Relationship of feeds protein structural makeup in common Prairie feeds with protein solubility, in situ ruminal degradation and intestinal digestibility

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 194, Issue , 2014, Pages 58-70

  Peng, Quanhui ^a,b   Khan, Nazir A ^a   Wang, Zhisheng ^b   Yu, Peiqiang ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b SICHUAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c TIANJIN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Molecular spectroscopy; Protein molecular structure; Protein solubility; Rumen degradability

Indexed keywords

BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS; BOS; BRASSICA NAPUS; BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS; GLYCINE MAX; HORDEUM; LENS CULINARIS; PISUM SATIVUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84903817823     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AOAC Officials Methods of Analysis 1990, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA. 15th ed.
2. Calsamiglia S., Stern M.D., Firkins J.L. A three-step in vitro procedure for estimating intestinal digestion of protein in ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73:1459-1465.
3. Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals 1993, Vol. 1. Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, ON, Canada. second ed.
4. Crooker B.A., Clark J.H., Shanks R.D., Hatfield E.E. Effects of formaldehyde treated soybean meal on milk yield, milk composition, and nutrient digestibility in the dairy cow. J. Dairy Sci. 1983, 66:492-504.
5. Damiran D., Yu P. Structural makeup, biopolymer conformation, and biodegradation characteristics of a newly developed super genotype of oats (CDC SO-I versus conventional varieties): a novel approach. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58:2377-2387.
6. Damiran D., Yu P. Molecular basis of structural makeup of hulless barley in relation to rumen degradation kinetics and intestinal availability in dairy cattle: a novel approach. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:5151-5159.
7. Doiron K., Yu P., McKinnon J.J., Christensen D.A. Heat-induced protein structure and subfractions in relation to protein degradation kinetics and intestinal availability in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:3319-3330.
8. Gamage I.H., Jonker A., Christensen D.A., Yu P. Metabolic characteristics of proteins and biomolecular spectroscopic profiles in different batches of feedstock (wheat) and their co-products (wheat dried distillers grains with solubles) from the same bioethanol processing plant. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:6695-6715.
9. Habib G., Khan N.A., Ali M., Bezabih M. In situ ruminal crude protein degradability of cereal grains, oilseeds and animal byproduct based protein feedstuffs. Livest. Sci. 2013, 153:81-87.
10. Liu B., Thacker P., Yu P. In-depth study of the protein molecular structures of different types of dried distillers grains with solubles and their relationship to digestive characteristics. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93:1438-1448.
11. Liu N., Yu P. Using DRIFT molecular spectroscopy with uni- and multivariate spectral techniques to detect protein molecular structure differences among different genotypes of barley. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58:6264-6269.
12. Liu N., Yu P. Application of advanced synchrotron radiation-based and conventional techniques in recent research on molecular structure, metabolic characteristics, and nutrition in coproducts from biofuel processing. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2013, 48:589-608.
13. Ljøkjel K., Harstad O.M., Skrede A. Effect of heat treatment of soybean meal and fish meal on amino acid digestibility in mink and dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2000, 84:83-95.
14. McAllister T.A., Phillippe R.C., Rode L.M., Cheng K.J. Effect of the protein matrix on the digestion of cereal grains by ruminal microorganisms. J. Anim. Sci. 1993, 71:205-212.
15. National Research Council Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle 2001, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC. seventh ed. (revised).
16. Nuez-Ortín W.G., Yu P. Effects of bioethanol plant and coproduct type on the metabolic characteristics of the proteins in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:3775-3783.
17. Peng Q., Khan N.A., Wang Z., Yu P. Moist and dry heating-induced changes in protein molecular structure, protein subfractions, and nutrient profiles in camelina seeds. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 97:446-457.
18. Roe M.B., Sniffen C.J., Chase L.E. Techniques for measuring protein fractions in feedstuffs. Proc. Cornell Nutrition Conf. 1990, 81-85. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
19. Samadi, Yu P. Dry and moist heating-induced changes in protein molecular structure, protein subfraction, and nutrient profiles in soybeans. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:6092-6102.
20. SAS User Guide: Statistics. Version 9.2 2003, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
21. Saxton A.M. A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings. Proc. 23rd SAS User Group Int. 1998, 1243-1246. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
22. Stuart B.H. Infrared Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Applications 2004, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
23. Theodoridou K., Yu P. Application potential of ATR-FT/IR molecular spectroscopy in animal nutrition: revelation of protein molecular structures of canola meal and presscake, as affected by heat-processing methods, in relationship with their protein digestive behavior and utilization for dairy cattle. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61:5449-5458.
24. Van Duinkerken G., Blok M.C., Bannink A., Cone J.W., Dijkstra J., Van Vuuren A.M., Tamminga S. Update of the Dutch protein evaluation system for ruminants: the DVE/OEB2010 system. J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 149:351-367.
25. Yu P. Application of advanced synchrotron radiation-based Fourier transform infrared (SR-FTIR) microspectroscopy to animal nutrition and feed science: a novel approach. Br. J. Nutr. 2004, 92:869-885.
26. Yu P. Application of cluster analysis (CLA) in feed chemical imaging to accurately reveal structural chemical features of feeds and plants within cellular dimension. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53:2872-2880.
27. Yu P. Protein secondary structures (α-helix and β-sheet) at a cellular level and protein fractions in relation to rumen degradation behaviours of protein: a new approach. Br. J. Nutr. 2005, 94:655-665.
28. Yu P., Damiran D., Azarfar A., Niu Z. Detecting molecular features of spectra mainly associated with structural and non-structural carbohydrates in co-products from bioethanol production using DRIFT with uni- and multivariate molecular spectral analyses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12:1921-1935.
29. Yu P., Doiron K., Liu D. Shining light on the differences in molecular structural chemical makeup and the cause of distinct degradation behavior between malting- and feed-type barley using synchrotron FTIR microspectroscopy: a novel approach. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56:3417-3426.
30. Yu P., McKinnon J.J., Christensen C.R., Christensen D.A. Using synchrotron transmission FTIR microspectroscopy as a rapid, direct, and nondestructive analytical technique to reveal molecular microstructural-chemical features within tissue in grain barley. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52:1484-1494.
31. Yu P., Nuez-Ortín W.G. Relationship of protein molecular structure to metabolisable proteins in different types of dried distillers grains with solubles: a novel approach. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 104:1429-1437.
32. Zhang X., Yu P. Using ATR-FT/IR molecular spectroscopy to detect effects of blend DDGS inclusion level on the molecular structure spectral and metabolic characteristics of the proteins in hulless barley. Spectrochim. Acta, A: Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2012, 95:53-63.
33. Zhang X., Yu P. Molecular basis of protein structure in combined feeds (hulless barley with bioethanol coproduct of wheat dried distillers grains with solubles) in relation to protein rumen degradation kinetics and intestinal availability in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:3363-3379.