The effective dynamic ranges of standard automated perimetry sizes III and V and motion and matrix perimetry

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 128, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 570-576

  Wall, Michael ^a,b   Woodward, Kimberly R ^b   Doyle, Carrie K ^b   Zamba, Gideon ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTION; PERIMETER; PERIMETRY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; PERIMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 77952143864     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: 15383601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.71     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108(2):130-135. (Pubitemid 19197944)
2. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G, Patella M. Inter-test threshold variability in glaucoma: importance of censored observations and general field estimate. In: Mills RP, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update 1988/89. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kugler; 1989:313-324.
3. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, SITA standard, and SITA fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(8):2654-2659.
4. Nakayama K, Tyler CW. Psychophysical isolation of movement sensitivity by removal of familiar position cues. Vision Res. 1981;21(4):427-433.
5. Wall M, Montgomery EB. Using motion perimetry to detect visual field defects in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry. Neurology. 1995;45(6):1169-1175.
6. Wall M, Ketoff KM. Random dot motion perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120(5):587-596.
7. Wall M, Brito C, Kutzko K. Motion perimetry: properties and results. Presented at: The Perimetry Update 1996/1997, Proceedings of the Xth International Perimetric Society Meeting; Wurzburg, Germany; 1997;21-33.
8. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003;16(2):213-225.
9. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA, Fingeret M, et al. Characteristics of the normative database for the Humphrey matrix perimeter. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(4):1540-1548.
10. Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, Kardon RH. Structure versus function in glaucoma: an application of a linear model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(8):3662-3668.