The evolutionary stability of cross-sex, cross-trait genetic covariances

Evolution

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1687-1697

  Gosden, Thomas P ^a,b   Chenoweth, Stephen F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

B matrix; Cuticular hydrocarbons; Drosophila serrata; G matrix; Intersexual genetic correlation

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CUTICLE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLY; GENETIC VARIATION; HERITABILITY; HYDROCARBON; LATITUDINAL GRADIENT; NATURAL SELECTION; PHEROMONE; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

DROSOPHILA SERRATA;

SEX PHEROMONE;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MALE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX ATTRACTANTS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 84901692771     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12398     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aguirre, J. D., E. Hine, K. McGuigan, and M. W. Blows. 2014. Comparing G: multivariate analysis of genetic variation in multiple populations. Heredity 112:21-29.
2. Aitchison, J. 1986. The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman & Hall, London.
3. Alicchio, R., and D. L. Palenzona. 1971. Changes of sexual dimorphism values in Drosophila melanogaster. Boll. Zool. 38:75-84.
4. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Arnold, S. J., R. Burger, P. A. Hohenlohe, B. C. Ajie, and A. G. Jones. 2008. Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix. Evolution 62:2451-2461.
6. Barker, B. S., P. C. Phillips, and S. J. Arnold. 2010. A test of the conjecture that G-matrices are more stable than B-matrices. Evolution 64:2601-2613.
7. Bedhomme, S., and A. K. Chippindale. 2007. Irreconcilable difference: when sexual dimorphism fails to resolve sexual conflict. Pp. 185-194 in D. J. Fairbairn, W. U. Blanckenhorn, and T. Szekely, eds. Sex, size and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
8. Bird, M. A., and H. E. Schaffer. 1972. Study of genetic basis of sexual dimorphism for wing length in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72:475-487.
9. Blows, M. W. 2007. A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology. J. Evol. Biol. 20:1-8.
10. Blows, M. W., and R. A. Allan. 1998. Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Am. Nat. 152:826-837.
11. Bonduriansky, R., and S. F. Chenoweth. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:280-288.
12. Borg, I., and P. J. F. Groenen. 2005, Modern multidimensional scaling: theory and applications: Springer series in statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
13. Campbell, D. R., S. G. Weller, A. K. Sakai, T. M. Culley, P. N. Dang, and A. K. Dunbar-Wallis. 2011. Genetic variation and covariation in floral allocation of two species of Schiedea with contrasting levels of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 65:757-770.
14. Chenoweth, S. F., and M. W. Blows. 2003. Signal trait sexual dimorphism and mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 57:2326-2334.
15. Chenoweth, S. F., and M. W. Blows. 2005. Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata Am. Nat. 165:281-289.
16. Chenoweth, S. F., and M. W. Blows. 2008. Q(st) meets the G matrix: the dimensionality of adaptive divergence in multiple correlated quantitative traits. Evolution 62:1437-1449.
17. Chenoweth, S. F., H. D. Rundle, and M. W. Blows. 2008. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 171:22-34.
18. Chenoweth, S. F., H. D. Rundle, and M. W. Blows. 2010. The contribution of selection and genetic constraints to phenotypic divergence. Am. Nat. 175:186-196.
19. Cheverud, J. M., M. M. Dow, and W. Leutenegger. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses-sexual dimorphism in body-weight among primates. Evolution 39:1335-1351.
20. Connallon, T., and A. G. Clark. 2010. Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression. Evolution 64:3417-3442.
21. Cox, R. M., and R. Calsbeek. 2009. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173:176-187.
22. Delph, L. F., J. L. Gehring, F. M. Frey, A. M. Arntz, and M. Levri. 2004. Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection. Evolution 58:1936-1946.
23. Delph, L. F., J. C. Steven, I. A. Anderson, C. R. Herlihy, and E. D. Brodie. 2011. Elimination of a genetic correlation between the sexes via artificial correlational selection. Evolution 65:2872-2880.
24. Fairbairn, D. J., W. U. Blanckenhorn, and T. Szekely. 2007. Sex, size and gender roles. Evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
25. Frentiu, F. D., and S. F. Chenoweth. 2010. Clines in cuticular hydrocarbons in two drosophila species with independent population histories. Evolution 64:1784-1794.
