Editorial: The future of writing and reviewing for IJMR

International Journal of Management Reviews

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 249-264

  Jones, Oswald ^a   Gatrell, Caroline ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL MANAGEMENT SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY MANAGEMENT SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903523250     PISSN: 14608545     EISSN: 14682370     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12038     Document Type: Editorial

References (100)

1. Adler, R. and Liyanarachchi, G. (2011). An empirical examination of the editorial review processes of accounting journals. Accounting and Finance, 51, pp. 837-867.
2. Akinci, C. and Sadler-Smith, E. (2012). Intuition in management research: a historical review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, pp. 104-122.
3. Al-Amoudi, I. and Willmott, H. (2011). Epistemological relativism where constructionism and critical realism converge: interrogating the domain of epistemological relativism. Organization Studies, 32, pp. 27-46.
4. Alvesson, M. (2010). Self-doubters, strugglers, storytellers, surfers and others: images of self-identities in organization studies. Human Relations, 63, pp. 193-217.
5. Barrios, M., Guilera, G. and Gomez-Benito, J. (2013). Impact and structural factors of meta-analytical studies, standard articles and reviews in psychology: similarities and differences. Journal of Informetrics, 7, pp. 478-486.
6. Bhaskar, R. (1979). The Possibility of Naturalism: a Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Brighton: Harvester Press.
7. Baumeister, R. and Leary, M. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1, pp. 311-320.
8. Bell, E. and Davidson, J. (2013). Visual management studies: empirical and theoretical approaches. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, pp. 167-184.
9. Benson, M., Sporakowski, M. and Stremmelsource, A. (1992). Writing reviews of family literature: guiding students using bloom's taxonomy of cognitive objectives. Family Relations, 41, pp. 65-69.
10. Beynon, H. (1973). Working for Ford. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
11. Billsberry, J. (2014). Desk rejects: 10 top tips to avoid the cull. Journal of Management Education, 38, pp. 3-9.
12. Boaz, A., Baeza, J. and Fraser, A. (2011). Effective implementation of research into practice: an overview of systematic reviews of the health literature. BMC Research Notes, 4, p. 212.
13. Booth, A., Papaioannou, D. and Sutton, A. (2012). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. London: Sage.
14. Braverman, H. (1974). Labour and Monopoly Capitalism. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
15. Breslin, D. (2008). A review of the evolutionary approach to the study of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, pp. 399-424.
16. Briner, R.B., Denyer, D. and Rousseau, D.M. (2009). Evidence-based management: concept cleanup time? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, pp. 19-32.
17. Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, post modernism and organizational analysis 2: the contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9, pp. 221-235.
18. Burrell, G. and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London: Heinemann.
19. Caligiuri, P. and Thomas, D.C. (2013). From the editors: how to write a high-quality review. Journal of International Business Studies, 44, pp. 547-553.
20. Campbell, R. etal. (2003). Evaluating meta-enthography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science and Medicine, 56, pp. 671-684.
21. Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6, pp. 1-22.
22. Clark, T., Floyd, S.W. and Wright, M. (2013). In search of the impactful and the interesting: swings of the pendulum? Journal of Management Studies, 50, pp. 1358-1373.
23. Combs, J.P., Bustamante, R.M. and Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2010). An interactive model for facilitating development of literature reviews. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4, pp. 159-182.
24. Corbett, A., Cornelissen, J., Delios, A. and Harley, B. (2013). Strategizing and operating through our values: JMS at 50. Journal of Management Studies, 50, pp. 1349-1357.
25. Delbridge, R. and Fiss, P.C. (2013). Editors' comments: styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 38, pp. 325-331.
26. Denyer, D. and Tranfield, D. (2006). Using qualitative research to build an actionable knowledge base. Management Decision, 44, pp. 213-227.
27. Denyer, D. and Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In Buchanan, D. and Bryman, A. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. London: Sage, pp. 671-689.
28. Denyer, D., Tranfield, D. and Ernst Van Aken, J. (2008). Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organization Studies, 29, pp. 393-414.
29. Dieleman, M., Gerretsen, B. and van der Wilt, G. (2009). Human resource management interventions to improve health workers' performance in low and middle-income countries: a realist review. Health Service Research Policy & Systems, 7, pp. 1-13.
