Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy using barbed delayed absorbable sutures

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 412-416

  Borahay, Mostafa A ^a   Oge, Tufan ^b   Walsh, Teresa M ^a   Patel, Pooja R ^a   Rodriguez, Ana M ^a   Kilic, Gokhan Sami ^a  

^a University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

^b OSMANGAZI UNIVERSITY MEDICAL FACULTY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Barbed suture; Robotic; Sacrocolpopexy

Indexed keywords

POLITEF;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER LACERATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CYSTOCELE; DELAYED EXTUBATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; ILEUS; INCISIONAL HERNIA; INTESTINE SURGERY; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MESH EROSION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POLYPROPYLENE SUTURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTIC SACROCOLPOPEXY; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SUBURETHRAL SLING; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL MESH; SURGICAL PATIENT; TRANSOBTURATOR TAPE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINE INCONTINENCE; VAGINA RECONSTRUCTION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; COHORT ANALYSIS; DEVICES; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECURRENT DISEASE; ROBOTICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SUTURE; SUTURING METHOD; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; CYSTOCELE; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RECURRENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SUTURES; TEXAS;

EID: 84899647737     PISSN: 15534650     EISSN: 15534669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Vincent G.K., Velkoff V.A. The Next Four Decades: The Older Population in the United States: 2010 to 2050. Current Population Reports 2010, 25-1138. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.
2. Boyles S.H., Weber A.M., Meyn L. Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 188:108-115.
3. Miranne J.M., Lopes V., Carberry C.L., et al. The effect of pelvic organ prolapse severity on improvement in overactive bladder symptoms after pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J 2013, 24:1303-1308.
4. Maher C., Baessler K., Glazener C.M., et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, 3:CD004014.
5. Maher C., Feiner B., Baessler K., et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, 4:CD004014.
6. Mueller E.R. Why complex pelvic organ prolapse should be approached abdominally. Curr Opin Urol 2013, 23:317-322.
7. Walsh T.M., Borahay M.A., Fox K.A., et al. Robotic-assisted, ultrasound-guided abdominal cerclage during pregnancy: overcoming minimally invasive surgery limitations?. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013, 20:398-400.
8. Kilic G.S., Moore G., Elbatanony A., et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of total laparoscopic and robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign pathology during introduction of a robotic program. Obstet Gynecol Int 2011, 2011:683703.
9. Geller E.J., Parnell B.A., Dunivan G.C. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes. Urology 2012, 79:532-536.
10. Greenberg J.A., Einarsson J.I. The use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008, 15:621-623.
11. Sendag F.A., Akman L. Use of unidirectional barbed suture in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. J Turk Soc Obstet Gynecol 2013, 10:193-196.
12. Angioli R., Plotti F., Montera R., et al. A new type of absorbable barbed suture for use in laparoscopic myomectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2012, 117:220-223.
13. Einarsson J.I., Cohen S.L., Gobern J.M., et al. Barbed versus standard suture: a randomized trial for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013, 20:492-498.
14. Nawfal A.K., Eisenstein D., Theoharis E., et al. Vaginal cuff closure during robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparing vicryl to barbed sutures. JSLS 2012, 16:525-529.
15. Alessandri F., Remorgida V., Venturini P.L., et al. Unidirectional barbed suture versus continuous suture with intracorporeal knots in laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010, 17:725-729.
16. Baden W.F., Walker T.A. Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1972, 15:1048-1054.
17. Brubaker L., Nygaard I., Richter H.E., et al. Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2008, 112:49-55.
18. Nygaard I., Brubaker L., Zyczynski H.M., et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA 2013, 309:2016-2024.
19. Kilic G.S., Alanbay I., Onol F.F. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of uterine and vaginal vault prolapse. Robotic Surgery: Practical Examples in Gynecology 2014, 327-347. Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin. G.S. Kilic, A.K. Ertan, M.F. Kose (Eds.).
20. Shepherd J.P., Higdon H.L., Stanford E.J., et al. Effect of suture selection on the rate of suture or mesh erosion and surgery failure in abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2010, 16:229-233.
21. Siddiqui N.Y., Geller E.J., Visco A.G. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012, 206:435.e1-435.e5.
22. Shveiky D., Iglesia C.B., Sokol A.I., et al. Robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal colpopexy with mesh: choosing the right surgery for anterior and apical prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2010, 16:121-127.
23. Tan-Kim J., Menefee S.A., Luber K.M., et al. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparing operative times, costs and outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2011, 17:44-49.
24. Paraiso M.F., Jelovsek J.E., Frick A., et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011, 118:1005-1013.
25. Einarsson J.I., Chavan N.R., Suzuki Y., et al. Use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: evaluation of perioperative outcomes, safety, and efficacy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011, 18:92-95.