Effect of domestication on the spread of the [PIN+] prion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics

Volumn 197, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 1007-1024

  Kelly, Amy C ^a   Busby, Ben ^b   Wickner, Reed B ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PRION PROTEIN; PRION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL GROWTH; CLADISTICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOMESTICATION; ECOLOGICAL NICHE; FLOCCULATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; HETEROZYGOSITY; HOMOZYGOTE; MOSAICISM; NONHUMAN; OUTCROSSING; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; POLYPLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPOROGENESIS; FUNGUS HYPHAE; FUNGUS SPORE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HAPLOTYPE; HUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRION; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BASE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIATION; HAPLOTYPES; HUMANS; HYPHAE; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; PRIONS; RISK FACTORS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SPORES, FUNGAL;

EID: 84904267198     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.165670     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Abelson, J. N., M. I. Simon, C. Guthrie, and G. R. Fink, 1991 Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego.
2. Anderson, E., and P. A. Martin, 1975 The sporulation and mating of brewing yeasts. J. Inst. Brew. 81: 242-247.
3. Avery, S. V., 2006 Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4: 577-587.
4. Bateman, D. A., and R. B. Wickner, 2012 [PSI+] prion transmission barriers protect Saccharomyces cerevisiae from infection: in-traspecies "species barriers." Genetics 190: 569-579.
5. Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg, 1995 Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57: 289-300.
6. Bishop, A. L., F. A. Rab, E. R. Sumner, and S. V. Avery, 2007 Phenotypic heterogeneity can enhance rare cell survival in stress-sensitive yeast populations. Mol. Microbiol. 63: 507-520.
7. Bisson, L. F., 2012 Geographic origin and diversity of wine strains of Saccharomyces. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 63: 165-176.
8. Briggs, D. E., C. A. Boulton, and P. A. Brookes, 2004 Brewing: Science and Practice. CRC Press, Cleveland, OH; Boca Raton, FL.
9. Bruckner, S., and H.-U. Mosch, 2011 Choosing the right lifestyle: adhesion and development in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36: 25-58.
10. Chernoff, Y. O., A. P. Galkin, E. Lewitin, T. A. Chernova, G. P. Newnam et al., 2000 Evolutionary conservation of prion-forming abilities of the yeast Sup35 protein. Mol. Microbiol. 35: 865-876.
11. Clement, M., D. Posada, and K. A. Crandall, 2000 TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1657-1659.
12. Cubillos, F. A., C. Vasquez, S. Faugeron, A. Ganga, and C. Martinez, 2009 Self fertilization is the main sexual reproduction mechanism in native wine yeast populations. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 67: 162-170.
13. Debets, A. J., H. J. Dalstra, M. Slakhorst, B. Koopmanschap, R. F. Hoekstra et al., 2012 High natural prevalence of a fungal prion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 10432-10437.
14. Derkatch, I. L., M. E. Bradley, P. Zhou, Y. O. Chernoff, and S. W. Liebman, 1997 Genetic and environmental factors affecting the de novo appearance of the [PSI (+)] prion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 147: 507-519.
15. Derkatch, I. L., M. E. Bradley, J. Y. Hong, and S. W. Liebman, 2001 Prions affect the appearance of other prions: the story of [PIN+]. Cell 106: 171-182.
16. Eaglestone, S. S., B. S. Cox, and M. F. Tuite, 1999 Translation termination efficiency can be regulated in Saccharomyces cere-visiae by environmental stress through a prion-mediated mechanism. EMBO J. 18: 1974-1981.
17. Edskes, H. K., and R. B. Wickner, 2013 The [URE3] prion in Candida. Eukaryot. Cell 12: 551-558.
18. Edskes, H. K., A. Engel, L. M. McCann, A. Brachmann, H. F. Tsai et al., 2011 Prion-forming ability of Ure2 of yeasts is not evo-lutionarily conserved. Genetics 188: 81-90.
19. Excoffier, L., M. Foll, and R. M. J. Petit, 2009 Genetic consequences of range expansions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 481-501.
20. Fay, J. C., and J. A. Benavides, 2005 Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 1: e5.
21. Frey, C. N., 1930 History and development of the mordern yeast industry. Ind. Eng. Chem. 22: 1154-1162.
22. Gerke, J. P., C. T. L. Chen, and B. A. Cohen, 2006 Natural isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae display complex genetic variation in sporulation efficiency. Genetics 174: 985-997.
23. Gimeno, C. J., P. O. Ljungdahl, C. A. Styles, and G. R. Fink, 1992 Unipolar cell divisions in the yeast S. cerevisiae lead to filamentous growth: regulation by starvation and RAS. Cell 68: 1077-1090.