30. Dixon-Wood, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B. and Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10, pp. 45-53.
31. Drotar, D. (2011). Editorial: enhancing the quality of dialogue among editors, authors, and reviewers in editorial review. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36, pp. 847-851.
32. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Jackson, P. (2008). Management Research, 3rd edn. London: Sage.
33. Fleetwood, S. and Ackroyd, S. (2004). Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies. London: Routledge.
34. Friesl, M. and Larty, J. (2013). Replication of routines in organizations: existing literature and new perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, pp. 106-122.
35. Fulmer, I.S. (2012). Editor's comments: the craft of writing theory articles - variety and similarity in AMR. Academy of Management Review, 37, pp. 27-31.
36. Gatrell, C. (2011). Managing the maternal body. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, pp. 97-112.
37. Gatrell, C. (2013). Maternal body work: how women managers and professionals negotiate pregnancy and new motherhood at work. Human Relations, 66, pp. 621-644.
38. Golicic, S.L. and Smith, C.D. (2013). A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49, pp. 78-95.
39. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., Kyriakidou, O. and Peacock, K. (2005). Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic reviews. Social Science & Medicine, 61, pp. 417-430.
40. Hammersley, M. (2001). On 'systematic' reviews of research literatures: a 'narrative' response to Evans & Benefield. British Educational Research Journal, 27, pp. 543-554.
41. Hart, C. (1998). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Imagination. London: Sage.
42. Hassard, J. and Cox, J.W. (2013). Can sociological paradigms still inform organizational analysis? a paradigm model for post-paradigm times. Organization Studies, 34, pp. 1701-1728.
43. Jesson, J., Matheson, L. and Lacey, F.M. (2011). Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. London: Sage.
44. Jiang, K., Takeuchi, R. and Lepak, D.P. (2013). Where do we go from here? New perspectives on the black box in strategic human resource management research. Journal of Management Studies, 50, pp. 1448-1480.
45. Jones, O. (1995). No guru, no method, no teacher: a critical view of (my) managerial research. Management Learning, 26, pp. 109-127.
46. Jones, O. (1996). Human resources, scientists and internal reputation: the role of climate and job satisfaction. Human Relations, 49, pp. 269-294.
47. Jones, O., Macpherson, A. and Jayawarna, D. (2014). Resourcing New Businesses: Creating Dynamic Entrepreneurial Learning Capabilities. London: Routledge.
48. Kelloway, E.K. and Barling, J. (1999). When children work: implications for youth, society and organizations. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1, pp. 159-170.
49. Keupp, M.M., Palmié, M. and Gassmann, O. (2012). The strategic management of innovation: a systematic review and paths for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, pp. 367-390.
50. Kilduff, M. (2007). Editor's comments: the top ten reasons why your paper might not be sent out to review. Academy of Management Review, 32, pp. 700-702.
51. King, A.W. and Lepak, D. (2011). Editors' comments: myth busting - what we hear and what we've learned about AMR. Academy of Management Review, 36, pp. 207-214.
52. Klag, M. and Langley, A. (2013). Approaching the conceptual leap in qualitative research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, pp. 149-166.
53. Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C. and Groen, A.J. (2010). The resource-based view: a review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management, 36, pp. 349-372.
54. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. Lee, R. (2009). Social capital and business and management: setting a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, pp. 247-273.
57. Lepak, D. (2009). Editor's comments: what is good reviewing. Academy of Management Review, 34, pp. 375-381.
58. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The Savage Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Linton, J. (2012). Editorial: how to get your papers rejected (or not). Technovation, 32, pp. 6-8.
60. Macpherson, A. and Jones, O. (2010). Editorial: strategies for development of International Journal of Management Reviews. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, pp. 107-113.
61. Matthews, R.L. and Marzec, P.E. (2012). Social capital, a theory for operations management: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Production Research, 50, pp. 7081-7099.
62. Mays, N., Pope, C. and Popay, J. (2005). Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(Suppl 1), pp. 6-20.
63. McDonald, P. (2012). Workplace sexual harassment 30 years on: a review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, pp. 1-17.
64. McGovern, P. (2014). Contradictions at work: a critical review. Sociology, 48, pp. 20-37.
65. Munro, I. (2012). The management of circulations: biopolitical variations after Foucault. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, pp. 345-367.
