Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy

Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 335-339

  Hoyte, Lennox ^a   Rabbanifard, Roshanak ^a   Mezzich, Jennifer ^a   Bassaly, Renee ^a   Downes, Katheryne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Length of stay; Prolapse; Robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy; Sacrocolpopexy; Surgical costs

Indexed keywords

COST ACCOUNTING; COSTS; SURGERY;

2-GROUP; 24 HOURS; COST ANALYSIS; DIRECT COSTS; LEARNING CURVES; LENGTH OF STAY; PROLAPSE; ROBOTIC-ASSISTED SACROCOLPOPEXY; SACROCOLPOPEXY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDY DESIGN;

ROBOTICS;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; METHODOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTICS; STATISTICS; SUTURING METHOD; UTERUS PROLAPSE;

COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; PATIENT READMISSION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; UTERINE PROLAPSE;

EID: 84872246490     PISSN: 21518378     EISSN: 21544212     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318270ade3     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112(6):1201-126.
2. Payne TN, Dauterive FR. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15(3):286-291.
3. Judd JP, Siddiqui NY, Barnett JC, et al. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17(4):493-499.
4. Timmons MC, Addison WA, Addison SB, et al. Abdominal sacral colpopexy in 163 women with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele. Evolution of operative techniques. J Reprod Med 1992;37(4):323-327.
5. Addison WA, Livengood CH 3rd, Sutton GP, et al. Abdominal sacral colpopexy with Mersilene mesh in the retroperitoneal position in the management of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;153(2):140-146.
6. Stubbs J. Short-term results of robotic sacrocolpopexy using the Quill SRS bi-directional polydioxanone (PDO) suture. J Robot Surg 2011;5:259-265.
7. Maglinte DD, Bartram CI, Hale DA, et al. Functional imaging of the pelvic floor. Radiology 2011;258(1):23-39.
8. Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118(5):1005-1013.
9. Elliott CS, Hsieh MH, Sokol ER, et al. Robot-assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost-minimization analysis. J Urol 2012;187(2):638-643.
10. Patel M, O'Sullivan D, Tulikangas PK. A comparison of costs for abdominal, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted sacral colpopexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20(2):223-228.