Impact and structural features of meta-analytical studies, Standard articles and reviews in psychology: Similarities and differences

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 478-486

  Barrios, Maite ^a   Guilera, Georgina ^a   Gómez Benito, Juana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Citations; Document type; Impact; Meta analysis; Review

Indexed keywords

CITATIONS; DOCUMENT TYPE; IMPACT; INSTITUTIONAL COLLABORATION; META-ANALYSIS; RESEARCH SYNTHESIS; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

REVIEWS;

EID: 84874716030     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Amin M., Mabe M. Impact factors: Use and abuse. Perspectives in Publishing 2000, 1:1-6.
2. Aksnes D.W. Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation 2003, 12(3):159-170.
3. Beaver D.B. Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority?. Scientometrics 2004, 60(3):399-408.
4. Borenstein M., Hedges L.V., Higgins J.P.T., Rothstein H.R. Introduction to meta-analysis 2009, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., United Kingdom.
5. Bornmann L., Daniel H.D. Multiple publications on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2007, 58(8):1100-1107.
6. Bornmann L., Mutz R., Neuhaus C., Daniel H.D. Citation counts for research evaluation: Standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 2008, 8:93-102.
7. Borrego A., Barrios M., Villarroya A., Ollé C. Scientific output and impact of postdoctoral scientists: A gender perspective. Scientometrics 2010, 83(1):93-101.
8. Braun T., Glänzel W., Schubert A. Some data on the distribution of journal publication types in the Science Citation Index database. Scientometrics 1989, 15(5-6):325-330.
9. Cooper H. Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step by step approach 2010, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousands Oaks, CA. 4th ed.
10. The handbook of research synthesis 1994, Russell Sage Foundation, New York. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges (Eds.).
11. Dong P., Loh M., Mondry A. The "impact factor" revisited. Biomedical Digital Libraries 2005, 2:7.
12. Glänzel W., Moed H.F. Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics 2002, 53(2):171-193.
13. Glänzel W., Rinia E.J., Brocken M.G.M. A bibliometric study of highly cited European physics papers in the 80s. Research Evaluation 1995, 5(2):113-122.
14. Gonzalez-Albo B., Bordons M. Articles vs. proceedings papers: Do they differ in research relevance and impact? A case study in the Library and Information Science field. Journal of Informetrics 2011, 5:368-381.
15. Guilera G., Barrios M., Gómez-Benito J. Meta-analysis in psychology: A bibliometric study. Scientometrics 2013, 94:943-954.
16. Harzing A.W. Document categories in the ISI web of knowledge: Misunderstanding the social sciences?. Scientometrics 2013, 14(1):23-34.
17. Haslam N., Ban L., Kaufmann L., Loughnan S., Peters K., Whelan J., et al. What makes an article influential? Predicting impact in social and personality psychology. Scientometrics 2008, 76(1):169-185.
18. Lawani S.M. Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics 1986, 9(1-2):13-25.
19. Littell J.H., Corcoran J., Pillai V. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
20. McVeigh M.E., Mann S.J. The journal impact factor denominator. Defining citable (counted) items. Journal of American Medical Association 2009, 302(10):1107-1109.
21. Moed H.F. Citation analysis in research evaluation 2005, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
22. Peters H.P.F., van Raan A.F.J. On determinants of citations scores-A case-study in chemical engineering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1994, 45(1):39-49.
23. Seglen P.O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal 1997, 314:498-502.
24. Sigogneau A. An analysis of document types published in journals related to physics: Proceeding papers recorded in the Science Citation Index database. Scientometrics 2000, 47(3):589-604.
25. Smith M.L., Glass G.V. Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist 1977, 32:752-760.
26. Thomson Reuters. (1994). The Thomson Reuters Impact Factor. Retrieved from. http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/free/essays/impact_factor/.
27. van Raan A.F.J. For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement 2005, 3(1):50-62.
28. Vieira E.S., Gomes J.A.N.F. Citations to scientific articles: Its distribution and dependence on the article features. Journal of Informetrics 2010, 4:1-13.
29. Vieira E.S., Gomes J.A.N.F. The journal relative impact: An indicator for journal assessment. Scientometrics 2011, 89(2):631-651.