66. Noblit, G. and Hare, R. (1988). Meta-Enthnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
67. O'Boyle, E.H., Jr, Pollack, J.M. and Rutherford, M.W. (2012). Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms' financial performance: a meta-analysis of main and moderator effects. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, pp. 1-18.
68. Özbilgin, M.T. (2010). Scholarship of consequence: new directions for the British Journal of Management. British Journal of Management, 21, pp. 1-6.
69. Özbilgin, M.T. (2011). Continuity and change: improving our service to the BJM community and moving towards contextual studies of management. British Journal of Management, 22, pp. 1-3.
70. Özbilgin, M.T., Beauregard, T.A., Tatli, A. and Bell, M.P. (2011). Work-life, diversity and intersectionality: a critical review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, pp. 177-198.
71. Paltridge, B. (2013). Referees' comments on submissions to peer-reviewed journals: when is a suggestion not a suggestion? Studies in Higher Education, doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.818641.
72. Pawson, R. (2002). Evidence-based policy: the promise of 'realist synthesis'. Evaluation, 8, pp. 340-358.
73. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, N.P. and Bachrach, D.G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: a bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34, pp. 641-720.
74. Reed, M. (2005). Reflections on the 'realist turn' in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 42, pp. 1621-1644.
75. Ridley, D. (2012). The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students. London: Sage.
76. Rousseau, D. (ed.) (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Rousseau, D., Manning, J. and Denyer, D. (2008). Chapter 11: evidence in management and organizational science: assembling the field's full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Academy of Management Annals, 2, pp. 475-515.
78. Rycroft-Malone, J. etal. (2012). Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research. Implementation Science, 7, pp. 1-10.
79. Sarasvathy, S. (2001). Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26, pp. 243-263.
80. Scherer, A.G. and Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: a review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48, pp. 899-931.
81. Shepherd, C. and Challenger, R. (2013). Revisiting paradigm(s) in management research: a rhetorical analysis of the paradigm wars. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, pp. 225-244.
82. Simon, H. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83. Sutton, R. and Staw, I. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, pp. 371-384.
84. Tatli, A. and Özbilgin, M. (2012). An emic approach to intersectional study of diversity at work: a Bourdieuan framing. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, pp. 180-200.
85. Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M., Noblit, G. and Sandelowski, M. (2004). Qualitative metasynthesis: reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitative Health Research, 14, pp. 1342-1365.
86. Thorpe, R., Holt, R., Macpherson, A. and Pittaway, L. (2005). Using knowledge within small and medium-sized enterprises: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, pp. 257-281.
87. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, pp. 207-222.
88. Treviño, L.K. (2008). Editor's responsibility: why reviewing is a professional responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, pp. 8-10.
89. Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13, pp. 567-582.
90. Turner, N., Swart, J. and Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, pp. 317-332.
91. Van Aken, J.E. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field-tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41, pp. 219-246.
92. Vogel, R. and Güttel, W.H. (2013). The dynamic capability view in strategic management: a bibliometric review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, pp. 426-446.
93. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Sociological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
94. Webster, J. and Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26, pp. 13-23.
95. Weick, K. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14, pp. 516-531.
96. Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29, pp. 731-735.
97. Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J. and Pawson, R. (2013a). RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. BMC Medicine, 11:20, pp. 1-15.
98. Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J. and Pawson, R. (2013b). RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. BMC Medicine, 11:21, pp. 1-14.
99. Wood, G., Wilkinson, A. and Harcourt, M. (2008). Age discrimination and working life: perspectives and contestations - a review of the contemporary literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, pp. 425-442.
100. Zott, C., Amit, R. and Massa, L. (2011). The business model: recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37, pp. 1019-1042.