Geometric facial gender scoring: Objectivity of perception

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Gilani, Syed Zulqarnain ^a   Rooney, Kathleen ^a   Shafait, Faisal ^a   Walters, Mark ^b   Mian, Ajmal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FACIES; FEMALE; FEMININITY; GENDER SCORING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MASCULINITY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; ALGORITHM; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; FACE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ALGORITHMS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PERCEPTION; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84903398973     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099483     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM (2011) The many faces of research on face perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366: 1634-1637.
2. Leopold DA, Rhodes G (2010) A comparative view of face perception. Journal of Comparative Psychology 124: 233.
3. Rhodes G, Hickford C, Jeffery L (2000) Sex-typicality and attractiveness: Are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive? British Journal of Psychology 91: 125-140.
4. Little AC, Hancock PJ (2002) The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. British Journal of Psychology 93: 451-464.
5. Rhodes G, Simmons LW, Peters M (2005) Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 186-201. (Pubitemid 40317010)
6. Boothroyd LG, Jones BC, Burt DM, DeBruine LM, Perrett DI (2008) Facial correlates of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior 29: 211-218.
7. Jones BC, Feinberg DR, Watkins CD, Fincher CL, Little AC, et al. (2013) Pathogen disgust predicts womens preferences for masculinity in mens voices, faces, and bodies. Behavioral Ecology 24: 373-379.
8. Lee AJ, Dubbs SL, Kelly AJ, von Hippel W, Brooks RC, et al. (2013) Human facial attributes, but not perceived intelligence, are used as cues of health and resource provision potential. Behavioral Ecology 24: 779-787.
9. Perrett D, Lee K, Penton-Voak I, Rowland D, Yoshikawa S, et al. (1998) Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394: 884-887. (Pubitemid 28410908)
10. Rhodes G, Chan J, Zebrowitz LA, Simmons LW (2003) Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 270: S93-S95. (Pubitemid 36960324)
11. Bejerot S, Eriksson JM, Bonde S, Carlström K, Humble MB, et al. (2012) The extreme male brain revisited: gender coherence in adults with autism spectrum disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry 201: 116-123.
12. Peters M, Rhodes G, Simmons L (2008) Does attractiveness in men provide clues to semen quality? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21: 572-579. (Pubitemid 351208125)
13. Koehler N, Simmons LW, Rhodes G, Peters M (2004) The relationship between sexual dimorphism in human faces and fluctuating asymmetry. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 271: S233-S236. (Pubitemid 38586402)
14. Dey JK, Ishii M, Boahene K, Byrne PJ, Ishii LE (2013) Changing perception: Facial reanimation surgery improves attractiveness and decreases negative facial perception. The Laryngoscope.
15. Chung EH, Borzabad-Farahani A, Yen SLK (2013) Clinicians and laypeople assessment of facial attractiveness in patients with cleft lip and palate treated with lefort i surgery or late maxillary protraction. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology.
16. Scheib JE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R (1999) Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of LondonB: Biological Sciences 266: 1913-1917. (Pubitemid 29457076)
17. Penton-Voak I, Jones B, Little A, Baker S, Tiddeman B, et al. (2001) Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 268: 1617-1623. (Pubitemid 32730418)
18. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (2006) Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior 27: 131-144. (Pubitemid 43246352)
19. Pound N, Penton-Voak IS, Surridge AK (2009) Testosterone responses to competition in men are related to facial masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276: 153-159.
20. Burton AM, Bruce V, Dench N (1993) What's the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement. Perception 22: 153-176.
21. Scott IM, Pound N, Stephen ID, Clark AP, Penton-Voak IS (2010) Does masculinity matter? the contribution of masculine face shape to male attractiveness in humans. PLoS one 5: e13585.
22. Stephen ID, Scott IM, Coetzee V, Pound N, Perrett DI, et al. (2012) Cross-cultural effects of color, but not morphological masculinity, on perceived attractiveness of men's faces. Evolution and Human Behavior 33: 260-267.
