Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: A randomized controlled trial

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1005-1013

  Paraiso, Marie Fidela R ^a   Jelovsek, J Eric ^a   Frick, Anna ^a   Chen, Chi Chung Grace ^a   Barber, Matthew D ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOTICS; SACROCOLPOPEXY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SUTURING METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ROBOTICS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TIME FACTORS; UTERINE PROLAPSE;

EID: 80054943493     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318231537c     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:501-6. (Pubitemid 27133519)
2. Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS. Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:646-51. (Pubitemid 32907461)
3. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly AM, Cundiff G, Weber AM, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:805-23. (Pubitemid 40458813)
4. Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn 2008;27: 3-12.
5. Cosson M, Rajabally R, Bogaert E, Querleu D, Crepin G. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, hysterectomy, and burch colposuspension: feasibility and short-term complications of 77 procedures. JSLS 2002;6:115-9.
6. Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Nezhat C. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84: 885-8. (Pubitemid 24329865)
7. Ostrzenski A. Laparoscopic colposuspension for total vaginal prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996;55:147-52. (Pubitemid 26383742)
8. Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR, Melek S, Hugney C. Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1752-8.
9. Klauschie JL, Suozzi BA, O'Brien MM, McBride AW. A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20:273-9.
10. Hsiao KC, Latchamsetty K, Govier FE, Kozlowski P, Kobashi KC. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. J Endourol 2007;21:926-30. (Pubitemid 47443688)
11. Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1201-6.
12. Reza M, Maeso S, Blasco JA, Andradas E. Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Br J Surg 2010;97:1772-83.
13. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:10-7. (Pubitemid 26282199)
14. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:103-13. (Pubitemid 40991834)
15. Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1388-95. (Pubitemid 33145058)
16. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003;14:164-8; discussion 168. (Pubitemid 41490366)
17. McCarthyMJr, Jonasson O, Chang CH, Pickard AS, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gibbs J, et al. Assessment of patient functional status after surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:171-8. (Pubitemid 40994948)
18. Elliott DS, Frank I, DiMarco DS, Chow GK. Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Surg 2004;188(suppl):52S-6S. (Pubitemid 39336473)
19. Brown MB. A test for the difference between two treatments in a continuous measure of outcome when there are dropouts. Control Clin Trials 1992;13:213-25.
20. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs-the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:701-4.
21. Shukla PJ, Scherr DS, Milsom JW. Robot-assisted surgery and health care costs. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2174; author reply 2176.
22. Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA, Luber KM, Nager CW, Lukacz ES. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparing operative times, costs, and outcomes. Female Pelv Med Reconst Surg 2011;17:44-9.
23. Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 2002;60:39-45; discussion 45. (Pubitemid 34722942)
24. Chandra V, Nehra D, Parent R, Woo R, Reyes R, Hernandez-Boussard T, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Surgery 2010;147:830-9.
25. Patel M, O'Sullivan D, Tulikangas PK. A comparison of costs for abdominal, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted sacral colpopexy. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20: 223-8.
26. Judd JP, Siddiqui NY, Barnett JC, Visco AG, Havrilesky LJ, Wu JM. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:493-9.