Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

European Urology

Volumn 66, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 303-318

  Serati, Maurizio ^a   Bogani, Giorgio ^a   Sorice, Paola ^a   Braga, Andrea ^a   Torella, Marco ^b   Salvatore, Stefano ^c   Uccella, Stefano ^a   Cromi, Antonella ^a   Ghezzi, Fabio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^b SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

^c SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Apical prolapse; Pelvic organ prolapse (POP); Robotic; Sacral colpopexy; Sacrocolpopexy

Indexed keywords

ANORECTAL DISEASE; ANORECTAL DYSFUNCTION; COLPOTOMY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; GOLD STANDARD; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PELVIS SURGERY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETREATMENT; REVIEW; ROBOT ASSISTED SACROCOLPOPEXY; ROBOTICS; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY DYSFUNCTION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CONSTIPATION; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FEMALE; LAPAROSCOPY; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; SACRUM; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; SURGICAL MESH; URINARY INCONTINENCE; VAGINA;

CONSTIPATION; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SACRUM; SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; SURGICAL MESH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE; VAGINA;

EID: 84904071217     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.053     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. F.E. Lane Modified technique of sacral colpopexy Am J Obstet Gynecol 142 1982 933
2. C. Maher, B. Feiner, K. Baessler, and C. Schmid Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 CD004014
3. C. Maher ICI 2012: pelvic organ prolapse surgery Int Urogynecol J 24 2013 1781
4. A.L. Coolen, A.M. van Oudheusden, and H.W. van Eijndhoven et al. A comparison of complications between open abdominal sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vault prolapse Obstet Gynecol Int 2013 2013 528636
5. K.C. Hsiao, K. Latchamsetty, F.E. Govier, P. Kozlowski, and K.C. Kobashi Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse J Endourol 21 2007 926 930
6. O. Chinthakanan, J.R. Miklos, and R.D. Moore Laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy with concurrent laparoscopic myomectomy for treatment of multiple myomas: case report and literature review J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20 2013 903 906
7. R.M. Freeman, K. Pantazis, and A. Thomson et al. A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study Int Urogynecol J 24 2013 377 384
8. G. Novara, A. Galfano, S. Secco, V. Ficarra, and W. Artibani Prolapse surgery: an update Curr Opin Urol 17 2007 237 241
9. D.S. Di Marco, G.K. Chow, M.T. Gettman, and D.S. Elliott Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse Urology 63 2004 373 376
10. D.S. Elliott, G.K. Chow, and M. Gettman Current status of robotics in female urology and gynecology World J Urol 24 2006 188 192
11. M.N. Akl, J.B. Long, and D.L. Giles et al. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve Surg Endosc 23 2009 2390 2394
12. R.M. Satava Identification and reduction of surgical error using simulation Minim Invasive Ther Technol 14 2005 257 261
13. D. Mitropoulos, W. Artibani, M. Graefen, M. Remzi, M. Rouprêt, and M. Truss Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations Eur Urol 61 2012 341 349
14. G.H. Guyatt, A.D. Oxman, and G.E. Vist et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations BMJ 336 2008 924 926
15. European Association of Urology (EAU) Levels of evidence and grade of guideline recommendations 2008 EAU Arnhem, the Netherlands p. 2
16. A.D. Benson, B.A. Kramer, R.O. Wayment, and B.F. Schwartz Supracervical robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse JSLS 14 2010 525 530
17. E. Xylinas, I. Ouzaid, and X. Durand et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: initial experience in a high-volume laparoscopic reference center J Endourol 24 2010 1985 1989
18. S.S. Chan, S.M. Pang, T.H. Cheung, R.Y. Cheung, and T.K. Chung Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance Hong Kong Med J 17 2011 54 60
19. J. Moreno Sierra, E. Ortiz Oshiro, and C. Fernandez Pérez et al. Long-term outcomes after robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: prospective analysis Urol Int 86 2011 414 418
20. M.F. Paraiso, J.E. Jelovsek, A. Frick, C.C. Chen, and M.D. Barber Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 118 2011 1005 1013
21. J. Tan-Kim, S.A. Menefee, K.M. Luber, C.W. Nager, and E.S. Lukacz Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparing operative times, costs and outcomes Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 17 2011 44 49
22. D.D. Antosh, S.A. Grotzke, and M.A. McDonald et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18 2012 158 161
23. S.A. Collins, P.K. Tulikangas, and D.M. O'Sullivan Effect of surgical approach on physical activity and pain control after sacral colpopexy Am J Obstet Gynecol 206 2012 438.e1-6
24. C.S. Elliott, M.H. Hsieh, E.R. Sokol, C.V. Comiter, C.K. Payne, and B. Chen Robot-assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost-minimization analysis J Urol 187 2012 638 643
25. A. Göçmen, F. SanlIkan, and M.G. Uçar Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience Arch Gynecol Obstet 285 2012 683 688
26. L. Hoyte, R. Rabbanifard, J. Mezzich, R. Bassaly, and K. Downes Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18 2012 335 339
27. C.A. Matthews, A. Carroll, A. Hill, V. Ramakrishnan, and E.J. Gill Prospective evaluation of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy and sacrocervicopexy for the management of apical pelvic support defects South Med J 105 2012 274 278
28. S.L. Mourik, J.E. Martens, and M. Aktas Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 165 2012 122 127
29. B.C. Osmundsen, A. Clark, and C. Goldsmith et al. Mesh erosion in robotic sacrocolpopexy Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18 2012 86 88
30. J. Seror, D.R. Yates, and E. Seringe et al. Prospective comparison of short-term functional outcomes obtained after pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy World J Urol 30 2012 393 398
31. N.Y. Siddiqui, E.J. Geller, and A.G. Visco Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy Am J Obstet Gynecol 206 2012 435.e1-5
32. N. Awad, S. Mustafa, A. Amit, M. Deutsch, J. Eldor-Itskovitz, and L. Lowenstein Implementation of a new procedure: laparoscopic versus robotic sacrocolpopexy Arch Gynecol Obstet 287 2013 1181 1186
33. M.A. Bedaiwy, M. Abdelrahman, and S. Deter et al. The impact of training residents on the outcome of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy Minim Invasive Surg 2012 2012 289342
34. M. Belsante, S. Murray, B. Dillon, and P. Zimmern Mid term outcome of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy Can J Urol 20 2013 6656 6661
35. M.A. Borahay, T. Oge, T.M. Walsh, P.R. Patel, A.M. Rodriguez, and G.S. Kilic Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy using barbed delayed absorbable sutures J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21 2014 412 416
36. A.K. Crane, E.J. Geller, and C.A. Matthews Outlet constipation 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant posterior repair South Med J 106 2013 409 414
37. P.J. Culligan, E. Gurshumov, and C. Lewis et al. Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using a lightweight Y-mesh Int Urogynecol J 25 2014 731 735
38. A. Germain, F. Thibault, and M. Galifet et al. Long-term outcomes after totally robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse Surg Endosc 27 2013 525 529
39. C. Louis-Sylvestre, and M. Herry Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for stage III pelvic organ prolapse Int Urogynecol J 24 2013 731 733
40. A. Ploumidis, A.F. Spinoit, and G. de Naeyer et al. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution Eur Urol 65 2014 138 145
41. F. Ghezzi, S. Uccella, and A. Cromi et al. Surgical treatment for pelvic floor disorders in women 75 years or older: a single-center experience Menopause 18 2011 314 318
42. E.J. Geller, F.C. Lin, and C.A. Matthews Analysis of robotic performance times to improve operative efficiency J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20 2013 43 48