Assessment of the reliability of standard automated perimetry in regions of glaucomatous damage

Ophthalmology

Volumn 121, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1359-1369

  Gardiner, Stuart K ^a   Swanson, William H ^b   Goren, Deborah ^a   Mansberger, Steven L ^a   Demirel, Shaban ^a  

^a DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RELIABILITY; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; STANDARD;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 84903821196     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: 15494713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.020     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. P.H. Artes, D.M. Hutchison, and M.T. Nicolela et al. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 2005 2451 2457 (Pubitemid 43119493)
2. E.Z. Blumenthal, P.A. Sample, and C.C. Berry et al. Evaluating several sources of variability for standard and SWAP visual fields in glaucoma patients, suspects, and normals Ophthalmology 110 2000 1895 1902 (Pubitemid 37163302)
3. B.C. Chauhan, and P.H. House Intratest variability in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry Ophthalmology 98 1991 79 83
4. S.K. Gardiner, C.A. Johnson, and S. Demirel The effect of test variability on the structure-function relationship in early glaucoma Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 250 2012 1851 1861
5. L.B. Gilpin, W.C. Stewart, H.H. Hunt, and C.D. Broom Threshold variability using different Goldmann stimulus sizes Acta Ophthalmol 68 1990 674 676
6. A. Heijl, G. Lindgren, and J. Olsson Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field Arch Ophthalmol 105 1987 1544 1549 (Pubitemid 17153246)
7. A. Heijl, A. Lindgren, and G. Lindgren Testretest variability in glaucomatous visual fields Am J Ophthalmol 108 1989 130 135 (Pubitemid 19197944)
8. D.B. Henson, S. Chaudry, and P.H. Artes et al. Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 2000 417 421 (Pubitemid 30080444)
9. H.D. Jampel, S. Vitale, and Y. Ding et al. Test-retest variability in structural and functional parameters of glaucoma damage in the Glaucoma Imaging Longitudinal Study J Glaucoma 15 2006 152 157
10. J.R. Piltz, and R.J. Starita Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields [letter] Am J Ophthalmol 109 1990 109 110 (Pubitemid 20026511)
11. P.G. Spry, C.A. Johnson, A.M. McKendrick, and A. Turpin Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42 2001 1404 1410 (Pubitemid 32381988)
12. M. Wall, K.R. Woodward, C.K. Doyle, and P.H. Artes Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix and motion perimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50 2008 974 979
13. S.K. Gardiner, and D.P. Crabb Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression Br J Ophthalmol 86 2002 560 564 (Pubitemid 34454504)
14. S.K. Gardiner, S. Demirel, C.G. De Moraes Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group Series length used during trend analysis affects sensitivity to changes in progression rate in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54 2013 1252 1259
15. J. Katz, D. Gilbert, H.A. Quigley, and A. Sommer Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma Ophthalmology 104 1997 1017 1025 (Pubitemid 27255415)
16. K. Nouri-Mahdavi, L. Brigatti, M. Weitzman, and J. Caprioli Comparison of methods to detect visual field progression in glaucoma Ophthalmology 104 1997 1228 1236 (Pubitemid 28048718)
17. B.C. Chauhan, D.F. Garway-Heath, and F.J. Goni et al. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma Br J Ophthalmol 92 2008 569 573 (Pubitemid 351497993)
18. J.L. Keltner, C.A. Johnson, J.M. Quigg Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group Confirmation of visual field abnormalities in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Arch Ophthalmol 118 2000 1187 1194
19. S.K. Gardiner, W.H. Swanson, and S. Demirel et al. A two-stage neural spiking model of visual contrast detection in perimetry Vision Res 48 2008 1859 1869
20. B. Bengtsson, J. Olsson, A. Heijl, and H. Rootzen A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75 1997 368 375 (Pubitemid 27470462)
21. M. Wall, K.R. Woodward, C.K. Doyle, and G. Zamba The effective dynamic ranges of standard automated perimetry sizes III and V and motion and matrix perimetry Arch Ophthalmol 128 2010 570 576
