Adult locomotory activity mediates intralocus sexual conflict in a laboratory-adapted population of Drosophila melanogaster

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 274, Issue 1629, 2007, Pages 3105-3112

  Long, Tristan A F ^a   Rice, William R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fitness; Gender load; Intralocus sexual conflict; Locomotory activity; Sex chromosomes; Sexually antagonistic alleles

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ALLELE; CHROMOSOME; FITNESS; FLY; GENDER; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; LABORATORY METHOD; LOCOMOTION; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM;

ARTICLE; AUTOSOME; CONFLICT; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; LABORATORY; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 36849041209     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1140     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Angus, J. 1974 Genetic control of activity, preening, and the response to a shadow stimulus in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 4, 317-329. (doi:10.1007/BF01066153)
2. Arbeitman, M. N. et al. 2002 Gene expression during the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 297, 2270-2275. (doi:10.1126/science.1072152)
3. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2005 The natural history of sexual conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Bateman, A. J. 1948 Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349-368.
5. Brommer, J. E., Gustafsson, L., Pietiäinen, H. & Merilä, J. 2004 Single-generation estimates of individual fitness as proxies for long-term genetic contribution. Am. Nat. 163, 505-517. (doi:10.1086/382547)
6. Brooks, R. 2000 Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406, 67-70. (doi:10.1038/35017552)
7. Byrne, P. G. & Rice, W. R. 2005 Remating in Drosophila melanogaster an examination of the trading-up and intrinsic male-quality hypotheses. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 1324-1331. (doi:10.1111/j.1420- 9101.2005.00918.x)
8. Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. M., Wolfner, M. F. & Partridge, L. 1995 Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373, 241-244. (doi:10.1038/373241a0)
9. Chippindale, A. K., Gibson, J. R. & Rice, W. R. 2001 Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 1671-1675. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 041378098)
10. Connolly, K. J. 1966 Locomotor activity in Drosophila as a function of food deprivation. Nature 209, 224. (doi:10. 1038/209224a0)
11. Connolly, K. J. 1967 Locomotor activity in Drosophila. III. A distinction between activity and reactivity. Anim. Behav. 15, 149-152. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(67)80026-5)
12. Cowley, D. E. & Atchley, W. R. 1988 Quantitative genetics of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Heritabilities and genetic correlations between sexes for head and thorax traits. Genetics 119, 421-433.
13. Darwin, C. 1871 The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London, UK: John Murray.
14. Day, T. & Bonduriansky, R. 2004 Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 167, 1537-1546. (doi:10.1534/genetics.103.026211)
15. Ewing, A. W. 1963 Attempts to select for spontaneous activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 11, 369-378. (doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(63)80128-1)
16. Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. 1989 A cost of mating in female fruitflies. Nature 338, 760-761. (doi:10.1038/ 338760a0)
17. Gibson, J. R., Chippindale, A. K. & Rice, W. R. 2002 The X is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc. R. Soc. B 269, 499-505. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1863)
18. Haldane, J. B. S. 1962 Conditions for stable polymorphism at an autosomal locus. Nature 193, 1108. (doi:10.1038/ 1931108a0)
19. Hall, J. C. 1994 The mating of a fly. Science 264, 1702-1714. (doi:10.1126/science.8209251)
20. Houle, D. 1992 Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130, 195-204.
21. Imhoff, M., Harr, B., Brem, G. & Schlotterer, C. 1998 Multiple mating in wild Drosophila melanogaster revisited by microsatellite analysis. Mol. Ecol. 7, 915-917. (doi:10. 1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00382.x)
22. Jin, W., Riley, R. M., Wolfinger, R. D., White, K. P., Passador-Gurgel, G. & Gibson, G. 2001 The contributions of sex, genotype and age to transcriptional variance in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Genet. 29, 389-395. (doi:10.1038/ng766)
23. Jordan, K. W., Morgan, T. J. & Mackay, T. F. C. 2006 Quantitative trait loci for locomotor behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 174, 271-284. (doi:10.1534/ genetics.106.058099)
24. Kidwell, J. F., Clegg, M. T., Stewart, F. M. & Prout, T. 1977 Regions of stable equilibria for models of differential selection in the two sexes under random mating. Genetics 85, 171-183.
25. Kuijper, B., Stewart, A. D. & Rice, W. R. 2006 The cost of mating rises nonlinearly with copulation frequency in a laboratory population of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 19, 1795-1802. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006. 01186.x)