23. Bruce V, Burton AM, Hanna E, Healey P (1993) Sex discrimination: how do we tell the difference between male and female faces? Perception 22: 131-152.
24. Graf A, Wichmann FA, Bülthoff HH, Schölkopf BH (2006) Classification of faces in man and machine. Neural Computation 18: 143-165. (Pubitemid 43543854)
25. O'Toole AJ, Vetter T, Troje NF, Bülthoff HH (1997) Sex classification is better with three-dimensional head structure than with image intensity information. Perception 26: 75-84. (Pubitemid 127447694)
26. Bruce V, Young A (1986) Understanding face recognition. British journal of psychology 77: 305-327.
27. Weinberg SM, Naidoo S, Govier DP, Martin RA, Kane AA, et al. (2006) Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: comparing the genex and 3dmd imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 17: 477-483. (Pubitemid 44314843)
28. Farkas L (1994) Anthropometry of the head and face in clinical practice. Anthropometry of the Head and Face, 2nd Ed: 71-111.
29. Farkas LG, Kolar JC (1987) Anthropometrics and art in the aesthetics of women's faces. Clinics in Plastic Surgery 14: 599.
30. Aldridge K, George I, Cole K, Austin J, Takahashi T, et al. (2011) Facial phenotypes in subgroups of prepubertal boys with autism spectrum disorders are correlated with clinical phenotypes. Molecular Autism 2: 15.
31. Bardin CW, Catterall JF (1981) Testosterone: A major determinant of extragenital sexual dimorphism. Science 211: 1285-1294. (Pubitemid 11097282)
32. DErico J (2008) Surface fitting using gridfit. Technical report, MATLAB Central File Exchange.
33. Abdi H, Valentin D, Edelman B, O'Toole AJ (1995) More about the difference between men and women: evidence from linear neural network and the principal-component approach. Perception 24: 539-539.
34. Martin Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 327: 307-310.
35. Peng H, Long F, Ding C (2005) Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) 27: 1226-1238. (Pubitemid 41245053)
36. Kohavi R, John GH (1997) Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial Intelligence 97: 273-324. (Pubitemid 127401107)
37. Duda R, Hart P, Stork D (2001) Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis 2nd ed.
38. Fleiss JL (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin 76: 378.
39. Hamza A, Krim H (2006) Geodesic matching of triangulated surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15: 2249-2258. (Pubitemid 44089099)
40. Gupta S, Markey M, Bovik A (2010) Anthropometric 3D face recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision 90: 331-349.
41. Bronstein A, Bronstein M, Kimmel R (2005) Three-dimensional face recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision 64: 5-30. (Pubitemid 40920856)
42. Armann R, Bülthoff I (2012) Male and female faces are only perceived categorically when linked to familiar identities-and when in doubt, he is a male. Vision research 63: 69-80.
43. Gao J, Zhou M, Wang H, Zhang C (2001) Three dimensional surface warping for plastic surgery planning. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. IEEE, volume 3, pp. 2016-2021.
44. Bracaglia R, Fortunato R, Gentileschi S (2005) Secondary rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 29: 230-239. (Pubitemid 41205598)
45. Singular Inversions Facegen Modeller. Available: http://www.facegen.com/. Accessed 26 May 2014.
46. Blanz V, Vetter T (2003) Face recognition based on fitting a 3D morphable model. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 25: 1063-1074.
47. Hoss RA, Ramsey JL, Griffin AM, Langlois JH (2005) The role of facial attractiveness and facial masculinity/femininity in sex classification of faces. Perception 34: 1459.
48. DeBruine LM, Jones BC, Little AC, Boothroyd LG, Perrett DI, et al. (2006) Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273: 1355-1360. (Pubitemid 47308755)
49. Rieger G, Linsenmeier JA, Gygax L, Garcia S, Bailey JM (2010) Dissecting "gaydar": Accuracy and the role of masculinity-femininity. Archives of Sexual Behavior 39: 124-140.