22. B.C. Chauhan, and C.A. Johnson Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40 1999 648 656 (Pubitemid 29109443)
23. E. Kaplan, and R.M. Shapley The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83 1986 2755 2757 (Pubitemid 16026963)
24. W.H. Swanson, H. Sun, B.B. Lee, and D. Cao Responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to perimetric stimuli Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52 2011 764 771
25. K.A. Johnson, and R.S. Goody The original Michaelis constant: translation of the 1913 Michaelis-Menten paper Biochemistry 50 2011 8264 8269
26. D.A. Baylor, A.L. Hodgkin, and T.D. Lamb Reconstruction of the electrical responses of turtle cones to flashes and steps of light J Physiol 242 1974 759 791
27. A.L. Hodgkin, and A.F. Huxley A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve J Physiol 117 1952 500 544
28. D. Pelli Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination J Opt Soc Am A 2 1985 1508 1531
29. D. Laming, and J.F. Laming Hegelmaier: on memory for the length of a line Psychol Res 54 1992 233 239
30. A. Turpin, P.H. Artes, and A.M. McKendrick The Open Perimetry Interface: an enabling tool for clinical visual psychophysics J Vis [serial online] 12 2012 22 1-5. Available at http://www.journalofvision.org/content/12/11/22.long Accessed January 4, 2014
31. K.Y. Liang, and S.K. Zeger Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models Biometrika 73 1986 13 22
32. J. Caprioli, D. Mock, and E. Bitrian et al. A method to measure and predict rates of regional visual field decay in glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52 2011 4765 4773
33. R.A. Russell, and D.P. Crabb On alternative methods for measuring visual field decay: Tobit linear regression [letter] Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52 2011 9539 9540
34. J. Caprioli, D. Mock, and E. Bitrian et al. Author response: on alternative methods for measuring visual field decay: Tobit linear regression Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53 2012 118
35. D. Hood, and R. Kardon A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage Prog Retin Eye Res 26 2007 688 710 (Pubitemid 47615565)
36. R.S. Harwerth, J.L. Wheat, M.J. Fredette, and D.R. Anderson Linking structure and function in glaucoma Prog Retin Eye Res 29 2010 249 271
37. M.O. Gordon, M.A. Kass, and Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants Arch Ophthalmol 117 1999 573 583 (Pubitemid 29218422)
38. J. Tabernero, A. Ohlendorf, and M.D. Fischer et al. Peripheral refraction profiles in subjects with low foveal refractive errors [report online] Optom Vis Sci 88 2011 E388 E394
39. P.W. de Waard, J.K. IJspeert, T.J. van den Berg, and P.T. de Jong Intraocular light scattering in age-related cataracts Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33 1992 618 625
40. E.B. Werner, and S.M. Drance Increased scatter of responses as a precursor of visual field changes in glaucoma Can J Ophthalmol 12 1977 140 142 (Pubitemid 8106196)
41. S.K. Gardiner, D.P. Crabb, F.W. Fitzke, and R.A. Hitchings Reducing noise in suspected glaucomatous visual fields by using a new spatial filter Vision Res 44 2004 839 848 (Pubitemid 38210280)
42. A. Turpin, A.M. McKendrick, C.A. Johnson, and A.J. Vingrys Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 2003 4787 4795 (Pubitemid 37315292)
43. R. Malik, W.H. Swanson, and D.F. Garway-Heath Development and evaluation of a linear staircase strategy for the measurement of perimetric sensitivity Vision Res 46 2006 2956 2967 (Pubitemid 43929047)
44. A. Hot, M.W. Dul, and W.H. Swanson Development and evaluation of a contrast sensitivity perimetry test for patients with glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49 2008 3049 3057
45. A.J. Weber, and C.D. Harman Structure-function relations of parasol cells in the normal and glaucomatous primate retina Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46 2005 3197 3207 (Pubitemid 44264305)
46. B. Fortune, C.F. Burgoyne, and G.A. Cull et al. Structural and functional abnormalities of retinal ganglion cells measured in vivo at the onset of optic nerve head surface change in experimental glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53 2012 3939 3950