Effect of surgical approach on physical activity and pain control after sacral colpopexy

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 206, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 438.e1-438.e6

  Collins, Sarah A ^a   Tulikangas, Paul K ^a   O'Sullivan, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

accelerometer; postoperative pain control; postoperative recovery; Short Form 36

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ADULT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SACRAL COLPOPEXY; SHORT FORM 36; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84860264037     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: 10976868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.036     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. M.J. Loos, M.R. Scheltinga, L.G. Mulders, R.M. Roumen The Pfannenstiel incision as a source of chronic pain Obstet Gynecol 111 2008 839 846
2. M.F. Paraiso, J.E. Jelovsek, A. Frick, C.C.G. Chen, M.D. Barber Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 118 2011 1005 1013
3. M.F. Paraiso, M.D. Walters, R.R. Rackley, S. Melek, C. Hugney Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study Am J Obstet Gynecol 192 2005 1752 1758
4. M. Patel, D. O'Sullivan, P.K. Tulikangas A comparison of costs for abdominal, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted sacral colpopexy Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20 2009 223 228
5. M. Rosen, A. Garcia-Ruiz, J. Malm, J.T. Mayes, E. Steiger, J. Ponsky Laparoscopic hernia repair enhances early return of physical work capacity Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11 2001 28 33
6. Y. Inoue, T. Kimura, S. Fujita A new parameter for assessing postoperative recovery of physical activity using an accelerometer Surg Today 33 2003 645 650
7. Y. Inoue, T. Kimura, H. Noro Is laparoscopic colorectal surgery less invasive than classical open surgery? Quantitation of physical activity using an accelerometer to assess postoperative convalescence Surg Endosc 17 2003 1269 1273
8. S.M. Patterson, D.S. Krantz, L.C. Montgomery, P.A. Duester, S.M. Hedges, L.E. Nebel Automated physical activity monitoring: validation and comparison with physiological and self-report measures Psychophysiology 30 1993 296 305
9. T. Bisgaard, M. Kjaersgaard, A. Bernhard, H. Kehlet, J. Rosenberg Computerized monitoring of physical activity and sleep in postoperative abdominal surgery patients J Clin Monit Comput 15 1999 1 8
10. J.E. Ware Jr SF-36 health survey update www.sf-36.org/tools/SF36.shtml Accessed Oct. 30, 2008.
11. K.D. Wasowicz-Kemps, S.M. Slootmaker, H.M.C. Kemps, I.H.M. Borel-Rinkes, D.H. Biesma, B. van Ramshorst Resumption of daily physical activity after day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 23 2009 2034 2040
12. A. Holzer, S.T. Jirecek, U.M. Illievich, J. Huber, R.J. Wenzl Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy: a double-blind study to evaluate postoperative pain Anesth Analg 102 2006 1480 1484
13. S. Ozalevli, A. Ozden, O. Itil, A. Akkoclu comparison of the sit-to-stand test with 6 min walk test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Respir Med 191 2007 286 293
14. N.A. Ali, J.M. O'Brien, S.P. Hoffmann Acquired weakness, handgrip strength, and mortality in critically ill patients Am J Respir Crit Care Med 178 2008 261 268
15. H.J. Montoye The Harvard step test and work capacity Rev Can Biol 11 1953 491 499