26. Gelman, A., and D. B. Rubin. 1992. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7:457-472.
27. Geweke, J. 1992. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to calculating posterior moments. Pp. 169-193 in J. M. Bernardo, J. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and J. F. M. Smith, eds. Bayesian statistics 4. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
28. Gosden, T. P., K.-L. Shastri, P. Innocenti, and S. F. Chenoweth. 2012. The B-matrix harbors significant and sex-specific constraints on the evolution of multicharacter sexual dimorphism. Evolution 66:2106-2116.
29. Gower, J. C., and B. Zeilman. 1998. Orthogonality and its approximation in the analysis of asymmetry. Linear Algebra Appl. 278:183-193.
30. Hadfield, J. D. 2012. MCMCglmm course notes. Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MCMCglmm/vignettes/CourseNotes.pdf.
31. Hedrick, A. V., and E. J. Temeles. 1989. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals-hypotheses and tests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4:136-138.
32. Hine, E., S. Lachish, M. Higgie, and M. W. Blows. 2002. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and offspring fitness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 269:2215-2219.
33. Innocenti, P., and S. F. Chenoweth. 2013. Interspecific divergence of transcription networks along lines of genetic variance in Drosophila: dimensionality, evolvability, and constraint. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:1358-1367.
34. Jones, A. G., S. J. Arnold, and R. Borger. 2003. Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift. Evolution 57:1747-1760.
35. Krzanowski, W. J. 1979. Between-groups comparison of principal components. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74:703-707.
36. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34:292-305.
37. Lande, R. 1987. Genetic correlations between the sexes in the evolution of sexual dimorphism and mating preferences. Pp. 83-94 in J. W. Bradbury and M. Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, New York.
38. Lewis, Z., N. Wedell, and J. Hunt. 2011. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Evolution 65:2085-2097.
39. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998, Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
40. Meagher, T. 1999. Quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism. Pp. 275-294 in M. A. Geber, T. E. Dawson, and L. F. Delph, eds. Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
41. Morrissey, M. B., C. A. Walling, A. J. Wilson, J. M. Pemberton, T. H. Clutton-Brock, and L. E. B. Kruuk. 2012. Genetic analysis of life-history constraint and evolution in a wild ungulate population. Am. Nat. 179:E97-E114.
42. Podolsky, R. H., R. G. Shaw, and F. H. Shaw. 1997. Population structure of morphological traits in Clarkia dudleyana. II. Constancy of within-population genetic variance. Evolution 51:1785-1796.
43. Reeve, J. P., and D. J. Fairbairn. 2001. Predicting the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. J. Evol. Biol. 14:244-254.
44. Revell, L. J. 2007. The G matrix under fluctuating correlational mutation and selection. Evolution 61:1857-1872.
45. Rice, W. R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735-742.
46. Rundle, H. D., and S. F. Chenoweth. 2011. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 65:893-899.
47. Rundle, H. D., S. F. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows. 2008. Comparing complex fitness surfaces: among-population variation in mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata. Am. Nat. 171:443-454.
48. Shaw, F. H., R. G. Shaw, G. S. Wilkinson, and M. Turelli. 1995. Changes in genetic variances and covariances: G whiz! Evolution 49:1260-1267.
49. Shine, R. 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism-a review of the evidence. Q. Rev. Biol. 64:419-461.
50. Slatkin, M. 1984. Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:622-630.
51. Steppan, S. J., P. C. Phillips, and D. Houle. 2002. Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:320-327.
52. Steven, J. C., L. F. Delph, and E. D. Brodie. 2007. Sexual dimorphism in the quantitative-genetic architecture of floral, leaf, and allocation traits in Silene latifolia. Evolution 61:42-57.
53. Turelli, M. 1988. Phenotypic evolution, constant covariances, and the maintenance of additive variance. Evolution 42:1342-1347.
54. Wilkinson, G. S., K. Fowler, and L. Partridge. 1990. Resistance of genetic correlation structure to directional selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 44:1990-2003.
55. Wyman, M. J., J. R. Stinchcombe, and L. Rowe. 2013. A multivariate view of the evolution of sexual dimorphism. J. Evol. Biol. 26:2070-2080.