The diversification of mate preferences by natural and sexual selection

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1608-1615

  Rundle, H D ^a,b   Chenoweth, S F ^b   Blows, M W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cuticular hydrocarbons; Drosophila serrata; Ecological speciation; Experimental evolution; Mate preferences; Random regression; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

HYDROCARBON;

DIVERGENCE; FLY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATE CHOICE; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; MALE; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; HYDROCARBONS; MALE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

DROSOPHILA SERRATA;

EID: 67650447976     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01773.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Atchison, J. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. Chapman and Hall, London.
2. Blows, M.W. Allan, R.A. 1998. Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Am. Nat. 152 : 826 837. (Pubitemid 28542301)
3. Blows, M.W., Chenoweth, S.F. Hine, E. 2004. Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits. Am. Nat. 163 : 329 340. (Pubitemid 38459255)
4. Bonduriansky, R. Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual selection, genetic architecture, and the condition dependence of body shape in the sexually dimorphic fly Prochyliza xanthostoma (Piophilidae). Evolution 59 : 138 151. (Pubitemid 40181306)
5. Borg, I. Groenen, P.J.F. 1997. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. Springer, New York, NY.
6. Bring, J. 1996. A geometric approach to compare variables in a regression model. Am. Stat. 50 : 57 62.
7. Byers, J.A., Wiseman, P.A., Jones, L. Roffe, T.J. 2005. A large cost of female mate sampling in pronghorn. Am. Nat. 166 : 661 668. (Pubitemid 41778881)
8. Cameron, E., Day, T. Rowe, L. 2003. Sexual conflict and indirect benefits. J. Evol. Biol. 16 : 1055 1060. (Pubitemid 37073874)
9. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. Rowe, L. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18 : 41 47. (Pubitemid 36048852)
10. Chenoweth, S.F. Blows, M.W. 2003. Signal trait sexual dimorphism and mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 57 : 2326 2334. (Pubitemid 37388024)
11. Chenoweth, S.F. Blows, M.W. 2005. Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata. Am. Nat. 165 : 281 289. (Pubitemid 40263667)
12. Chenoweth, S.F., Rundle, H.D. Blows, M.W. 2008. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 171 : 22 34. (Pubitemid 351226025)
13. Coyne, J. Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
14. Dodd, D.M.B. 1989. Reproductive isolation as a consequence of adaptive divergence in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 43 : 1308 1311.
15. Dolgin, E.S., Whitlock, M.C. Agrawal, A.F. 2006. Male Drosophila melanogaster have higher mating success when adapted to their thermal environment. J. Evol. Biol. 19 : 1894 1900. (Pubitemid 44574362)
16. Fairbairn, D.J. Preziosi, R.F. 1996. Sexual selection and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius remigis. Evolution 50 : 1549 1559.
17. Fricke, C. Arnqvist, G. 2007. Rapid adaptation to a novel host in a seed beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus): The role of sexual selection. Evolution 61 : 440 454. (Pubitemid 46411619)
18. Head, M.L., Hunt, J., Jennions, M.D. Brooks, R. 2005. The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. PLoS Biol. 3 : 289 294.
19. Higgie, M. Blows, M.W. 2007. Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection? Am. Nat. 170 : 409 420. (Pubitemid 47312846)
20. Higgie, M., Chenoweth, S. Blows, M.W. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290 : 519 521. (Pubitemid 30808943)
21. Hine, E. Blows, M.W. 2006. Determining the effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix. Genetics 173 : 1135 1144. (Pubitemid 43945925)
22. Hine, E., Lachish, S., Higgie, M. Blows, M.W. 2002. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and offspring fitness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269 : 2215 2219. (Pubitemid 35341907)
23. Hine, E., Chenoweth, S.F. Blows, M.W. 2004. Multivariate quantitative genetics and the lek paradox: Genetic variance in male sexually selected traits of Drosophila serrata under field conditions. Evolution 58 : 2754 2762. (Pubitemid 40078421)
