Between-sex genetic covariance constrains the evolution of sexual dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1721-1732

  Ingleby, F C ^a   Innocenti, P ^b   Rundle, H D ^c   Morrow, E H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

B matrix; Cuticular hydrocarbons; G matrix; Intralocus sexual conflict; Sexually antagonistic selection

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ANTAGONISM; FLY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIATION; MATRIX; SELECTION; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

HYDROCARBON;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HAPLOTYPE; MALE; METABOLISM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; HAPLOTYPES; HYDROCARBONS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84904436204     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12429     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aitchison, J. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
3. Barker, B.S., Phillips, P.C. & Arnold, S.J. 2010. A test of the conjecture that G-matrices are more stable than B-matrices. Evolution 64: 2601-2613.
4. Bedhomme, S., Chippindale, A.K., Prasad, N.G., Delcourt, M., Abbott, J.K., Mallet, M.A. et al. 2011. Male-limited evolution suggests no extant intralocus sexual conflict over the sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. 90: 1-10.
5. Billeter, J.C., Atallah, J., Krupp, J.J., Millar, J.G. & Levine, J.D. 2009. Specialized cells tag sexual and species identity in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 461: 987-992.
6. Blows, M.W. & Walsh, B. 2009. Spherical cows grazing in flatland: constraints to selection and adaptation. In: Adaptation and Fitness in Animal Populations (J. van der Werf, H.U. Graser, R. Frankham & C. Gondro, eds), pp. 83-101. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
7. Bonduriansky, R. & Chenoweth, S.F. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 280-288.
8. Bretman, A., Westmancoat, J.D., Gage, M.J.G. & Chapman, T. 2011. Males use multiple, redundant cues to detect mating rivals. Curr. Biol. 21: 617-622.
9. Byrne, P.G. & Rice, W.R. 2006. Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. B 273: 917-922.
10. Chenoweth, S.F. & Blows, M.W. 2003. Signal trait sexual dimorphism and mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 57: 2326-2334.
11. Chenoweth, S.F., Rundle, H.D. & Blows, M.W. 2008. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 171: 22-34.
12. Cox, R.M. & Calsbeek, R. 2009. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173: 176-187.
13. Coyne, J.A., Crittenden, A.P. & Mah, K. 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265: 1461-1464.
14. Delph, L.F., Gehring, J.L., Frey, F.M., Arntz, A.M. & Levri, M. 2004. Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection. Evolution 58: 1936-1946.
15. Everaerts, C., Farine, J.P., Cobb, M. & Ferveur, J.F. 2010. Drosophila cuticular hydrocarbons revisited: mating status alters cuticular profiles. PLoS ONE 5: e9607.
16. Fairbairn, D.J., Blanckenhorn, W.U. & Szekely, T. (eds) 2007. Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
17. Foley, B.R. & Telonis-Scott, M. 2011. Quantitative genetic analysis suggests causal association between cuticular hydrocarbon composition and desiccation survival in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 106: 68-77.
18. Foley, B., Chenoweth, S.F., Nuzhdin, S.V. & Blows, M.W. 2007. Natural genetic variation in cuticular hydrocarbon expression in male and female Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 175: 1465-1477.
19. Frentiu, F.D. & Chenoweth, S.F. 2010. Clines in cuticular hydrocarbons in two Drosophila species with independent population histories. Evolution 64: 1784-1794.
20. Gibbs, A.G., Louie, A.K. & Ayala, J.A. 1998. Effects of temperature on cuticular lipids and water balance in a desert Drosophila: is thermal acclimation beneficial? J. Exp. Biol. 201: 71-80.
21. Gosden, T.P. & Chenoweth, S.F. 2014. The evolutionary stability of cross-sex, cross-trait genetic covariances. Evolution. doi:10.1111/evo.2398.
22. Gosden, T.P., Shastri, K.L., Innocenti, P. & Chenoweth, S.F. 2012. The B-matrix harbors significant and sex-specific constraints on the evolution of multicharacter sexual dimorphism. Evolution 66: 2106-2116.
23. Grillet, M., Darteville, L. & Ferveur, J.F. 2006. A Drosophila male pheromone affects female sexual receptivity. Proc. R. Soc. B 273: 315-323.