24. Guldal, C. G., and J. Broach, 2006 Assay for adhesion and agar invasion in S. cerevisiae. J. Vis. Exp. 8: 64.
25. Guo, B., C. A. Styles, Q. Feng, and G. R. Fink, 2000 A Saccharo-myces gene family involved in invasive growth, cell-cell adhesion, and mating. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 12158-12163.
26. Halfmann, R., D. F. Jarosz, S. K. Jones, A. Chang, A. K. Lancaster et al., 2012 Prions are a common mechanism for phenotypic inheritance in wild yeasts. Nature 482: 363-368.
27. Halme, A., S. Bumgarner, C. Styles, and G. R. Fink, 2004 Genetic and epigenetic regulation of the FLO gene family generates cell-surface variation in yeast. Cell 116: 405-415.
28. Hosoda, N., T. Kobayashi, N. Uchida, Y. Funakoshi, Y. Kikuchi et al., 2003 Translation termination factor eRF3 mediates mRNA decay through the regulation of deadenylation. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 38287-38291.
29. Kadnar, M. L., G. Articov, and I. L. Derkatch, 2010 Distinct type of transmission barrier revealed by study of multiple prion determinants of Rnq1. PLoS Genet. 6: e1000824.
30. Kaiser, C. J. O., S. W. Grotzinger, J. M. Eckl, K. Papsdorf, S. Jordan et al., 2013 A network of genes connects polyglutamine toxic-ity to ploidy control in yeast. Nat. Commun. 4: 1571.
31. Katoh, K., K. Misawa, K. I. Kuma, and T. Miyata, 2002 MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30: 3059-3066.
32. Kellar, J. A., and V. W. Lees, 2003 Risk management of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in North America. Rev. Sci. Tech. 22: 201.
33. Kelly, A. C., and R. B. Wickner, 2013 Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a sexy yeast with a prion problem. Prion 3: 215-220.
34. Kelly, A. C., N. E. Mateus-Pinilla, J. Diffendorfer, E. Jewell, M. O. Ruiz et al., 2008 Prion sequence polymorphisms and chronic wasting disease resistance in Illinois white-tailed deer (Odocoi-leus virginianus). Prion 2: 28-36.
35. Kelly, A. C., F. P. Shewmaker, D. Kryndushkin, and R. B. Wickner, 2012 Sex, prions, and plasmids in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: E2683-E2690.
36. Koufopanou, V., J. Hughes, G. Bell, and A. Burt, 2006 The spatial scale of genetic differentiation in a model organism: the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 361: 1941-1946.
37. Kvitek, D. J., J. L. Will, and A. P. Gasch, 2008 Variations in stress sensitivity and genomic expression in diverse S. cerevisiae isolates. PLoS Genet. 4: e1000223.
38. Legras, J. L., D. Merdinoglu, J. Cornuet, and F. Karst, 2007 Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol. Ecol. 16: 2091-2102.
39. Lesaffre, 2013 Lesaffre group history. Available at: http://www. lesaffre.com/en/the-group/about-us/histoire.html. Accessed: October 10, 2013.
40. Librado, P., and J. Rozas, 2009 DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451-1452.
41. Liti, G., D. M. Carter, A. M. Moses, J. Warringer, L. Parts et al., 2009 Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458: 337-341.
42. Liu, J.-J., and S. Lindquist, 1999 Oligopeptide-repeat expansions modulate protein-only inheritance in yeast. Nature 400: 573-576.
43. Magwene, P. M., O. Kayakci, J. A. Granek, J. M. Reininga, Z. Scholl et al., 2011 Outcrossing, mitotic recombination, and life-history trade-offs shape genome evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 1987-1992.
44. Masel, J., and C. K. Griswold, 2009 The strength of selection against the yeast prion [PSI+]. Genetics 181: 1057-1063.
45. Masison, D. C, and R. B. Wickner, 1995 Prion-inducing domain of yeast Ure2p and protease resistance of Ure2p in prion-containing cells. Science 270: 93-95.
46. McClary, D. O., W. L. Nulty, and G. R. Miller, 1959 Effect of potassium vs. sodium in the sporulation of Saccharomyces. J. Bacteriol. 78: 362-368.
47. McGlinchey R. P., D. Kryndushkin, and R. B. Wickner, 2011 Suicidal [PSI+] is a lethal yeast prion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 5337-5341.