24. Holland, B. 2002. Sexual selection fails to promote adaptation to a new environment. Evolution 56 : 721 730. (Pubitemid 34519783)
25. Houle, D. Kondrashov, A.S. 2002. Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 269 : 97 104. (Pubitemid 34117349)
26. Howard, R.W., Jackson, L.L., Banse, H. Blows, M.W. 2003. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila birchii and D. serrata: identification and role in mate choice in D. serrata. J. Chem. Ecol. 29 : 961 976. (Pubitemid 36438268)
27. Jennions, M.D., Moller, A.P. Petrie, M. 2001. Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis. Q. Rev. Biol. 76 : 3 36. (Pubitemid 32235227)
28. Kilias, G., Alahiotis, S.N. Pelecanos, M. 1980. A multifactorial genetic investigation of speciation theory using Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 34 : 730 737. (Pubitemid 10026301)
29. Kirkpatrick, M. Barton, N.H. 1997. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94 : 1282 1286. (Pubitemid 27087842)
30. Kirkpatrick, M. Meyer, K. 2004. Direct estimation of genetic principal components: simplified analysis of complex phenotypes. Genetics 168 : 2295 2306. (Pubitemid 40066362)
31. Kokko, H., Brooks, R., Jennions, M.D. Morley, J. 2003. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270 : 653 664. (Pubitemid 36359742)
32. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78 : 3721 3725. (Pubitemid 11060449)
33. Lande, R. Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37 : 1210 1226.
34. Lorch, P.D., Proulx, S., Rowe, L. Day, T. 2003. Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5 : 867 881. (Pubitemid 38681657)
35. Manly, B.F.J. 1985. The Statistics of Natural Selection on Animal Populations. Chapman and Hall, London.
36. McGuigan, K., Van Homrigh, A. Blows, M.W. 2008. Genetic analysis of female preference functions as function-valued traits. Am. Nat. 172 : 194 202.
37. Meyer, K. Kirkpatrick, M. 2005. Up hill, down dale: quantitative genetics of curvaceous traits. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 360 : 1443 1455. (Pubitemid 43138547)
38. Nosil, P., Crespi, B.J. Sandoval, C.P. 2002. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 417 : 440 443. (Pubitemid 34563535)
39. Petfield, D., Chenoweth, S.F., Rundle, H.D. Blows, M.W. 2005. Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102 : 6045 6050. (Pubitemid 40594252)
40. Reid, J.M., Arcese, P., Cassidy, A., Hiebert, S.M., Smith, J.N.M., Stoddard, P.K., Marr, A.B. Keller, L.F. 2005. Fitness correlates of song repertoire size in free-living song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Am. Nat. 165 : 299 310. (Pubitemid 40441277)
41. Rice, W.R. Holland, B. 2005. Experimentally enforced monogamy: inadvertent selection, inbreeding, or evidence for sexually antagonistic' coevolution? Evolution 59 : 682 685. (Pubitemid 40441333)
42. Rice, W.R. Hostert, E.E. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation - what have we learned in 40 years. Evolution 47 : 1637 1653. (Pubitemid 2097320)
43. Rundle, H.D. Nosil, P. 2005. Ecological speciation. Ecol. Lett. 8 : 336 352. (Pubitemid 40393919)
44. Rundle, H.D., Nagel, L., Boughman, J.W. Schluter, D. 2000. Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287 : 306 308. (Pubitemid 30046757)
45. Rundle, H.D., Chenoweth, S.F., Doughty, P. Blows, M.W. 2005. Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences. Publ. Libr. Sci. 3 : 1988 1995. (Pubitemid 41652451)
46. Rundle, H.D., Chenoweth, S.F. Blows, M.W. 2006. The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment. Evolution 60 : 2218 2225. (Pubitemid 44925465)
47. Rundle, H.D., Chenoweth, S.F. Blows, M.W. 2008. Comparing complex fitness surfaces: among-population variation in mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata. Am. Nat. 171 : 443 454.
48. Savarit, F. Ferveur, J.F. 2002. Genetic study of the production of sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons in relation with the sex-determination gene transformer in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 79 : 23 40. (Pubitemid 34256891)
49. Schluter, D. 2000. Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
50. Skroblin, A. Blows, M.W. 2006. Measuring natural and sexual selection on breeding values of male display traits in Drosophila serrata. J. Evol. Biol. 19 : 35 41.
51. Turelli, M., Barton, N.H. Coyne, J.A. 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16 : 330 343. (Pubitemid 32525773)
52. Wagner, W.E. Jr. 1998. Measuring female mating preferences. Anim. Behav. 55 : 1029 1042.