24. Hadfield, J.D. 2010. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Softw. 33: 1-22.
25. Hansen, T.F. & Houle, D. 2008. Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraint in multivariate characters. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 1201-1219.
26. Higgie, M., Chenoweth, S.F. & Blows, M.W. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290: 519-521.
27. Hine, E., Chenoweth, S.F. & Blows, M.W. 2004. Multivariate quantitative genetics and the lek paradox: genetic variance in male sexually selected traits in Drosophila serrata under field conditions. Evolution 58: 2754-2762.
28. Ingleby, F.C., Hunt, J. & Hosken, D.J. 2013a. Genotype-by-environment interactions for female mate choice of male cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila simulans. PLoS ONE 6: e67623.
29. Ingleby, F.C., Hosken, D.J., Flowers, K., Hawkes, M.F., Lane, S.M., Rapkin, J. et al. 2013b. Genotype-by-environment interactions for cuticular hydrocarbon expression in Drosophila simulans. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 94-107.
30. Innocenti, P. & Morrow, E.H. 2010. The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol. 8: e1000335.
31. Kingsolver, J.G., Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hill, C.E. et al. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157: 245-261.
32. Kwan, L. & Rundle, H.D. 2010. Adaptation to desiccation fails to generate pre- and postmating isolation in replicate Drosophila melanogaster laboratory populations. Evolution 64: 710-723.
33. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292-305.
34. Lande, R. 1987. Genetic correlations between the sexes in the evolution of sexual dimorphism and mating preferences. In: Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives (J.W. Bradbury & M. Andersson, eds), pp. 83-94. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.
35. Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
36. Lewis, Z., Wedell, N. & Hunt, J. 2011. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Evolution 65: 2085-2097.
37. Long, T.A.F. & Rice, W.R. 2007. Adult locomotory activity mediates intralocus sexual conflict in a laboratory-adapted population of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. B 274: 3105-3112.
38. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
39. Merila, J., Sheldon, B.C. & Ellegren, H. 1997. Antagonistic natural selection revealed by molecular sex identification of nestling collared flycatchers. Mol. Ecol. 6: 1167-1175.
40. Merila, J., Sheldon, B.C. & Ellegren, H. 1998. Quantitative genetics of sexual size dimorphism in the collared flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. Evolution 52: 870-876.
41. Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. & Buccianti, A. 2011. Compositional Data Analysis: Theory and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, London, UK.
42. Pennell, T.M. & Morrow, E.H. 2013. Two sexes, one genome: the evolutionary dynamics of intralocus sexual conflict. Ecol. Evol. 3: 1819-1834.
43. Poissant, J., Wilson, A.J. & Coltman, D.W. 2010. Sex-specific genetic variance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a systematic review of cross-sex genetic correlations. Evolution 64: 97-107.
44. Rice, W.R., Linder, J.E., Friberg, U., Lew, T.A., Morrow, E.H. & Stewart, A.D. 2005. Inter-locus antagonistic coevolution as an engine of speciation: assessment with hemiclonal analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 6527-6534.
45. Rundle, H.D. & Chenoweth, S.F. 2011. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 65: 893-899.
46. Rundle, H.D., Chenoweth, S.F. & Blows, M.W. 2008. Comparing complex fitness surfaces: among-population variation in mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata. Am. Nat. 171: 443-454.
47. Rundle, H.D., Chenoweth, S.F. & Blows, M.W. 2009. The diversification of mate preferences by natural and sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 1608-1615.
48. Savarit, F. & Ferveur, J.F. 2002. Temperature affects the ontogeny of sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 205: 3241-3249.
49. Stearns, S.C., Govindaraju, D.R., Ewbank, D. & Byars, S.G. 2012. Constraints on the coevolution of contemporary human males and females. Proc. R. Soc. B 279: 4836-4844.
50. Wyman, M.J., Stinchcombe, J.R. & Rowe, L. 2013. A multivariate view of the evolution of sexual dimorphism. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 2070-2080.