48. Mead, S., J. Whitfield, M. Poulter, P. Shah, J. Uphill et al., 2009 A novel protective prion protein variant that colocalizes with kuru exposure. N. Engl. J. Med. 361: 2056-2065.
49. Medina, E. M., G. W. Jones, and D. A. Fitzpatrick, 2011 Reconstructing the fungal tree of life using phylogenomics and a preliminary investigation of the distribution of yeast prion-like proteins in the fungal kingdom. J. Mol. Evol. 73: 116-133.
50. Mortimer, R., and M. Polsinelli, 1999 On the origins of wine yeast. Res. Microbiol. 150: 199-204.
51. Nakayashiki, T., K. Ebihara, H. Bannai, and Y. Nakamura, 2001 Yeast [PSI+] "prions" that are crosstransmissible and susceptible beyond a species barrier through a quasi-prion state. Mol. Cell 7: 1121-1130.
52. Nakayashiki, T., C. P. Kurtzman, H. K. Edskes, and R. B. Wickner, 2005 Yeast prions [URE3] and [PSI+] are diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 10575-10580.
53. Namy O., A. Galopier, C. Martini, S. Matsufuji, C. Fabret et al., 2008 Epigenetic control of polyamines by the prion [PSI+]. Nat. Cell Biol. 10: 1069-1075.
54. O'Rourke, K. I., G. R. Holyoak, W. W. Clark, J. R. Mickelson, S. Wang et al., 1997 PrP genotypes and experimental scrapie in orally inoculated Suffolk sheep in the United States. J. Gen. Virol. 78: 975-978.
55. Osherovich, L. Z., B. S. Cox, M. F. Tuite, and J. S. Weissman, 2004 Dissection and design of yeast prions. PLoS Biol. 2: e86.
56. Parham, S. N., C. G. Resende, and M. F. Tuite, 2001 Oligopeptide repeats in the yeast protein Sup35p stabilize intermolecular prion interactions. EMBO J. 20: 2111-2119.
57. Peakall, R., and P. E. Smouse, 2012 GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28: 2537-2539.
58. Piry S., A. Alapetite, J. M. Cornuet, D. Paetkau, L. Baudouin et al., 2004 GENECLASS2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J. Hered. 95: 536-539.
59. Price, M. N., P. S. Dehal, and A. P. Arkin, 2009 FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26: 1641-1650.
60. Price, M. N., P. S. Dehal, and A. P. Arkin, 2010 FastTree 2: approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5: e9490.
61. Querol, A., and U. Bond, 2009 The complex and dynamic genomes of industrial yeasts. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 293: 1-10.
62. Resende, C. G., T. F. Outeiro, L. Sands, S. Lindquist, and M. F. Tuite, 2003 Prion protein gene polymorphisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 49: 1005-1017.
63. Ross, E. D., and J. A. Toombs, 2010 The effects of amino acid composition on yeast prion formation and prion domain interactions. Prion 4: 60-65.
64. Ross, E. D., U. Baxa, and R. B. Wickner, 2004 Scrambled prion domains form prions and amyloid. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24: 7206-7213.
65. Ross, E. D., H. K. Edskes, M. J. Terry, and R. B. Wickner, 2005 Primary sequence independence for prion formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 12825-12830.
66. Rousset, F., 2008 Genepop007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Res. 8: 103-106.
67. Ruderfer, D. M., S. C. Pratt, H. S. Seidel, and L. Kruglyak, 2006 Population genomic analysis of outcrossing and recombination in yeast. Nat. Genet. 38: 1077-1081.
68. Safadi, R. A., M. Weiss-Gayet, J. Briolay, and M. Aigle, 2010 A polyploid population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with separate sexes (dioecy). FEMS Yeast Res. 10: 757-768.
69. Safadi, R. A., N. Talarek, N. Jacques, and M. Aigle, 2011 Yeast prions: Could they be exaptations? The URE2/[URE3] system in Kluyveromyces lactis. FEMS Yeast Res. 11: 151-153.
70. Sampaio, J. P., and P. Goncalves, 2008 Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and are sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 2144-2152.
71. Santoso, A., P. Chien, L. Z. Osherovich, and J. S. Weissman, 2000 Molecular basis of a yeast prion species barrier. Cell 100: 277-288.
72. Saupe, S., 2011 The [Het-s] prion of Podospora anserina and its role in heterokaryon incompatibility. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 22: 460-468.
73. Smit, G., M. H. Straver, B. J. Lugtenberg, and J. W. Kijne, 1992 Flocculence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells is induced by nutrient limitation, with cell surface hydrophobicity as a major determinant. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58: 3709-3714.
