery as a natural resource, Scottish Geographical Magazine, 84, pp. 219-238.
47. Local Government Management Board (1994) Community Participation in Local Agenda 21, in: Local Agenda 21 Roundtable Guidance, pp. 1-7 (Luton, Local Government Management Board).
48. Mid and West Wales Strategic Planning Forum (1998) Draft Strategic Planning Statement (Aberaeron, Ceredigion County Council).
49. Moore-Colyer, R. (1999) From Great Wen to Toad Hall: Aspects of the urban-rural divide in inter-war Britain, Rural History, 10(1), pp. 105-124.
50. Muir, R. (1999) Approaches to Landscape (London, Macmillan).
51. National Assembly for Wales (2002) Planning Policy Wales (Cardiff, NAW).
52. Nicholls, D. & Sclater, A. (1993) Cutting quality down to scale, Landscape Design 218, pp. 39-41.
53. Office for National Statistics (1991) ONS Classification of Wards in Great Britain (Local Government Version). Produced for the Local Government Management Board (Luton, Local Government Management Board).
54. Owen, S. (1999) Village design statements: some aspects of the evolution of a planning tool in the UK, Town Planning Review, 70(1), pp. 41-59.
55. Penning-Rowsell, E. C. (1974) Landscape evaluation for development plans, Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute, 60, pp. 930-934.
56. Penning-Rowsell, E. C. (1981) Assessing the validity of landscape evaluations, Landscape Research, 6(2), pp. 22-24.
57. Penning-Rowsell, E. C. (1982) A public preference evaluation of landscape quality, Regional Studies, 16(2), pp. 97-112.
58. Penning-Rowsell, E. C. (1989) Landscape evaluation in practice: a survey of local authorities, Landscape Research, 14(2), pp. 35-37.
59. Penning-Rowsell, E. C. & Hardy, D. I. (1973) Landscape evaluation and planning policy: a comparative survey in the Wye Valley Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, Regional Studies, 16(2), pp. 97-112.
60. Rieser, R. (1972) Urban spatial images: an appraisal of the choice of respondents and measurement situation, Discussion Paper 42 (London, London School of Economics).
61. Roberts, T. (1998) The seven lamps of planning, Paper presented at the Town and Country Planning Summer School, September 1998 (www.planning.haynet. com).
62. Sanoff, H. (1991) Visual research methods in design (New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold).
63. Scott, A. J. (1998) The role of forums in sustainable rural development: case studies from rural Wales, Journal of Environmental Management, 54, pp. 291-303.
64. Scott, A. J. (2002) Assessing public perception of landscape: the LANDMAP experience, Landscape Research, 27(3), pp. 271-295.
65. Scott, A. J. & Jones, E. M. (1998) Focus groups. Technical briefing sheet to Jigso, WCVA, Aberystwyth.
66. Seddon, A. (1986) Landscape Planning: A conceptual perspective, Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, pp. 335-347.
67. Selman P. (2002) Multi-function Landscape Plans: a missing link in sustainability planning? Local Environment, 7(3), pp. 283-294.
68. Shafer, E. L. & Brush, R. O. (1977) How to measure preferences for photographs of natural landscapes, Landscape Planning, 4, pp. 237-256.
69. Smith, B. (1994) The Medway River Project: an example of community participation in integrated river management, in C. Kirby & W. R. White (Eds) Integrated River basin development (Chichester, Wiley).
70. Tewdwr Jones, M. & Thomas, H. (1998) Collaborative action in local plan making: planners' perceptions of "planning through debate", Environment and Planning B Planning and design, 25, pp. 127-144.
71. Tewdwr Jones, M. & Phelps, N. (2000) Levelling the Uneven Playing Field: Inward Investment, Interregional Rivalry and the Planning System, Regional Studies, 34(5), pp. 429-440.
72. Thomas, H. (1996) Public participation in planning, in: Tewdwr Jones, M. (Ed.) British Planning Policy in Transition Planning in the 1990's (London, UCL press).
73. Tress, B. & Tress, G. (2000) Scenarios for the multifunctional use of landscapes in Denmark, http:// www.tress.ee/scenario.html, accessed 20 September 2000 (Roskilde, Centre for Landscape Research).
74. University of Manchester, Landscape Evaluation Research Project (1976) Landscape Evaluation: a report of the Landscape Evaluation Research Project (Manchester, University of Manchester).
75. Wherrett, J. R. (2001) Creating landscape preference models using internet survey techniques, Landscape Research, 25(1), pp. 79-96.
76. Yorkshire Dales National Park (1992) Landscapes for tomorrow (Grassington, Yorkshire Dales National Park).