Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy

Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 158-161

  Antosh, Danielle D ^a   Grotzke, Stephanie A ^a   McDonald, Marcela A ^a   Shveiky, David ^a   Park, Amy J ^a   Gutman, Robert E ^a   Sokol, Andrew I ^a  

^a WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic; Outcome; Robotic; Sacral colpopexy

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; CURING; HOSPITALS; LAPAROSCOPY;

BLOOD LOSS; COHORT STUDIES; CURE RATE; LAPAROSCOPIC; OUTCOME; SACRAL COLPOPEXY; SET-UP TIME; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE;

ROBOTICS;

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTICS; TIME;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84860878044     PISSN: 21518378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31824b218d     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacral colpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:805-823. (Pubitemid 40458813)
2. Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR, et al. Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1752-1758.
3. Klauschie JL, Suozzi BA, O'Brien MM, et al. A comparison of laparosocpic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective and perioperative differences. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20:273-279.
4. Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for the treatment of high grade vagina vault prolapse. J Urol 2006;176:655-659. (Pubitemid 43927873)
5. Rozet F, Mandron E, Arroyo C, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy approach for genito-urinary prolapse: experience with 363 cases. Eur Urol 2005;47:230-236. (Pubitemid 40126984)
6. Agarwala N, Hasiak N, Shade M. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with Gynemesh as graft materialVexperience and results. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:577-583. (Pubitemid 47369686)
7. Cosson M, Rajabally R, Bogaert E, et al. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy, hysterectomy, and burch colposuspension: feasibility and short-term complications of 7 procedures. JSLS 2002;6:115-119.
8. Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, et al. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacral colpopexy compared with abdominal sacral colpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:1201-1206.
9. Weber AM, Abrams P, Brubaker L, et al. The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J 2001;12:178-186. (Pubitemid 32611453)
10. Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118(5):1005-1013.
11. Daneshgari F, Kefer JC, Moore C, et al. Robotic abdominal sacral colpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolapse (POP): utilizing POP-quantificationYbased staging and outcomes. BJU Int 2007;100:875-879. (Pubitemid 47360195)