26. Lande, R. 1980 Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34, 292-307. (doi:10.2307/2407393)
27. Lande, R. 1987 Genetic correlations between the sexes in the evolution of sexual dimorphism and mating preferences. In Sexual selection: testing the alternatives (eds J. W. Bradbury & M. B. Anderson), pp. 83-94. New York, NY: Wiley.
28. Le Bourg, E., Lints, F. A. & Lints, C. V. 1984 Does a relationship exist between spontaneous locomotor activity, fitness and lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster? Exp. Gerontol. 19, 205-210. (doi:10.1016/0531-5565(84)90040-8)
29. Linder, J. E. & Rice, W. R. 2005 Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 568-575. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101. 2004.00872.x)
30. Lindsley, D. L. & Grell, E. H. 1968 Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, no. 627. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
31. Martin, J. R. 2004 A portrait of locomotor behaviour in Drosophila determined by a video-tracking paradigm. Behav. Process. 67, 207-219. (doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2004. 04.003)
32. Martin, J. R., Ernst, R. & Heisenberg, M. 1999 Temporal pattern of locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Physiol. A 184, 73-84. (doi:10.1007/s00359 0050307)
33. McArdle, B. H. 1988 The structural relationship: regression in biology. Cau. J. Zool. 66, 2329-2339.
34. Orteiza, N., Linder, J. E. & Rice, W. R. 2005 Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 1315-1323. (doi:10. 1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00923.x)
35. Partridge, L. & Fowler, K. 1990 Non-mating costs of exposure to males in female Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 36, 419-425. (doi:10.1016/0022-1910(90)90059-O)
36. Partridge, L., Hoffmann, A. & Jones, J. S. 1987 Male size and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura under field conditions. Anim. Behav. 35, 468-476. (doi:10.1016/S0003- 3472(87)80272-5)
37. Prasad, N. G. & Bedhomme, S. 2006 Sexual conflict in plants. J. Genet. 85, 161-164.
38. Rhen, T. 2000 Sex-limited mutations and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 54, 37-43.
39. Rhen, T. 2007 Evolution of sex differences: genetic, physiological, and ecological mechanisms. In Sex, size and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism (eds D. J. Fairbairn, W. Blanckenhorn & T. Szekely), pp. 167-175. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40. Rice, W. R. 1984 Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38, 735-742. (doi:10.2307/ 2408385)
41. Rice, W. R. 1992 Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence. Science 256, 1436-1439. (doi:10.1126/science. 1604317)
42. Rice, W. R. & Chippindale, A. K. 2001 Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 685-693. (doi:10. 1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00319.x)
43. Rice, W. R., Linder, J. E., Friberg, U., Lew, T. A., Morrow, E. H. & Stewart, A. D. 2005 Inter-locus antagonistic coevolution as an engine of speciation: assessment with hemiclonal analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102(Suppl. 1), 6527-6534. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0501889102)
44. Rice, W. R., Stewart, A. D., Morrow, E. H., Linder, J. E., Orteiza, N. & Byrne, P. G. 2006 Assessing sexual conflict in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 287-299. (doi:10.1098/rstb. 2005.1787)
45. Roff, D. A. 1997 Evolutionary quantitative genetics. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
46. Rose, M. R. & Charlesworth, B. 1981a Genetics of life-history in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Sib analysis of adult females. Genetics 97, 173-185.
47. Rose, M. R. & Charlesworth, B. 1981b Genetics of life-history in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Exploratory selection experiments. Genetics 97, 187-196.
48. Spieth, H. T. 1974 Courtship behavior in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 19, 385-405. (doi:10.1146/annurev.en.19. 010174.002125)
49. Stewart, A. D., Morrow, E. H. & Rice, W. R. 2005 Assessing putative interlocus sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster using experimental evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 2029-2035. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005. 3182)
50. Tompkins, L., Gross, A. C., Hall, J. C., Gailey, D. A. & Siegel, R. W. 1982 The role of female movement in the sexual behavior of Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 12, 295-307. (doi:10.1007/BF01067849)
51. van Dijken, F. R. & Scharloo, W. 1979a Divergent selection on locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Selection response. Behav. Genet. 9, 543-553. (doi:10. 1007/BF01067350)
52. van Dijken, F. R. & Scharloo, W. 1979b Divergent selection on locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Test for reproductive isolation between selected lines. Behav. Genet. 9, 555-561. (doi:10.1007/BF01067351)