74. Smukalla, S., M. Caldara, N. Pochet, A. Beauvais, S. Guadagnini et al., 2008 FLO1 is a variable green beard gene that drives biofilm-like cooperation in budding yeast. Cell 135: 726-737.
75. Sniegowski, P. D., P. G. Dombrowski, and E. Fingerman, 2002 Sac-charomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus coexist in a natural woodland site in North America and display different levels of reproductive isolation from European conspecifics. FEMS Yeast Res. 1: 299-306.
76. Soares, E. V., and M. Mota, 1997 Quantification of yeast floccu-lation. J. Inst. Brew. 103: 93-98.
77. Spencer, J. F. T., and D. M. Spencer, 1983 Genetic improvement of industrial yeasts. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 37: 121-142.
78. Steensels, J., T. Snoek, E. Meersman, M. Picca Nicolino, E. Aslan-koohi et al., 2012 Selecting and generating superior yeasts for the brewing industry. Cerevisia 37: 63-67.
79. Stephens, M., and P. Scheet, 2005 Accounting for decay of linkage disequilibrium in haplotype inference and missing-data imputation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76: 449-462.
80. Strathern, J. N., E. W. Jones, and J. R. Broach, 1981 The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: A Life Cycle and Inheritance. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
81. Ter-Avanesyan, M. D., A. R. Dagkesamanskaya, V. V. Kushnirov, and V. N. Smirnov, 1994 The SUP35 omnipotent suppressor gene is involved in the maintenance of the non-Mendelian determinant [psi+] in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 137: 671-676.
82. Toombs, J. A., N. M. Liss, K. R. Cobble, Z. Ben-Musa, and E. D. Ross, 2011 [PSI+] maintenance is dependent on the composition, not primary sequence, of the oligopeptide repeat domain. PLoS ONE 6: e21953.
83. Toombs, J. A., M. Petri, K. R. Paul, G. Y. Kan, A. Ben-Hur et al., 2012 De novo design of synthetic prion domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 6519-6524.
84. True, H. L., and S. L. Lindquist, 2000 A yeast prion provides a mechanism for genetic variation and phenotypic diversity. Nature 407: 477-484.
85. Tsai, I. J., D. Bensasson, A. Burt, and V. Koufopanou, 2008 Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus: quantifying the life cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 4957-4962.
86. Tyedmers, J., M. L. Madariaga, and S. Lindquist, 2008 Prion switching in response to environmental stress. PLoS Biol. 6: e294.
87. Veelders, M., S. Brackner, D. Ott, C. Unverzagt, H.-U. Masch et al., 2010 Structural basis of flocculin-mediated social behavior in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 22511-22516.
88. Verstrepen, K. J., and F. M. Klis, 2006 Flocculation, adhesion and biofilm formation in yeasts. Mol. Microbiol. 60: 5-15.
89. Vitrenko, Y. A., M. E. Pavon, S. I. Stone, and S. W. Liebman, 2007 Propagation of the [PIN+] prion by fragments of Rnq1 fused to GFP. Curr. Genet. 51: 309-319.
90. Wang, Q.-M., W.-Q. Liu, G. Liti, S.-A. Wang, and F.-Y. Bai, 2012 Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cer-evisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. Mol. Ecol. 21: 5404-5417.
91. White, C., 2003 Using multiple yeast strains. Available at: http://www.whitelabs.com/content/using-multiple-yeast-strains. Accessed: October 10. 2013.
92. White, L., and M. White, 2013 White Labs Brewery Catalog. White Labs, San Diego, CA.
93. Wickner, R. B., 1994 [URE3] as an altered URE2 protein: evidence for a prion analog in S. cerevisiae. Science 264: 566-569.
94. Wickner, R. B., S. W. Liebman, and S. J. Saupe, 2004 Prions of yeast and filamentous fungi: [URE3], [PSI+], [PIN+], and [Het-s], pp. 305-372 in Prion Biology and Diseases, edited by S. B. Prusiner. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
95. Williams, E. S., M. W. Miller, T. J. Kreeger, R. H. Kahn, and E. T. Thorne, 2002 Chronic wasting disease of deer and elk: a review with recommendations for management. J. Wildl. Manag. 66: 551-563.
96. Yvert, G., S. Ohnuki, S. Nogami, Y. Imanaga, S. Fehrmann et al., 2013 Single-cell phenomics reveals intra-species variation of phenotypic noise in yeast. BMC Syst. Biol. 7: 54.
97. Zupan, J., and P. Raspor, 2008 Quantitative agar-invasion assay. J. Microbiol. Methods 73: 100-104.