Language testing and English as an international language: Constraints and contributions

Australian Review of Applied Linguistics

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2008, Pages

  Elder, Catherine ^a   Harding, Luke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903751739     PISSN: 01550640     EISSN: 18337139     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2104/aral0834     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Berry, V. (2007). Ethical considerations when assessing oral proficiency in pairs. In A. Huhta, V. Kohonen, L. Kurki-Suonio and S. Luoma (Eds), Current developments and alternatives in language assessment-Proceedings of LTRC 96 (pp. 107-123). Jyväskalä: University of Jyväskalä and University of Tampere.
2. Brooks, L. (2009). Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co-constructing a better performance. Language Testing, 26 (3), 341-366.
3. Brown, A.; Lumley, T. (1998). Linguistic and cultural norms in language testing: A case study. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 7 (1), 80-96.
4. Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3, 229-242.
5. Chapelle, C. A.; Enright, M. K.; Jamieson, J. M. (Eds) (2008). Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. New York: Routledge.
6. Davis, L. (2009). The influence of interlocutor proficiency in a paired oral assessment. Language Testing, 26 (3), 367-396.
7. Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Ducasse, A.; Brown, A. (2009). Assessing paired orals: Raters' orientation to interaction. Language Testing, 26 (3), 423-444.
9. Elder, C.; Davies, A. (2006). Assessing English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 282-304.
10. Graddol, D. (1997). The future of English? A guide to forecasting the popularity of the English language in the 21st century. London: British Council.
11. Harding, L. (2008). The use of speakers with L2 accents in academic English listening assessment: A validation study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Melbourne.
12. He, D.; Li, D. (2009). Language attitudes and linguistic features in the China English debate. World Englishes, 28 (1), 70-89.
13. Hill, K. (1996). Who should be the judge? The use of non-native speakers as raters on a test of English as an international language. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 5 (2), 29-50.
14. Iwashita, N. (1998). The validity of the paired interview format in oral performance assessment. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 5 (2), 51-65.
15. Jenkins, J. (2006). The spread of EIL: A testing time for testers. ELT Journal, 60 (1), 42-50.
16. Jenkins, J. (2007). English as a lingua franca: attitude and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Kim, Y. (2009). An investigation into native and non-native teachers' judgments of oral English performance: A mixed methods approach. Language Testing, 26 (2), 187-217.
18. Llurda, E. (2004). Non-native-speaker teachers and English as an International Language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14 (3), 314-323.
19. Lazaraton, A. (2005). Non-native speakers as language assessors: Recent research and implications for assessment practice. Paper presented at the BAAL, Bristol.
20. Lowenberg, P. (2002). Assessing English proficiency in the Expanding Circle. World Englishes, 21 (3), 431-435.
21. Lumley, T.; Qian, D. (2003). Assessing English for employment in Hong Kong. In C. A. Coombe and N. Hubley (Eds), Assessment practices: Case studies in TESOL. Practice Series (pp. 135-147). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
22. Macqueen, S.; Harding, L. (2009). Review of the Certificate of Proficiency in English (CPE) Speaking test. Language Testing, 26 (3), 467-476.
23. Major, R. C., Fitzmaurice, S. F., Bunta, F., & Balasubramanian, C. (2002). The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 36 (2), 173-190.
24. Major, R. C.; Fitzmaurice, S. F.; Bunta, F.; Balasubramanian, C. (2005). Testing the effects of regional, ethnic and international dialects of English on listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55 (1), 37-69.
25. May, L. (2009). Co-constructed interaction in a paired speaking test. The rater's perspective. Language Testing, 26 (3), 397-422.
26. O'Sullivan, B. (2000). Exploring gender and oral proficiency interview performance. System, 28, 373-386.
27. Sawaki, Y.; Stricker, L. J.; Oranje, A. H. (2009). Factor structure of the TOEFL Internet-based test. Language Testing, 26 (1), 5-30.
28. Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Closing a conceptual gap: The case for a description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11 (2), 133-58.
29. Taylor, L. (2006). The changing landscape of English: Implications for language assessment. ELT Journal, 60 (1), 51-60.
30. Taylor, L. & Wigglesworth, G. (2009). Are two heads better than one? Pairwork in L2 assessment contexts. Language Testing, 26 (3), 325-340.
31. Weir, C. J.; Milanovic, M. (Eds) (2003). Continuity and innovation: The history of the CPE 1913-2002. Studies in Language Testing 15, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/UCLES.
32. Zafar Khan, S. (2009). Imperialism of international tests: An EIL perspective. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues (pp. 190-205). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
33. Zhang, Y.; Elder, C. (2009). Native and non-native teachers' evaluation of oral English proficiency in the CET-SET of China. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Association of Applied Linguistics, Denver, CO.
34. Zhang, Y.; Elder, C. (2009, in press). Measuring the speaking proficiency of advanced EFL learners in China: the CET-SET solution. Language Assessment Quarterly.
35. Zheng, Y. & Cheng, L. (2008) Test review: College English Test (CET) in China. Language Testing, 25 (3), 408-417.